I doubt anyone would try to debate the merits of voting for the lesser of two evils. What about accepting evil based on a political party? In order to address this question, people would have to abandon any premise of a uniparty.
Let’s address the evil that we know (although some will disagree):
- Fauci and Obama moved gain of function research from Chapel Hill, NC to Wuhan, China.
- The US research funded gain of function in the SARS-COV1 virus which either escaped or was released. This resulted in a pandemic which killed “about 7.12 million people have been recorded as dying of COVID-19 worldwide, based on official reports compiled by the World Health Organization (Grok)”.
- The government hid the research showing hydroxychloroquine as an effective treatment in order to issue a EUA for the vaxx.
- The electoral process in the United States is corrupt. We have no representation in government.
- The Epstein files and their suppression.
- The control of the federal government by Israel. This includes funding 100% of Israeli healthcare, war materiel and fighting their wars.
- The propaganda resulting in the Ukraine war that started with Nuland’s color revolution in 2014.
- The duplicity of Trump’s attack on Iran during negotiations that resulted in the death of Iran’s leader.
- The 2020 Presidential election resulting in the illegal selection of Joe Biden which was actually Obama’s third term.
- The government’s use of NGOs to fund BLM riots across the country.
We could list more evil and the lack of any consequences but the point needs to be discussed: is the government evil, sometimes evil or should we address each instance separately?
I personally am of the opinion is that the government is evil and needs to be held accountable. Accountability would most likely bring down the federal government which is why the Epstein files are being covered up. Or do you believe Trump when he says they are a hoax?
Should we give a pass on evil when the act is represented as being “justified” as the result of the other side’s earlier actions? I will use Iran as an example. Trump was controlled by Israel to attack Iran because of “the nuclear bomb” excuse. Never mind that the leader of Iran (whom Trump killed) issued a fatwa against a nuclear bomb. We say that Iran cannot be trusted because they are Muslims even though only 32% of the country is Muslim. We say that Iran murders it citizens protesting against the nation’s leadership. The protests were organized by the US and used the Kurds as surrogates. The US military bombed a school which killed 120 children and 26 adults. Never mind there were three waves of attacks on the school.
Here is Grok’s analysis of when the Pentagon will release the report on the Minab school attack:
There is no announced release date. As of 17–18 September 2026, the Pentagon still has not published the report and will not give a date.
What is known about the process:
- A preliminary military review was done within about two weeks of 28 February. It concluded a U.S. Tomahawk hit the school because of outdated targeting data (imagery not updated for years; a 2019 analyst note that the building was a school never reached the live target database).
- An outside general, appointed by CENTCOM commander Adm. Brad Cooper, submitted a fuller investigation around April 2026.
- That package then sat at CENTCOM, then with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and the White House. Officials told the Times in June it was “complete and awaiting sign-off.” Hegseth’s line was it would come out “when the appropriate time is right.” NBC reported concern it would be classified and kept from the public.
- In July, two dozen Democratic senators demanded an unclassified version within a week. The Pentagon reply: investigation ongoing, nothing to announce. CNN reported CENTCOM had not even ordered the usual third-stage DIA battle-damage review. Trump said he had not read it and “I don’t think anybody is ever going to be able to say what happened there.”
- On 17 September 2026, the day the UN fact-finding mission called the strikes indiscriminate and likely a war crime, DoD still declined comment except that an investigation was ongoing and it had nothing to announce. The U.S. has not published its own findings.
So: internally the work has been described as finished since spring; public release is blocked at political/command review, with no calendar. Compare Kabul 2021, where the Pentagon claimed the strike and issued details in under a month. There is no credible date to put on a calendar unless Congress forces an unclassified summary (e.g. via NDAA language), which has not happened yet.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
At this point many readers will stop and not care. They are missing the point: it’s not about the school, it’s about the rationalization. Let’s assume that this incident was a mistake, the Pentagon will release a truthful report and the US will apologize if the facts are more than an error.
Do we forget the rest of the evil that the government has done and continues to do? And that is not a rhetorical question. If we negate the tyranny of our government by accepting the premise that one act was justified, the tyranny will continue and it will increase.
This post was not written to change your mind or disregard the good acts of the government. It was written to have you grasp the concept that disregarding evil acts because of mitigating circumstances or other acts of good is not a solution to regain freedom, end evil or gain the Lord’s favor.
