They walk among us. https://t.co/7HysdUuNVM pic.twitter.com/PkUHcT7igg

— The White House (@WhiteHouse) May 28, 2026

Trump is using this as an analogy to remove illegal aliens. Another faux pas on this administration.

It’s not your imagination …

Snow White? Right …

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences formalized this bias with its “Representation and Inclusion Standards” for Best Picture eligibility. Starting with the 96th Oscars in 2024, films must meet at least two of four detailed standards, backed by a confidential Academy Inclusion Standards form (RAISE).

These rules prioritize “underrepresented” groups — defined to include women, racial or ethnic minorities, LGBTQ+ individuals, and the disabled or deaf — across every level of production.

Standard A: On-Screen Representation, Themes and Narratives
To qualify, a film needs at least one of these: A lead or significant supporting actor from an underrepresented racial or ethnic group. At least 30% of actors in minor and supporting roles from at least two underrepresented groups. A main storyline or theme centered on an underrepresented group.

Standard B: Creative Leadership and Project Team. At least two creative leadership or department head positions filled by underrepresented groups (with at least one from an underrepresented racial or ethnic group). At least six other key crew or technical positions from underrepresented groups. At least 30% of the overall crew from at least two underrepresented groups.

Standard C: Industry Access and Opportunities focuses on paid apprenticeships, internships, and training programs targeted at preferred demographics. Standard D: Audience Development requires multiple senior executives or consultants from underrepresented groups in marketing, publicity, and distribution.

Continue reading …

At some point every Holocaust museum will be forced to include an exhibit on what’s happening in Gaza right now. It’s only a matter of time. Dr. Nick Maynard of Oxford University medical school has been a witness to the genocide. pic.twitter.com/HyopLlE72A

— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) May 28, 2026

A. Recognition

The first duty is to see clearly. The Whig history that called Charles I a tyrant and James II a fool has become the official narrative of the managerial state. It is taught in every university, repeated in every newspaper, enforced by every social sanction—in London, in Toronto, in Sydney, in Auckland, and everywhere the Anglosphere’s institutions have been captured. To resist it is not “disinformation” but the recovery of truth—truth that has been buried but not destroyed, suppressed but not extinguished. The reasonable man must begin by seeing that the history he was taught is a lie, and that the institutions he was taught to revere are the engines of his enslavement.

B. Refusal

The second duty is to withdraw consent where consent is no longer owed. This is not revolution in the French sense—not the storming of barricades, not the beheading of kings. It is the ancient common law right of salus populi suprema lex: when the state abandons its side of the contract, the subject is released. The withdrawal of consent may be as small as refusing a mandate, as local as withdrawing from the public schools, as quiet as moving one’s savings from a bank that funds destruction. Great revolutions are composed of small refusals, multiplied across a population, sustained over time. This holds true whether the state in question is English, Irish, Canadian, Australian, or New Zealander.

C. Reconstruction

The third duty is to build, even in the midst of collapse. Parallel institutions—common law courts that remember the old procedures, local exchanges that bypass the financial system, family‑based education that passes the tradition to the young, mutual aid that cares for its own without asking leave of the state—these are not fantasies. They are the seeds of a restoration. The reasonable man does not wait for the state to reform itself. He builds, in the spaces that remain, the world he wishes to inhabit. And he does this not only in his own locality but in fellowship with reasonable men across the entire Anglosphere, for the enemy is global and so must be the resistance.

D. Vigilance Without Despair

The reasonable man does not need to win every battle. He does not need to see restoration in his own lifetime. He needs only to ensure that the tradition survives to the next generation—that his sons and daughters know what he knew, remember what he remembered, and are prepared to do what he did when their own crisis comes. Progress is not linear, though the Whig historians pretend it is. It is the rhythm of overreach and self‑correction, of usurpation and restoration, of the parasite’s growth and the organism’s immune response. The present overreach is the greatest yet. So, likely, will be the correction.

