The Answer

I posted an article earlier concerning AI in the hope of getting people to think about what is really going on. This post is the answer that I promised to write later.

The current news on AI is more than dystopian:

  1. Analogies to Skynet.
  2. Rogue Agents in the Internet.
  3. AI elimination of humans in 2032.
  4. Data Centers.
  5. Calls to limit the growth of AI.
  6. Calls for government control of AI.
  7. Agents self-replicating on the Internet.

Which of the above should we be concerned about?

It is the impact of AI on the financial backing and pyramid schemes that is listed at the top of this post.

I am not saying to ignore or minimize the other factors dominating the news cycle for AI. I am saying that the financial mechanizations will result in a bubble that will crash the stock markets. The news concerning the price of energy may couple with this information and October is a possibility for this crash. I suspect this event will happen after the midterm elections: all hell will break loose when the bad news suppressed prior to the elections is released.

Monkey wrenches for the timeframe being expedited:

  1. Japan’s economic collapse.
  2. The fall of Saudi Arabia to Ansarullah and Iran.
  3. Assassinations of high level officials.
  4. The fall of Ukraine.
  5. Israel’s action to bring about Greater Israel.
  6. Iran’s military policy change from one of defense to one of offense.
  7. The collapse of world trade due to war and fuel shortages.
  8. False flags attacks.
  9. European Union attacking Russia.
  10. A Black Swan event.

There is nothing regular people can do except watch. The elections have been thrown to the Democrat party by the Republican party (prove me wrong). Sentient people are realizing that elections are not a valid path forward as the “winners” are selected and nothing will change in our favor. We can however pray for forgiveness from our Father for this government’s transgressions.

5 2 votes
Article Rating

6 responses to “The Answer”

  1. I believe 3 is what concerns me most, they are poisoning our food, water, air and big pharma, and there ultimate killer is AI.

  2. “We can however pray for forgiveness from our Father for this government’s transgressions”

    Absolutely! I truly believe for us common people that IS our only path forward other than preparing. This is the pattern in the Old Testament Judges. When an oppressive government ruled over God’s people, the deliverance from God Himself came only when the people finally were in a place themselves of repentance and so prayed to God for forgiveness, mercy, and deliverance. A serious reading of Psalm 107 shows the same pattern.

    We, each and every one of us, but especially the Men, Must be crying out for deliverance from our evil leaders, all seeking God’s face and putting away any and all personal sins in our own lives, pursuing the Kingdom of God with our whole hearts, and taking seriously the Fact that we wrestle not against flesh and blood But against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. Hence, the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but Mighty through God to the pulling down of strongholds. Our God, The LORD Jesus Christ, does indeed Rule in the Heavens. May we live like we actually believe that by putting away our sins and taking seriously the discipline of Prayer. May His Kingdom come! And may we each be found faithful to the end!!!

    1. General "Buck" Turgedson Avatar
      General “Buck” Turgedson

      I can’t prove you wrong about the election “being thrown.” This is intentional. It was like Trumps first administration, when all of a sudden a boat load of these Mo-Mo’s in the congress decided to ‘retire’ or not run again. This was intentional FYI. It was a protest movement against Trump and it worked. It handed congress over to the communists. Same thing is happening now–but it’s Trump himself who allowed himself to be duped by Israel, or was in the know and cooperated on a deep level with that country knowing full well the outcomes in the very near future. I believe Trump was blackmailed by Israel through his former whore wife who was connected to Epstein–and possibly Trump himself a part of that cabal.

  3. I posit they left early before elections with no intentions of returning.
    Above monkey wrenches and many others only they know about. Belling the cat so to speak.

  4. Excellent analysis. True, I suspect. All of it.

    “The elections have been thrown to the Democrat party by the Republican party (prove me wrong).”

    I’m not disagreeing with the statement above, because I suspect you are right. HOWEVER, we do NOT have to participate in fulfilling that particular prophecy. You know what I mean. We can keep the Republicans in power, despite their best efforts, then hammer them mercilessly to start fixing what they broke. Whether anyone wants to believe it, they start responding when they are inundated with calls and letters from extremely pissed-off constituents.

    We must also remember that we are getting better at messaging, especially since the censorship that defined the Biden Administration is far less now. Not gone, but much less… the best example is X, but there are many others. We no longer have to rely on the MSM, or facebook for our news, which was just indoctrination by another name.

    I do suspect you are correct about October… the inevitable “October Surprise” except it should be a surprise to no one. Everything is stretched so tight that almost anything can push us past the breaking point… a trucker strike starting 01 October, everything that is happening in the Middle East, Oracle going bust, and/or the nearly unrecoverable soaring cost of energy, due partly to the war in Iran, but much more because of the DEMONCRAT-SUPPORTED Ukraine War. Once it breaks, we are faced with another huge pile of debris that will be added to the already
    monstrous pile created by Obama/Biden.

    We must remember that Demoncrats understand economics as well as we do, but their entire goal is to using economic welfare to bring down THIS country and usher in their utopian one-world government, and the only way to do that is to kill as many of us a possible and create untold misery for the survivors, who will DEMAND they fix it. And they will, but we most certainly will not like the fix.

    1. I gave your comment to Grok for its analysis:

      The Founders would reject the premise that one party can “throw” elections to the other as a standing feature of the system. They designed regular elections, staggered terms, and federalism precisely so that no faction could lock in permanent control. Washington’s Farewell Address warned that the spirit of party “agitates the community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms” and “kindles the animosity of one part against another.” They expected both sides to seek power and both sides to abuse it when they held it.

      They would tell the writer that treating Republicans as a tool to be kept in office solely so they can be “hammered” later is still factional thinking. Madison in Federalist 10 argued factions are inevitable because people differ in interests and opinions; the remedy is not to pick a favorite faction and then punish it, but to enlarge the republic so no single group can dominate and to rely on ambition checking ambition. Loyalty to a party label over the Constitution was, to them, a path to the very concentrated power they feared.

      On the “October Surprise,” energy costs, foreign wars, and economic distress, they would distinguish between legitimate grievances and the claim that the opposing party’s entire goal is to “kill as many of us as possible” in service of a one-world government. Jefferson and Adams both wrote that free government requires an informed, temperate public, not a public that assumes the worst motives as first principle. They favored vigorous argument and a free press—Washington and Franklin would recognize the value of platforms less captured by official narrative—but they also expected citizens to demand evidence rather than treat catastrophe as proof of a grand design.

      Their consistent counsel was narrower and less dramatic: vote, petition, hold representatives to the text of the Constitution, and refuse to let either party become an identity. They did not believe one side possessed unique economic wisdom or unique malevolence. They believed both sides would expand government when it suited them, and that the people’s job was to keep every official, regardless of party, within the limits they had written.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

6
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x