Latest Articles

  • A Clarification

    A snippet of a comment from this site:

    But increasingly people like me who are educated are turning away from content creators who are pushing rabid Anti-MAGA. propaganda. I’m really sorry to see the direction this website has taken.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    1. While I may advocate that there is no voting our way out of this, I have not told anyone else not to vote. I have advocated to not vote for the lesser of two evils. I want to make a point that everyone should agree upon: You have a right to vote as I have a right not to vote. Making specious arguments concerning how I live my life and making decisions concerning voting is not anyone else’s purview. I will be voting for the three amendments in North Carolina in November.
    2. I want to make a point considering MAGA. Whoever is against making their country great again is a traitor. It has nothing to do with Trump except for initiating the acronym. Like the word “conservative”, we should agree on what MAGA is and how to achieve its initial goals or security the border and restoring our economy. I can be MAGA and not agree with Trump.
    3. Concerning Trump:

    People need to discern the truth concerning Trump. If we cannot have an open discourse on the state of the country, you are not my countrymen. I provide a site to give people information in which they can decide how to develop intelligence for surviving the future. If you do not like the tone, you may leave but I would rather discuss it. Are we past the point of agreeing that we can disagree?

    4. So put MAGA aside and let’s discuss the following issues:

    a. Did Trump have the authority to overthrow Venezuela?

    b. Did Trump have the authority to attack Iran and kill their nation’s leader during negotiations?

    c. Are you satisfied with the actions of the House, Senate and President concerning fiscal policy and Israeli control?

    d. Would you consider taking a mRNA gene therapy shot?

    e. Are you concerned with our border situation, immigration, H1B visas or inflation?

    Over the past year, I have changed my viewpoint on Israel, the genocide in Gaza, Trump’s mental abilities, the nation’s fiscal policy and what I feel is an impending nuclear war.

    Have we sunk so low, that we divide ourselves based on failed ideology instead of our founding principles?

    I saw a comment from Hammer’s Thor concerning Trump’s accomplishments. It is quite a list but I will not go down that path. I do not think it is out of line to ask questions concerning our country.

    It is evil to support the genocide in Gaza, the murder of school children and the coverup of the Epstein files. Readers are encouraged to use critical thinking to discuss issues. If you do not want to address the evil in this nation, why do you come here?

  • What I will do the first 24 hours after a complete collapse of society and some great comments.

  • I Thought Everyone Knew This

  • North Carolina Education

  • Republicans in the Senate Are Israel First

  • Trump: India First

  • Dollar Store Obama

  • Time to Take America Back

  • We Don’t Need No Constitution

    Update:

    This is the verification that I received from Grok before I posted this information:

    DeepLeaksHQ post shares a video from a New Mexico press conference where Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham states that no constitutional rights are absolute, justifying emergency measures on gun carry restrictions amid gun violence concerns in areas like Albuquerque.

    The governor’s comments reference using public health emergency powers to temporarily limit open and concealed carry, arguing such actions address immediate public safety threats despite Second Amendment challenges.

    This revives debate on executive emergency authority versus individual rights, as past similar orders faced lawsuits, injunctions, and criticism that they risk broadly undermining constitutional protections.

    Grok did not tell me that this information was two years old and had been overturned. So much for Superior Intelligence on verification.

  • What Could Go Wrong?

    From Grok playing the devil’s advocate:

    The accord is a short, voluntary, “morally binding” statement with no new statutes, no penalties, no independent government inspectorate, and no requirement that any finding be made public. That structure creates several predictable failure modes.

    Companies have strong financial incentives to under-report problems. Internal monitoring and the internal “check the checkers” team both live inside the same organization racing to ship the next model. An external auditor paid by the company and an “independent” board committee selected by the existing board can become rubber stamps, especially when the same executives sit on multiple labs’ boards or share investors. Similar self-policing arrangements in finance, social media content moderation, and aviation safety have repeatedly produced delayed disclosure, revolving-door auditors, and findings that only surface after harm occurs.

    The four layers also assume the companies can actually detect the risks they list—cyber, bio, chemical, unintended system access. Current frontier models already exhibit unexpected capabilities and alignment failures that their own developers did not anticipate. If the next jump in capability is large and fast, the monitoring systems built on today’s models may simply be obsolete. Competitive pressure and the U.S.–China framing make it costly for any single firm to pause or disclose a serious issue if rivals keep scaling.

    Coverage is incomplete. The signatories are a handful of large labs. Open-source developers, smaller startups, foreign labs, and anyone who fine-tunes or deploys the models later sit outside the accord. Even among signatories, “frontier” is undefined, so a company can argue a new system is not covered. Regular meetings among the firms to set shared standards can look like coordination on safety or like a cartel that raises barriers for newcomers while leaving the hardest problems unsolved.

    Finally, the document itself notes that these steps “may” later become law. That language can function as a delay tactic: the appearance of action substitutes for binding rules while capabilities continue to grow. If a serious incident occurs, the public will learn after the fact that the four layers were advisory, the auditors were selected by the audited, and no one had the authority to compel a shutdown. Those are the classic weaknesses of industry self-regulation when the downside is large and the upside of racing is enormous.

  • What Would George Washington Say?

  • You Cannot Polish a Turd

  • Verified

  • Disband the BATFE

  • Exactly Right

    People are waking up to the reality of an evil government. They are not angry enough to fight but the reality is sinking in.

Menu

CADD Graphics

Laser Engraving by CADD Graphics

Carolina Readiness Supply

Social Media and Websites

NC Renegade on Twitter
NC Renegade on Gab
NC Renegade on Truth Social
Wes Rhinier on Gab


12 Round Blog
Barnhardt
Cold Fury
The Feral Irishman
Hammer’s Thor
Knuckledraggin My Life Away
Liberty’s Torch
90 Miles From Tyranny
Publius-Huldah’s Blog
Smoky Mountain Myco
Straight Line Logic
The Tactical Hermit
Western Rifle Shooters Association

Recent Comments

  1. Steady Steve on SpaceX

    Elon is going to fill that role in the live remake.

  2. The ones that don’t turn themselves in to be arrested have an appointment with a long, sharp, wood pole. Courtesy…

  3. Unfortunately I live in one of the mostly blue counties in south Florida. But at least down here we’ve done…

  4. Shut it down in Ukraine 100%. Let’s get the war over now.

  5. Wish she would start doxing these individuals so we could start taking care of business. These are domestic enemies engaged…