🚨JAPANESE 30-YEAR GOVT BOND YIELD EXPLODES ABOVE 4% TO HIGHEST YIELD EVER‼️

⚡️HAS THE JAPANESE SOVEREIGN DEBT CRISIS BEGUN⁉️
📈30-YEAR JGB YIELDS ARE GOING PARABOLIC, HIT 4.13%⚠️ pic.twitter.com/OoWJHWspvc

— SilverTrade (@silvertrade) August 18, 2026

LEAKED FOOTAGE THAT DESTROYS THE OFFICIAL OCTOBER 7 STORY

For years, Americans were given a highly sanitized account of October 7: Israel’s heavily funded military and intelligence apparatus allegedly failed for hours while Hamas killed and abducted Israelis. Now, new footage… pic.twitter.com/VIAdaiqgMI

— Ben Swann (@BenSwann_) August 18, 2026

Nationalism/Race

Comment: There is nothing wrong with protecting our blood, and that doesn’t make us racist. … and … Do not let perfect be the enemy of good. Realistically, we will never achieve a racially “pure” country. But we can certainly remove the very worst groups that sow discord and destruction. As I see it, there are four principle groups that need biggest priority treatment. Jews, blacks, pajeets, and anyone who is a Muslim, irrespective of actual race.

Question: Racist? No. Racialist? Yes. Tribalism works quite well for the Jews. Homogeneous ethnicity for the Koreans, Japanese, Chinese, Africans, Arabs, etc. Why should we of European descent not return to it, as well? Why should we not strive for a White nation – a nation by, of, and for those of European descent?

Natural Law

Comment: Unfortunately, no one seemed to address this topic.

From, the post: Natural Law declares that strength prevails over weakness, the capable rise over the incapable, and hierarchy is inherent in every living system. Hierarchies are the natural order of all beings. The strong lead, the fit survives, the talented create, and the race advances through this natural selection.

Question: We have abandoned meritocracy. Everyone gets a trophy – except the white male. He goes to the back of the bus. So, I ask again what I asked in the original post – tell me what’s wrong with the laws of Nature and why should we not adhere to them?

Capitalism

Comment: Profit is what motivates people to do ANYTHING. Nobody works for free. NOBODY. Capitalism is based on exchange. The exchange of time/effort for something if value. Capitalism has been the driving force behind the largest creation of wealth and consumer goods availability in all of history. … and … Certainly the innovative business owner and mom and pop shop variety of capitalism has generated enormous wealth and products that benefited humanity, however private equity and the shareholder dividend at the expense of everything else version is parasitic at best. There are elements of capitalism worth salvaging and others that need to be eradicated.

From the post – Capitalism views human beings as commodities and nations as markets, both of which are viewed as ready and available to exploit. It demands endless growth, open borders for cheap labor, and results in the import of aliens to undercut wages and drive down living standards. It turns land into speculative assets, pricing our own people out of homes and families. It rewards rootless international finance while draining the strength of the nation.

Question: How do we retain a Capitalist economy and free market and erect guardrails to offshoring of manufacturing and replacement of the Folk with foreigners who will work for slave wages? Remember, the corporation has one mission and one mission only – produce profit for the shareholders – at any cost.

Usury

Comment: Interest… another term for usury…is a tool. A financial tool. And like all tools it is neither good nor bad. It’s the use and purpose given to it by people that determines its virtue or lack thereof. … and … Interestingly, usury was a thing scorned by Europeans for most of history, as of late however many see it as something humanity needs to exist. … and … As far as usury, the US functioned without it at the level of the common citizen for a long time. But we also had hard money that wasn’t under constant inflationary pressure as fiat is.

Since many readers are Christian I offer this from Christianity.com – At first, usury indicated the charging of any kind of interest, and in some Christian cultures and even today in many Islamic societies, imposing any interest charges at all is deemed as usury. Throughout history, various domains from ancient Greece to medieval Europe have condemned loans with any interest. However, the Roman Empire ultimately allowed loans with restricted interest rates, and the Catholic Church in medieval Europe forbade the charging of interest at any rate. Religious prohibitions on usury have been asserted within the tenet that charging interest on a loan is a sin.

