Alexander Dugin: Philosopher. Doctor of Sociology and of Political sciences, PhD of Philosophy. Founder of Russian geopolitical school and Eurasian Movement.

The Third World War is being waged between those who want to preserve and strengthen the hegemony of the collective West at any cost (both in its wild-Trumpist, Zionist version and in the globalist Euro-model), and multipolar humanity — that is, us. It is already underway. In full swing.

Right now the enemy (the Epstein Empire) is preparing, but is not yet ready to wage three wars simultaneously. And if someone else from the multipolar world opens an additional front, the enemy’s forces will be spread across the entire planet. It is high time to begin a global planetary uprising against the dictatorship of Baal. He has exposed himself sufficiently.

Everyone has seen the true face of the West — it is Epstein. It is the murdered Iranian schoolgirls, it is the tens of thousands of infants in Gaza. No one can say: “I didn’t know, I didn’t see, I wasn’t aware.” That excuse no longer works. Everyone has seen and everyone knows, and if they are still not fighting on our side of the front, then in essence they are on the side of the enemy. And they become legitimate targets.

The Sunni Islamic world is divided, its upper echelons are corrupt and integrated into the Epstein archipelago, the masses are corrupted by idiotic Salafism and Wahhabism, which make Muslims pour out their anger on the innocent and defend the interests of the US and Israel. 

Continue reading …

Note: We have become accustomed to team play. In sports it may be Redskins versus Cowboys. In politics it’s Left versus Right or Republican versus Democrat. In religion it’s Christian versus Muslim versus Pagan. As always in human nature, it’s us against them. As I’ve passed seventy two spring times, I’ve come to understand that things are never so black and white. I’ve come to see good versus evil and justice versus injustice very plainly. For that reason I no longer have a ‘team.’ I judge things based on good/evil and just/unjust. So, even if those of whom I disapprove are being ill treated, I don’t fail to call it out. For that reason I find little that the professor has written here with which to disagree.

The Next Event

Potential for a false flag.

Yeah, It’s Going Great

The inevitable blame game.

3GW vs 5GW

Not World War II.

Dimona and Ben Gurion

Use of Khorramshahr-4 deep penetration missile.

For the Christian reader …

There’s not the slightest hint of a Zionist theme in the New Testament. Everywhere you look in the Bible, you see Zionism held to exclusively by unbelievers, and rejected by spirit-filled Christians.

Netanyahu told the world last week, in his own words, what the Zionist Messiah looks like. Ruthless enough. Powerful enough. Strong enough. He described a conqueror, a Khan, a man who takes what he wants by force and calls it the will of God. The Jews have been waiting for that figure for two thousand years, and Christianity exists precisely because the real Messiah showed up and refused the job description. He took the cross instead of the throne, and he told his followers to pick up theirs. The irony is that he will very much resemble the warlord they wanted the first time, but the enemy He’ll be conquering is those who rejected Him.

The Christian who understands that cannot be a Zionist. At least, not a coherent or honest one. The religion itself won’t allow it. The Holy Spirit, when he shows up, kills the question. He did it at Pentecost, and he will do it again every time a believer actually reads the Book they claim to believe.

Christianity is an anti-Zionist religion. It was from the beginning. The evidence is in the text, in the history, in the flight to Pella, and in the Apostle Paul’s cheerful description of his entire ethnic inheritance as a pile of rubbish. And the evidence is in the words of Benjamin Netanyahu himself, who accidentally explained the precise theological error that got Jesus crucified while trying to justify a war with Iran. Jesus wasn’t then, and never will be, the Zionist they wanted. Instead, He’s the Savior they rejected. And when He returns, he’s not establishing a mere Kingdom in the land that was once ancient Israel. He’s establishing a kingdom over the entire world, not as the Jewish Messiah alone, but as the global One.

Continue reading for the proof …

If the above premise is correct, we are facing only two outcomes. The title states two choices but outcomes are not always based on choices made by oppressed people. No one would willingly choose a life where you have to obey a totalitarian leadership. Would we choose a revolution?

Our forefathers made the decision to rebel. And Jefferson admonished us on how to maintain Liberty:

Here are some facts concerning our government:

1. They lied concerning COVID-19, the development of SARS-COV2 and the gene therapy conveniently released as a vaccine.
2. They lied concerning the Epstein files.
3. They have consistently stolen elections through voter fraud and manipulation of voting machines.
4. They have bankrupted our country.
5. They are controlled by Israel.

And now they are lying about World War III. Everyday.

