Huck Davenport | March 15, 2026 American Thinker
From the essay: Let’s stop pretending: Islam is not a religion in any sense of the word. Love thy neighbor? Hardly. Temperance and self-control? Laughable. Do unto others? Well, maybe, if that doing includes jihad.
The incontestable truth is that Islam is a violent, misogynistic, intolerant political system that has been on a millennium-and-a-half-long global holy war to conquer the globe by conversion, enslavement, and murder. Denial of this basic historical fact is akin to denying the moon landing.
Before the bodies were buried, President Bush had the audacity to quote from the Quran a lie that would dwarf his father’s “read my lips” pledge, proclaiming, “Islam is Peace.” The spectacle was so grotesquely absurd he could have called Pearl Harbor the “Great Pacific Luau” or Hiroshima “Atoms for Mercy” and been closer to the truth.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble …
Nineteenth-century jurisprudence on religion was, of course, more sensible than today’s. After the Edmunds Act made polygamy a felony and required voters to swear they were not polygamists in order to vote, Samuel Davis, a member of the Church of Latter-day Saints and a polygamist, sued on the grounds that the First Amendment’s guarantee of religious freedom made the law unconstitutional.
To the shock of no one in the 19th century, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that religious practices that “shock the moral judgment of the community” are unprotected, and went further to limit religion as “one’s views of his relations to his Creator” and not to “protect against legislation for the punishment of acts inimical to the peace, good order, and morals of society.”
It is hard to imagine anything more inimical to peace than Islam.
Islam is a death cult, not a religion. It must be banned, and eradicated from our nation, if it is to have any chance of survival.
6 responses to “Congress Can Constitutionally Define Religion To Exclude Jihad”
congress can do lots of pro American citizen stuff for the benefit of American citizens. They choose to do little, or lots of anti American citizen stuff. IMHO. Remember, Ted Cruz says “Christ is King” is anti semetic!?
Islam is a competing form of government, explicitly anti-democratic. The communist parties of Europe claim to support democracy and campaign to be voted into power; Islam does not bother with such a fig leaf. Muslims who sincerely believe in democracy are not practicing as the Koran teaches, and are subject to condemnation by their co-religionists.
We have no obligation to tolerate advocates of a competing form of government here.
A very large group of people here with American accents and American passports and fond memories of July 4 parades *and* voting rights here disagree with the above. What will it take to convince them?
Serious question: Did the term “religion” have the same meaning in 18th Century Americas as it does now? Therein lies the answer. Webster’s 1828 Dictionary indicates it probably did. However if the Founders meant strictly the Christian “denominations” exclusively in the term, then everything changes.
Now do Chabad.
Yes, please. “Love thy neighbor? Hardly. Temperance and self-control? Laughable. Do unto others?”
I could ask the same of Christian Zionists. Charlemagne murdered over 4,000 of my ancestors in Saxony for failing to covert to an Abrahamist religion. Now all the Abrahamists , be they Jew, Christian, or Muslim, seem intent on helping God bring in the Mashiach, Messiah, or Mahdi. The Apocalypse.
My ancestors saw God as the mind of Nature and Nature as the body of God. Would that we had won the argument. Then, perhaps, we’d not be attempting to ‘help’ God end the world.
May whatever God you pray to save us from this insanity.
I disagree.
Islam is organized crime.