… and The rich rules over the poor, and the borrower is the slave of the lender. Proverbs 22:7

Since words mean things – The modern definition:

1. The lending or practice of lending money at an exorbitant interest (Credit Card interest, Pay Day Loans?). 
2. An exorbitant amount or rate of interest, especially in excess of the legal rate (Loan Sharks?).

The word usury has arrived in modern English to mean unreasonable interest upon money loaned, either formally illegal or at least oppressive. In the Scriptures, however, the word did not have this purpose but indicated simply interest of any kind upon money. 

Question: If interest is a tool and we reject the biblical prohibition and accept the modern definition, what qualifies as exorbitant? Who decides? Is charging interest even ethically responsible considering the debt slave status of so many locked into high credit card debt?

This, on full stomachs, with all systems working, just for kicks.
Imagine them a week into grid down, starving in the dark with no running water. Grocery stores looted. No EBT, no ATMs, no CCs. They will go full murder cannibal in under 2 weeks. https://t.co/8j6oeun1qz

— Matt Bracken (@Matt_Bracken48) August 17, 2026

Guest post from Radulf:

What is unity? Some might consider it oneness or a totality that combines all parts into one. To others, it is merely an absence of diversity, unvaried, or uniform of character. Other descriptors could include concord, harmony, or agreement. What about continuity without deviation or change? Perhaps it is a sense of singleness or constancy of purpose or action. In short, unity transforms a series of unorganized and independent actions into a group effort bound by guiding principles and focused toward a collective purpose.

How do groups of men, brotherhoods or fraternities, achieve unity? As we know from previous articles, conversations, and discussions, the single basic element of a brotherhood is the individual man. How, then, does a brotherhood achieve unity when each man who comprises the vetted and sworn membership has free will?

On the one hand, leaders cannot simply dictate unity to individual members. To expect this is naïve. To implement such a strategy is foolish and fraught with pitfalls. On the other hand, individual men, no matter their mettle, character, and worth, cannot force unity from below. They might be able to influence others, but over time that influence will wane for lack of foundation.

To achieve unity, men first be bound together. Be it by blood, kinship, ideology, or faith, some form of bond must be attained. Also, men must work as a team. Ah, but is that not a form of unity? Yes and no. A team is merely a demonstration of cooperation. Time, hardship, pain, suffering, and hard work are the tools by which a team gains cohesiveness, and at some point, possibly unity. For a tight-knit group to have unity, it requires personal investment (skin in the game) and loyalty.

Men of the Folk Nation and those who would join must invest themselves in the brotherhood. They must do this with body, mind, and soul, and through blood, sweat, and tears. These may seem like catchy words to represent a lofty and esoteric ideal, but they remain true in their most basic sense. Men must work and toil to make their bodies as strong, resilient, and durable as they can be so they can withstand the hardships that will come. Their minds must be molded and focused on purposeful intent, never wavering. Their souls must be true to their most closely-held beliefs, for these beliefs shape their worldviews and determine their character. Men might also be called upon to shed blood, sweat, and tears, not only for fellow individual brothers but also for the folk as a whole. These are the investments men must make for the folk to be united. Without such an investment, membership is weak and susceptible to fracturing into the shards of yet another group shattered on the rocks of reality.

Then there is the issue of loyalty. Men must be loyal to the group, which means that no matter what decision leadership makes, that is the position of the folk. At this point, all discussion and argument must cease, and the men must remain loyal to the group and its leaders. Also, men must be loyal to their brothers on an individual basis. They must treat their fellow members with both respect and honesty but tempered by tact and love. If problems arise, brothers resolve them and put the issues behind them. There is no room for anger, grudges, or resentment. Finally, men must be loyal to themselves. This means honest assessment and appraisal through deep introspection. Such a process identifies weaknesses, which are then improved upon and eliminated. A man who shirks his duty to eliminate personal weakness is a blight on the fellowship and Folk Nation. He has demonstrated disloyalty to himself, his brothers, and his people.