I have two questions:

1. Is there another option other than slavery or revolution?
2. What is the outcome of a revolution?

My hope is that Americans will never accept slavery. I could make a cogent argument that we already have. Our children and grandchildren are enslaved by debt. Our wages are excessively taxed to line the pockets of politicians and governments around the world. Are we not already wage slaves? The reason that the government opened our borders was to dilute our freedom, wealth and rights to make us compliant as a more “diverse” population.

What is a valid course forward? There may be other options but at this point, let’s assume that it is a binary choice as outlined in the video. This means that revolution is the only choice available to us. What would Jesus do? Would he render unto a Caesar that represents evil? Would he have us submit to a government based on the coverup of the Epstein files, child sex trafficking and abortion?

We know the answer. We also know that we are running out of time to make the choice. Or is the luxury of time running out on us and the choice will be forced upon us? The third option may be as simple as losing World War III. What becomes of a bankrupt and defeated “superpower” that the world has abandoned? What happens to a nation who has abandoned God may be the more appropriate question?

Black Women Bear Brunt Of Mass Layoffs With The Rise Of AI And The End Of DEI

Over the course of the last decade, the great social debate has mostly revolved around the issue of “merit vs equity”, or equality of opportunity vs equality of outcome.  For anyone with common sense it’s clear that “equity” is a non-starter; a system which skews accomplishment and hands success to unqualified people based solely on their ethnicity, gender or sexual identity.  The experiment has been disastrous for western civilization so far.

Women in general and black women in particular were initially sought out by companies to fill DEI quotas that should not have existed in the first place.  These quotas were instituted because governments and NGO’s created the demand for them by offering numerous subsidies, tax breaks and special credit access.  Corporations that met the DEI requirements would then have a financial edge on the competition, so everyone had to participate to avoid being surpassed by the other guy. 

One interesting side effect has been the encouragement of cultural delusion among certain demographics.  The idea that minorities are somehow being “held back” by “white supremacy” and that they are at the same time far more accomplished than their oppressors is self perpetuating.  One of the most common arguments heard in defense of the woke era was that “black women are the most educated and successful group” in America today. 

As easily as black women were elevated to six-figure incomes and the upper-middle class lifestyle, they are now on the verge of losing it all.  The sad thing is, DEI built an environment in which every minority in a high level position became suspect.  While there are certainly minority employees who are highly skilled and deserve the jobs they have, the decade of DEI has put them in a state of constant suspicion.  Today, no one knows who was hired based on merit, and who was hired because of their skin color.     

Continue reading …

Size comparison: Vietnam overlaying Iran

Love them or hate them, the Russian position on the Iranian conflict seems accurate.

On Friday Dmitry Medvedev weighed in, and as expected the former Russian president and current Deputy Chairman of the Security Council was much less guarded in his assessment. He warned at a moment thousands of US Marines and Airborne troop are en route to the Middle East that if the US enters a ground war in Iran it will be another “Vietnam”.

American boots on the ground so far from US shores “threatens roughly the same consequences as what happened in Vietnam,” Medvedev said as quotes in NBC and others.

“When Washington intervened in a foreign country, located a thousand miles away, and for ten years was unable to find a dignified way out of this conflict,” he told the state-run RIA news agency.

He added that a potential ground operation in Iran would have “fatal consequences” for the broader region and for all involved in the war.

Continue reading …

I think the proper conclusion is that the people are in a very bad spot.

The bottom line of the war is this: The US has nothing left to hit because Iran has gone “dark” and salted away its premiere systems, bunkered down its leadership, and only launches missiles from underground cities the US and Israel can’t penetrate because they’re deep inside Iran and would require establishing the “air superiority” that supposedly existed since day one.

In reality, it’s likely Trump himself does not know what he plans to do and is merely operating on a daily whim based on how much his “highlight reel” briefings have jacked up his endorphins that particular morning. The ‘strategic ambiguity’ card is a given for the sake of buying time, but it’s clear now that Iran is not being degraded at all and is actually only growing stronger given that socio-political consolidation has ramped up throughout the country owing to the failure of the West’s various psychological schemes.

Personally, I lean towards Ken Klippenstein’s earlier thesis that the supposedly-ongoing concentration of US ground troops is meant more as a psychological threat factor to leverage Iran into negotiations. But that doesn’t mean that should this leverage option fail, Trump won’t legitimately consider deploying the troops in some way, shape, or form—though no one yet can come up with an even semi-plausible scenario for how exactly such an operation could unfold.

Continue reading …