From Vox Popoli

If a ship is hit by a missile in the Gulf of Oman, but the Department of War denies it, does it make a sound?

-Reports are coming in indicating that at least four ships are on fire in the Gulf of Oman, near the Persian Gulf, after Iran fired missiles. The image above, from NASA FIRMS satellite data, shows fire ignition in the Strait of Hormuz off Oman’s Musandam province at 22:21 UTC, in roughly the same area where Iran’s IRGC Navy said three US destroyers were damaged and forced to “flee” toward the Sea of Oman.

– Reports are beginning to surface saying that during yesterday’s battle with Iran, ten (10) U.S. Sailors were wounded and Five (5) others are “Missing.” How could five Sailors be “Missing” unless they got blown off a Destroyer by the Concussion Wave of missile(s) impacting? Yet we’ve been told by US Officials that none of the missiles fired by Iran hit any of our ships.

The gap between what we’re told and what actually happened would appear to be growing.

You speak truth and they hear threat.
You show evidence and they see “extremism.”
You say “I’ve changed” and they reply, with perfect contempt, “Yeah… you’ve changed.”

It’s never admiration. It’s always an accusation.

Living fully in base reality isn’t “being right.”

It’s refusing—every single fucking day—to shrink back into the old skin for the sake of belonging, peace, or love.

It’s speaking the new dialect even when it costs you everything.

It’s becoming the mentor the village never asked for and never wanted.

The old world’s gone.

Your old self’s gone.

Now stop looking back.

Start building.

Read the entire Burlingame post

The following comment came from an article discussing the conflict between Iran and the United States:

“First, Iran is not the leading sponsor of terrorism” …. Prithee, then, who is? Johnson blithely tosses out that statement which then leaves the rest of the article in serious doubt. Poorly written and dubious.

Who is the leading sponsor of terrorism? Is this the right question or another attempt to divide us? Let’s start by Grok’s answer to my question to define terrorism in modern terms:

What the Concept Means in Today’s Practical Terms:

Terrorism is premeditated violence (or credible threat of it) by non-state actors (or clandestine state agents) directed at civilians or symbolic targets to generate fear far beyond the immediate victims, with the goal of forcing political, ideological, or social change. Key modern distinctions:

• Not ordinary crime: Motive must be political/ideological, not personal gain.
• Not legitimate warfare: Excludes acts in recognized armed conflicts governed by the laws of war (those can be war crimes instead).
• Evolving scope: Includes lone actors (“lone wolves”), cyber-enabled attacks, and ideologically driven domestic violence. Recent data (Global Terrorism Index 2026) notes a rise in politically motivated attacks amid global fragmentation. visionofhumanity.org
• Applies across ideologies: Right-wing, left-wing, religious, ethno-nationalist, environmental—any motive qualifies if it meets the criteria.

In short, the contemporary concept boils down to weaponized fear through unlawful violence against the innocent to achieve a political outcome. This framework guides counter-terrorism laws, prosecutions, and intelligence worldwide in 2026.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Based on the clarification above, Iran’s actions may be war crimes but not terrorism. But the trap is set: is terrorism the primary concern for the world at this point? Or should we limit the geography to the United States? Based on the news we see everyday, Americans are more concerned by attacks from black criminals than the actions of Iran. But even this type of terrorism is enabled and encouraged by the two-tiered justice system.

According to Grok, this is not even terrorism:

The alleged soft-on-crime approach is not terrorism under any current legal or operational definition. It lacks the required violent act by the enablers themselves. At most, it’s accused of facilitating ordinary crime for political ends—closer to dereliction, corruption, or strategic malpractice than terrorism. Terrorism is a tool of the powerless or ideological outsiders; this critique paints it as a tool of the powerful operating from within the system. Both seek fear-driven change, but one operates through the rule of law’s loopholes, the other by shattering it.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Let’s regroup and ask this question: what group or nation is most responsible for bringing about global economic change by destroying cultures, genocide and wars? When you consider this question, think about the following list:

1. Development of the SARS-COV2 virus.
2. Development of the gene therapies to treat COVID-19.
3. The color revolutions to overthrow governments around the world including the United States.
4. Manipulation of stock markets, commodities and foreign exchanges.
5. Wars since WWII and false flags.
6. Open borders in the West to destroy cultures and seize power in nations.
7. Voter fraud to select candidates and to implement a specific agenda.
8. Inflation, taxes and regulations to erase the wealth of the middle class.
9. Coverups: Epstein files, JFK and RFK assassinations, USS Liberty and the 2020 Presidential election.
10. Who funded the 911 attacks.

One group’s terrorism is another group’s freedom fight. See Israel’s formation. This approach to clarify our objectives is a start but not an end to a dystopian future. What if we define our true enemy, their agenda and actively start implementing a course of action to regain our fallen Republic and restore Liberty for our children?

Or we can continue to let false information and lies direct our actions.

Are there any major revelations?

From Grok:

No confirmation of alien life, extraterrestrial technology, or government cover-ups of crashes/retrievals. The release emphasizes transparency (“the American people can now access the federal government’s declassified UAP files instantly” and “make up their own minds”) rather than new scientific or intelligence breakthroughs. Officials (including Secretary of War Pete Hegseth) stress that past administrations downplayed the topic, but this effort is about maximum openness on unresolved cases only.

Early public and media reaction (including on Reddit’s r/UFOs megathread) is mixed: some appreciate the raw data dump and historical context, but many note it feels like “more of the same” murky footage and paperwork without smoking-gun proof. The site experienced glitches shortly after launch due to traffic, which may explain access issues.

In short, this is a significant transparency step compiling previously hard-to-access or redacted records in one place, including some never-publicly-released videos and astronaut observations. It adds to the public record but does not fundamentally change the official stance that these remain unexplained due to limited data—no ET revelations here. You can view the files directly at the site (more will be added over time).

Files here.

h/t WRSA

This, boys and girls, is called an impasse. The US position rests on a number of false assumptions. First, Iran is not the leading sponsor of terrorism and has not been engaged in plots to destabilize it Gulf Arab neighbors. Second, there is no rift between the political leaders of Iran and the IRGC… the President, the Foreign Minister, the Head of the Iranian legislature and the Ayatollah all fought and served with the IRGC during the war with Iraq. Third, Iran’s economy is beginning to revive thanks to support from Russia, China and Pakistan and from the high price of oil. Fourth, notwithstanding Trump’s claims to the contrary, the Iranian navy, air force and ballistic missile, cruise missile and drones are intact and able to continue exchanging blows with the US and Israel.

Donald Trump faces several dilemmas… The US economy is beginning to falter with growing public anger over the surging price of gasoline. There are no viable military options to effect a regime change in Iran or to compel Iran to agree to US demands. The US supplies of critical weapons systems will be further depleted if the US renews its aerial and missile attacks on Iran, and Iranian retaliation on US and Israeli targets will inflict significant damage. As long as the US continues to attack Iran, its relations with Russia and China will deteriorate.

Continue reading Sonar21 …