Why are personal investment and cohesion important? To ignore them is to risk disunity, which breeds resentment and disloyalty. Without personal investment, it is very difficult for a man to be loyal, for he has no “skin in the game,” and he has little worth to the folk. Without loyalty, a man is a wild card and a detriment to the well-being and survivability of the folk. Personal investment and loyalty go hand-in-hand, and they form two very basic expectations when vetting new members. Those who join must be strong and resolute in both, or risk banishment from the group.

For a folk to maintain the course, it must provide purpose to its membership. Guiding principles, an ethos, codes of conduct and honor, a vision, a mission statement, and a campaign plan – these are the vehicles by which we glean purpose. Through purpose, men can unify their effort. They have goals and milestones which measure their success.

As you can see, unity is a two-way street. Leadership provides the purpose and membership provides the effort. In this way, the Folk Nation succeeds and remains united in the face of adversity. But the men must remain focused and strong to avoid the dangers of disunity and the pitfalls of disloyalty.

Unity without loyalty amounts to empty promises.

Loyalty without unity is a shallow and tenuous web of platitudes.

How does a folk achieve unity and loyalty? The answer lies in action, for both unity and loyalty require it. Action means more than mere motion. It requires purpose and intent. Sitting in front of the computer and participating in a chat room is not action. This activity is merely an emotional outlet. The action to which I refer consists of self-improvement, strengthening the bonds between brothers, and working towards the tangible goals for the sake of our people.

Are you up to the challenge? Are you a man of action, resolute in conviction? Or are you a LARPer, playacting, all talk and no action? Get off your ass and man up. The time of the folk is now. Will you participate and contribute or will you simply watch and comment? Decide, for the Folk Nation and its folk waits for no inactive man.

I’d like to thank those who participated in this Thought Exercise. The conclusion is going to be a bit lengthy for a single post, so I’ll stretch it out just a bit.

I’ve listed selected comments from the posts below with a few comments of my own and questions to be considered. First, however, let’s address the role of government; one I think we’d all agree with. The purpose of government is to protect and serve the Folk. Simple, really.

Comment: I don’t want my government to love me or to take care of me. They love me too much already, leave me alone!

Personally, I’m an anarchist. I’d prefer no government at all. If government there must be, my next choice would be tribal – small, clannish, and of the same race and culture. Anything larger and/or more diverse presents problems.

Comment: As several people have pointed out, and I honestly think this applies to all of our conversations … People, are the problem.

As mentioned by E.M. Burlingame, we must deal with the Resentfuls; those who cannot do, and whose envy and avarice simply cause them to act as parasites and destroyers. In a tribe they can simply be banished. Not so easy in a nation.

When I taught at the military academy, the cadets were complaining about the rules. I explained that if they were responsible cadets there’d be no need of rules. Their irresponsibility caused the need. So too, with laws levied by government. They act as guardrails against the irresponsible and Resentfuls.

Comment: You know why peoples knee jerk reaction is always against government??? It’s because they have never lived under a government that actually loves and takes care of it’s people only ones that have oppressed them… It’s like explaining color to a blind man or signing a beautiful song to a deaf person…

This comment seems, to me, the real meat of the subject. I once asked my cadets if they could name a single government, in history, that was good to and for it’s people. They could not. I have one in mind that arguably seemed to fit the bill … maybe, at least motivationally. I’ll save that for later.

As for freedom as it has evolved in the West … we have allowed ‘freedom’ to become anything goes and now we’re just another Weimar Republic. Guardrails, it would seem, are definitely required and we must dramatically reduce our degree of tolerance of the Resentfuls.

