Latest Articles

  • British Police

  • Starmer Resigns

  • Israeli Policy

  • It Seems the Country Is Devolving into Chaos

  • The Curse of Consciousness

  • Trump Unhinged

  • The Seed That Alfred’s Fathers Planted

    Fathers. And you who would be fathers. On this day I bring you no new words. What I must say to every man who still feels the old fire in his chest, I would have said yesterday and will say again tomorrow. But upon this field of battle forming before us, I will speak it plainly now.

    Honor them now. All of them, yours and his and his, all the way back.

    Honor the fathers who stood shield to shield in the shieldwall, who swung the axe at Hastings and lost, yet bent the Norman storm to the old ways and made the conqueror speak their law. Honor the fathers who fought through the Wars of the Roses, English blood on English steel, a family quarrel that tore the land apart and yet birthed a stronger order. Honor the fathers of the Civil War who, in a foreign fueled and funded bloody brothers war, nearly ended what their fathers had wrought. Honor the fathers who crossed the gray Atlantic with nothing but that seed and their own two hands and planted it in new soil, where the Common Man, great and small alike, became the living foundation of nations.

    Honor the fathers who bled on a hundred fields from the Somme to the Ardennes, who stormed the beaches of Normandy, who raised the flag on Iwo Jima, who held the line at Kapyong and Khe Sanh. Honor the fathers of the long Cold War, who stood the watch through decades of shadow and proxy, in Berlin and Korea and a thousand places that never made the history books. Honor the fathers of the Global War on Terror, who put on the armor again after the towers fell and fought in the dust of Fallujah, the valleys of Kunar, the streets of Sadr City, who came home in flag-draped coffins or with invisible wounds, and whose sons now wear the same uniform.

    And honor, too, the fathers fighting today’s near-invisible wars—the men of law enforcement who walk the thin line in our own streets, who wear the badge while their families pray they come home, who face an enemy that does not mass on a border but hides in plain sight, organized crime and those radicalized by ideologies that hate everything we are. Honor the men of counterinsurgency and intelligence, the fathers who cannot tell their children where they go or what they do, who fight the quiet, grinding war against those who would hollow us out from within. These are not separate struggles. They are one war, stretching back to Alfred’s marshes, and the men who wage it have always been fathers, or the sons of fathers who taught them what it costs to be a man.

    Continue reading E.M. Burlingame

  • Family Friendly Festival

  • Charlotte

  • A Macabre Game – Early Christianity vs. The Church

    A piece of bread is declared to be the body of a sacrificial victim.

    A chalice holds the blood of an executed man.

    People kneel to take part in a ritual whose central symbols are death, sacrifice, and redemption.

    Viewed through the eyes of an outsider, it does not seem holy. It seems eerie.

    Over centuries, the Church has built a massive edifice out of these images—not of stone alone, but of dogmas, rules, and authority. Where there may once have been a direct spiritual experience, an institution emerged. Where there were questions, answers were prescribed. Where there was a quest, obedience took its place.

    And so, millions of people wear the image of a dying man around their necks. Not a laughing teacher. Not a seeker. Not a person calling for inner freedom. But a tortured man. A body nailed to the wood.

    An instrument of torture became a holy symbol. How strange that actually is. Imagine another culture building its identity around the public execution of a human being.

    Would we recognize spirituality in that?

    Or would we speak of a morbid cult?

    Perhaps a deeper truth about religion and power reveals itself here:

    Whoever controls the interpretation of guilt also controls the interpretation of redemption.

    For millennia, people have been told that something fundamental is wrong with them. That they have fallen. That they are guilty. That they must be saved. An institution that places itself between the individual and redemption thereby becomes indispensable. For whoever first convinces people of their neediness can subsequently offer them the path to salvation.

    That is how dependency arises. Not through chains. But through articles of faith. Perhaps this is the Church’s true masterstroke:

    Not to liberate people, but to convince them that freedom is possible only through the Church itself. The history of Christianity might originally have been an invitation to inner transformation. The history of the Church, by contrast, often became a matter of managing guilt.

    The one turns the gaze inward. The other directs it toward authorities.

    The one asks questions. The other proclaims.

    The one seeks truth. The other claims to already possess it.

    But what if the great mystics never came to explain people’s unworthiness to them? What if they came to remind them of their dignity?

    Then the true tragedy would not be the crucifixion of a human being. But rather the centuries-long transformation of a potential teaching of liberation into a system of spiritual dependency.

    Then spirituality would not be redemption from innate guilt. But rather liberation from the very idea of ​​having been born guilty.

    And perhaps the true search begins exactly where symbols lose their power.

