Huck Davenport | March 15, 2026 American Thinker

From the essay: Let’s stop pretending: Islam is not a religion in any sense of the word. Love thy neighbor? Hardly. Temperance and self-control? Laughable. Do unto others? Well, maybe, if that doing includes jihad.

The incontestable truth is that Islam is a violent, misogynistic, intolerant political system that has been on a millennium-and-a-half-long global holy war to conquer the globe by conversion, enslavement, and murder. Denial of this basic historical fact is akin to denying the moon landing.

Before the bodies were buried, President Bush had the audacity to quote from the Quran a lie that would dwarf his father’s “read my lips” pledge, proclaiming, “Islam is Peace.” The spectacle was so grotesquely absurd he could have called Pearl Harbor the “Great Pacific Luau” or Hiroshima “Atoms for Mercy” and been closer to the truth.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble …

Nineteenth-century jurisprudence on religion was, of course, more sensible than today’s. After the Edmunds Act made polygamy a felony and required voters to swear they were not polygamists in order to vote, Samuel Davis, a member of the Church of Latter-day Saints and a polygamist, sued on the grounds that the First Amendment’s guarantee of religious freedom made the law unconstitutional.

To the shock of no one in the 19th century, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that religious practices that “shock the moral judgment of the community” are unprotected, and went further to limit religion as “one’s views of his relations to his Creator” and not to “protect against legislation for the punishment of acts inimical to the peace, good order, and morals of society.”

It is hard to imagine anything more inimical to peace than Islam.

Read the entire essay here

Islam is a death cult, not a religion. It must be banned, and eradicated from our nation, if it is to have any chance of survival.

I told Grok that I did not think the war was over. Here is its reply.

You’re right to be skeptical—the US-Iran conflict, including the Strait of Hormuz crisis, shows no signs of resolution as of March 14, 2026. While President Trump has declared a “victory” and called for international partners to help secure the waterway, ongoing Iranian threats, attacks on shipping, and economic disruptions indicate the situation remains volatile and far from over.Key developments highlight the persistence of tensions:

• Iran has partially allowed limited passage for some vessels (e.g., Indian ships) but continues to block or threaten those linked to the US, Israel, or perceived enemies, effectively keeping the Strait disrupted for most commercial traffic. aljazeera.com +1 Shipping insurance rates have surged, and multiple attacks on merchant vessels have been reported in recent days, including a container ship disabled near the Strait. youtube.com +2
• The US has destroyed significant portions of Iran’s navy and conducted strikes on key sites like Kharg Island, but Iran has retaliated with missile and drone attacks, including on US bases and allied infrastructure. en.wikipedia.org +2 Experts note that Iran controls the pace of de-escalation, with reports of potential mining and continued threats to shipping. cfr.org +2
• Trump is pushing for a multinational naval coalition to reopen and patrol the Strait, claiming “many countries” will contribute warships, but implementation is uncertain amid escalating risks. cnn.com +3 US officials like Secretary of War Pete Hegseth have downplayed concerns, but analysts and former officials express doubt, warning that US forces face challenges approaching the area without further losses. youtube.com +2
• Economically, oil prices have exceeded $100 per barrel at points, with global ripple effects like a 23% spike in US gas prices. cnn.com +1 The crisis, part of the broader war starting February 28, has no clear end date, and assumptions of a quick US win or Iranian capitulation have not held. en.wikipedia.org +1

Public sentiment on X echoes this uncertainty, with users questioning the US victory narrative and noting Iran’s ability to sustain disruptions despite naval losses. If a coalition forms and secures safe passage, it could ease pressures, but Iran’s threats of more strikes suggest escalation remains a real possibility.

Final analysis:

Without mitigations like continuous monitoring, adaptive retraining, or diverse data sourcing, the likelihood approaches 90%+ for most models within months to years. However, well-maintained systems (e.g., via MLOps practices) can reduce this to near zero, as degradation is largely a solvable engineering problem rather than an inescapable fate. In critical applications like healthcare or finance, unchecked degradation could lead to biased decisions or systemic failures, underscoring the need for robust oversight.

Two case histories:

The first case is one of many documented examples of Internet hacking of American infrastructure:

Chinese hackers recently spent nearly a year deep inside a public power utility in Littleton, Massachusetts. U.S. officials said it was part of a large-scale plan to destabilize American infrastructure in the event of a future conflict. Hackers linked to Iran previously breached several U.S. municipal water utilities as well. Now over 50,000 public water treatment plants across the United States are hoping to stop attacks like that from happening to them.

More…

The second case involves using AI agents to reverse engineer websites:

There are several documented cases where AI agents have been used to reverse engineer corporate or corporate-like websites, often for purposes like understanding functionality, identifying vulnerabilities, or analyzing strategies. These typically involve AI-driven tools that interact with the site’s UI, APIs, network traffic, or content without direct access to the source code. Below are some real-world examples based on reported experiments and applications. Note that these are often conducted in controlled or ethical contexts, such as research or security testing, and reverse engineering can raise legal and ethical considerations depending on the intent and permissions. (Grok)

We are used to the term “ransomware” where a group of people break into a site to blackmail an institution or government agency to regain control of their information. Hacking includes breaking into systems with sleeper agents that launch coordinated attacks on the infrastructure of a country at very little cost.

What would I do to attack an enemy? I would use AI agents to identify infrastructure that is vital for local resources such as water, sewer and electrical utilities as shown in the second case outlined above. Transportation (trucking, railroad and airlines) would also be identified. I would then direct AI agents to find backdoors or administrative passwords to give me control whenever the time is “appropriate” to launch a coordinated shutdown.

I am not writing this as a suggestion for a course of action: I am writing this to warn people that this is already done. We have seen too many examples over the past twenty years with hackers.

Over 11 billion records exposed since 2005, with costs in the trillions (e.g., $4.1B for healthcare alone in 2012). (Grok)

Why would we assume that they did not make their task easier with AI agents? Then again, one EMP could still take down our electrical grid since Congress did not authorize any hardening of our system.