Rhetorical Question: How do we establish a government that actually loves and takes care of its people? A government that allows its responsible citizens freedom and yet erects guardrails to protect them from the irresponsible and Resentfuls?

Can we glean any ideas from the planks of the platform we’ve been examining in our exercise? Let’s see.

Graphic courtesy of WRSA

If my life trajectory can teach anyone anything, it’s not to give up hope. Don’t succumb to the darkness and don’t let the darkness consume you. Don’t be influenced by nonsensical voices. Find inner strength and follow a compass with a magnetic pull stronger than the media influences. We can overcome and rebuild. We need to step away from the noise and put our minds in a new ethno-tribal state of awareness, and live as if this is our new reality. If we can do this, our new reality awaits us in real time.

From Oakwise Becoming

From Vox Popoli

Even those pulling the strings of the Short Fat Trump now understand that Asia is a bridge too far for the US military to even pretend it can contest, and it appears they’re now conceding the region to China.

Based on my very good relationship with Kim Jong Un, of North Korea, I am not happy with the fact that the United States has, long ago, agreed to participate in Joint Military Exercises with South Korea. These exercises are not only costly, with much of these costs paid for by the United States of America (as usual!), but send a signal that is totally inappropriate and hostile, to a Country that, as long as Donald J. Trump has been President, has been unthreatening and respectful. Therefore, and based on the fact that it is too late to cancel, I hâve instructed Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, to substantially reduce the Joint Military Exercises! While somewhat unrelated (?), I recently asked the President of South Korea if they would like to join us in the Denuclearization of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and they said, “No thanks!” Thank you for your attention to this matter. President DONALD J. TRUMP

It’s only a matter of time before US troops are withdrawn from South Korea and Japan. Which is a good thing, since the fate of South Korea and its dying population has demonstrated that as bad as communism and Jutism may be, and they are very, very bad, Western liberal values and feminism are even worse for a nation.

The USA now has a single-issue foreign policy.

On the Iranian front, the most interesting item over the transom today are new reports vindicating something many analysts have proposed since the beginning of the conflict. Namely, that US’s naval problems in the theater all stemmed from Iran’s deliberate strategy of wiping out US bases in the region, resulting in the extremely inefficient lengthening of US supply chain logistics for war:

The piece asserts that the US Navy’s problems began immediately after Iran’s opening salvo of the war, which saw the Navy’s top regional logistics hub in Bahrain go up in smoke from Iranian missiles and drones:

The aircraft carrier U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln’s supply problems began soon after the first day of the war, as Iranian missiles and attack drones fell on a Navy base in Bahrain.

The Iranian attack, retaliation for the U.S.-Israeli assault on Tehran, destroyed much of the base. And as it went up in smoke, so did a major logistics hub that the Navy has relied on for decades.

The Navy needed a Plan B to continue feeding the sailors working around the clock to keep warplanes flying strike missions, and later to maintain a blockade of Iran’s ports.

Israeli outlets had previously covered the fact that the Pentagon allegedly launched a ‘secret’ operation to essentially retreat strategic assets from within immediate range of Iranian strikes toward “protected rear hubs”, which stretched an aging and sclerotic US military to the brink.

Continue reading Simplicius …

This system is not simply about the survival of our race, but the elevation and eternal drive to ascend and advance our people to a higher state of being and existence.

White Europeans possess an inherent, natural drive to constantly innovate, improve and develop. Our people have achieved the near impossible and the unfathomable in the past. White excellence has provided the world with countless innovations and inventions. This system codifies this genetic trait of our people into political doctrine.

Everything that we do on this earth and contribute is for those that come after us – the coming man. This philosophy of advancing both society and our blood in an upwards direction is integral to Folk and to healthy societies. Each generation of our people should build on the achievements on the one that came before it and advance our people and nation. Stagnation or decline is unacceptable.