    When no institution stands between the individual and the truth.

    Then only the quiet and uncomfortable question remains:

    Who am I when no one tells me anymore who I am supposed to be?

    Perhaps therein lies the deeper message of many historical symbols: their original purpose was not to divide people, but to serve as a reminder of a unifying bond greater than any party, any ideology, or any flag.

    Huter der Irminsul

  • Repent

    I’ve got one word for every Christian Zionist, every “Judeo-Christian”, and every Christian who “supports Israel”.

    Repent.

    This isn’t AI or a misinterpretation. I thought it might be an exaggeration, so I went and looked it up. You can see it for yourself. What she actually said is arguably even worse, although she didn’t use the word “holocaust of Gaza” but “the ruins of Gaza”.

    “I am personally proud of the ruins of Gaza, and that every baby, even 80 years from now, will tell their grandchildren what the Jews did when they murdered their families, raped them and kidnapped their citizens! Neither a dove nor an olive leaf, only a sword – to cut off Sinwar’s head!”

    And to anyone who says “oh, well that was just one Jew, mouthing off two years ago” I will point out that a) May Golan is a current Israeli Cabinet member, b) she was literally reading a written speech in her official capacity as an Israeli government minister, and c) I am still being banned from various platforms and organizations for a single misquoted response to a very public racist attack on white people from 2013. So don’t even try that excuse.

    In fact, it’s more than a bit ironic that for at least the last 15 years, we on the right have been relentlessly pilloried for our “extremism” in seeking to ensure that our nations, cultures, languages, and Christian faith survive intact and were falsely accused of being “Nazis” while the mainstream media has not only overlooked, but actively covered for the perpetration of an active ethnic cleansing that has now turned into a literal genocide.

    As for the Israeli Minister of Social Equality, I would merely observe that she will very likely get what she wishes for. People will tell their grandchildren exactly what the Jews did for many generations to come, not only with regards to Gaza, but also with regards to the USA and Europe. And I have no doubt that her great-grandchildren, if she has any, will claim, falsely, that it is a blood libel and an antisemitism to do so.

    It’s an interesting shift of the Overton Window, though, for Jews to go from denying the Gazacaust to a) openly admitting their responsibility for it and b) declaring they are both responsible for, and proud of, “the ruins of Gaza”. One wonders what other historical events exist for which they will eventually be sufficiently emboldened to publicly claim responsibility.

    Besides, of course, the crucifixion of Jesus Christ of Nazareth.

    From Vox Popoli

    It’s fascinating to see how the definition of antisemitism is now being expanded to include accurately quoting something that a Jew has said about his genuine intentions, motivations, and objectives. Especially when we’re now reaching the stage that a comparison of current Israeli rhetoric with historical National Socialist rhetoric is unfair to the latter, as evidenced by the recent genocidal rantings of Israeli National Security Minister Ben-Gvir:

    Continue reading related post …

  • GOP Rodeo in Georgia

  • Being a Father


    Not just a provider.
    Not just someone fulfilling a role.
    Not the man who comes home in the evening and sits tiredly on the sofa.

    A father.

    The word carries more weight than most realize.

    In the old world, the father was the first person a child observed.
    The first whose stance burned itself into memory.
    The first whose voice gave shape—or left wounds.

    The father was the gateway between the child and the world.

    Today, fatherhood is downplayed.
    As if it were optional.
    As if mere presence were enough.

    But presence without a true stance is emptiness.

    A child does not need a perfect man.
    It needs a real man.

    One who stands firm when the storm rages.
    One who shows the way—rather than preaching.
    One who looks the child in the eye and says: I am here.

    This is the oldest role in the world.

    And it does not begin with the birth of the child.
    It begins with you.

    With the question of who you are—when no one is watching.

    — Richard the White Wolf

  • How Did We Let This Happen?

  • The Twilight Zone in America

Menu

CADD Graphics

Laser Engraving by CADD Graphics

Carolina Readiness Supply

Social Media and Websites

NC Renegade on Twitter
NC Renegade on Gab
NC Renegade on Truth Social
Wes Rhinier on Gab


12 Round Blog
Barnhardt
Cold Fury
The Feral Irishman
Hammer’s Thor
Knuckledraggin My Life Away
Liberty’s Torch
90 Miles From Tyranny
Publius-Huldah’s Blog
Smoky Mountain Myco
Straight Line Logic
The Tactical Hermit
Western Rifle Shooters Association

Recent Comments

  1. Afrikaans were a minority in S.A. Amerikaners are a majority in the fUSA. No guarantee of success, but a sign…