Under liberalism, we have witnessed each generation after Baby Boomers descending downwards, to lesser education, lesser aptitude and ability, and to crushing economic difficulties and hardships. This is the opposite of building a society for the coming man, instead choosing to enrich one generation at the expense of all others.

We must demand eternal ascent. The coming man must be stronger than us now, more capable, more creative and more wise. It is our
responsibility to create him. We should each engage in Becoming … more than we are.

Roth Note: Now tell me what’s wrong with this.

This is the final exercise. Conclusions will follow.

I am starting to delete comments that make people look stupid or try to incite responses for a personal agenda. Use facts and logic to make a comment. Stop wasting our readers time with unfounded speculation.

The family is the building block of the nation. It is the smallest, most natural unit of our people. It is the cradle where the race is born, nurtured, and passed on.

Every individual genius of our race, every leader, every creator, artist, every strong man or woman who advances our folk, emerges from the family. The nuclear family is where blood is carried on, values are instilled, and where loyalty to the collective is first learned.

A strong family produces strong children. Strong children grow to build a strong nation. A weak or broken family weakens the entire racial
community. This system affirms the family as the foundation of everything. It honours motherhood as the highest calling, bearing and raising healthy White children. It protects the family from degeneracy, from economic pressures that delay or prevent children, and from ideologies that undermine the natural roles of man and woman.

Marxism and Liberalism seek to weaken and destroy the family, as a means of subversion to break the racial bonds that we have as a collective, and allow exploitation of our people.

The state, as servant of the race, has a duty to support and enable families with policies that make marriage, children, and home ownership possible for our people. It’s been said, “The family is the nucleus of the nation.”

A nation which neglects its families, decays from its core. With each family, lies the future of our race.

Roth Note: Now tell me what’s wrong with this.

🦸‍♂️🇺🇸 Not all heroes wear capes… pic.twitter.com/wE98xLhxWz

— Jason Bassler (@JasonBassler1) August 16, 2026

BREAKING: US servicemen in the Persian Gulf have scribbled messages on the dust of an aircraft flap, per an image from the field sent to Trita Parsi.

The messages include:

"Be a good goy and do what Israel tells you to"

"Operation Epstein Fury"

"Peace deal #64 incoming…… pic.twitter.com/IRCaltbFOh

— The Hormuz Letter (@HormuzLetter) August 16, 2026

Grok:

Likely a real/valid photograph, not AI-generated.Visual inspection of the image (the same one shared by Trita Parsi and then by

@HormuzLetter) shows strong indicators of authenticity:

• Natural details: Consistent rivets, panel seams, paint wear/scratches, hydraulic elements, and a tire at the bottom. Lighting, shadows, and the clear blue sky match a real outdoor shot on a flight line or ramp.
• Dust writing: The graffiti is messy, uneven, finger-traced in accumulated dust/sand, with varying pressure, smudges, and overlapping marks. This matches real dust writing far better than typical AI text (which often looks too uniform, “font-like,” or has melting/warping artifacts). Phrases match those transcribed (“BiBi’s bucks,” “be a Good goy and do what Israel tells you to!!!,” “Operation Epstein Fury,” “Peace Deal #64 Incoming…. ALL THIS FOR THE HOLY LAND,” “I LOVE ISRAEL I AM A GOOD GOYIM,” “IY Flock Cameras,” etc.).
• Aircraft context: It appears to be a trailing-edge flap or similar control surface on a large military aircraft (gray paint scheme consistent with US assets). Dust/sand buildup on aircraft in the Persian Gulf is well-documented from past operations due to frequent dust storms.

Trita Parsi (a known analyst) posted it earlier the same day stating it “was sent to me from the field,” along with a quoted comment from a serviceman about low morale. The image has no obvious generative-AI tells (distorted anatomy, inconsistent physics, gibberish text, unnatural smoothness, etc.). No reverse-image matches to older stock photos or prior AI examples have surfaced in searches, and the post is only hours old (16 Aug 2026), so no major fact-checks yet exist calling it synthetic.