E. The Duty to Stand and Fight

There remains a final duty: to stand and fight as our ancestors have stood before us—not in wrath, not in ruin, not in disloyalty, but in full faith and loyalty to our long history, our civilization, and our peoples wherever they dwell in the Anglosphere, and to a good and faithful leader whether he be a president or a king. The reasonable man fights without wrath (that is for revolutionaries), without seeking ruin (he builds, he does not burn), and without breaking faith with the living, the dead, and the yet unborn. When a faithful leader stands, he stands with him; when none stands, he stands with his fellow Englishman. But stand he must. The elites always push. The reasonable man always stands. That is the pattern. That is the duty. That is the inheritance.
Read the entire post …

What follows is argument for Folkishness as opposed to Universalism and is taken from the works of Imperium Press and Tristan Powers. The readers will answer for themselves what seems most correct in their own understanding.

Factualism points out that if you want to reason, you have to start with a brute fact, and that this brute fact is neither analyzable by nor derived from reason. In other words, an axiom. But where do we get axioms? Most people don’t think about this at all, but when we scratch below the surface, we find something highly disturbing. In fact, the simple idea behind factualism upends all metaphysics, epistemology, and morality—it reorders the traditional priority of those disciplines. It also entails folkishness in a way that fully rules out liberalism.

Where do you get your brute facts, that “something” at the very beginning? Not from reason, by definition. The short answer is that you get it from some authority.

So, you have to start from assumptions you were handed. We call that tradition. Tradition is simply the accumulated authoritative commands of a people. To evaluate the question “which authority” you need to lean on authority anyway—the authority of your tradition.

So, to boil it down to its basic elements:

• Authority is unquestionable
• The question “which authority?” is identical to the question “which folk?”

At the end of the day, reason is governed by custom, which is just to say, reason is subordinate to folkishness, the particularity of a people.

Commands come from authority. The proper authority belongs to one’s father. His authority is passed down from his father and his from his father. The particularity of a people (folk) includes the authority of the fathers; ultimately the oldest father. This can be summed up with the fundamental maxim as follows: “The most authoritative command is the eldest legible command.” The Ancestral Principle (the authoritative commands of a people/tradition) places ultimate authority in the eldest ancestor.

The fact that we’ve been off-track for a long time hardly matters. Ancient error is still error. Ancient anti-authoritarianism is still anti-authoritarianism. The ancestral principle is simply the recognition that you don’t get to choose your own authority. Your forefathers didn’t get to choose their own authority either. All morality and even all knowledge rests on this principle. If the principle seems new, that’s because your tradition has been anti-authoritarianism for a long time. The ancestral principle is not new, but simply the articulation of something that was once so obvious that it never needed articulation.

All Indo-European peoples and religions share a common paternal origin and ultimate source such that we may think of it as a single overarching family structure of mutually related religious expressions, but this is a system both exclusive and particular to our people. It is explicitly not a universalist belief system intended for “humanity.”

The call to obey the Fathers is demonstrably itself, the oldest commanding authority …

Source …

Additional source …

Additional source …

“Our ancestors established laws and customs which we must follow as if they were divine commands, for nothing new should be introduced that departs from their wisdom.”

— Cicero, “De Legibus”

“All new things done contrary to the custom of our ancestors are not considered right.”

— Censorial edict of Suetonius, 92BC

“We must preserve the rites and customs of our fathers, for in them lies the strength of our state; to adopt foreign novelties is to invite ruin.”

— Livy, “Ab Urbe Condita”

“The greatness of Rome stems from adhering to the ways of our ancestors, not from embracing every new fashion.”

— Pliny the Elder, “Naturalis Historia”

“A state ought not to be considered happy or stable if it departs from the institutions of its fathers.”

— Aristotle

“We are the ancient ones, and our anger is just; let no new law overturn the old.”

— Aeschylus, “Eumenides”

“We must act kata ta patria (according to our forefathers) and the laws of our ancestors, not follow the whims of the moment.”

—Demosthenes, “De Corona”

“He acted not kata ta patria but according to his own will, thus profaning the customs of our fathers.”

— Lysias, “Against Nicomachus”

“Our city has grown great because it follows ta patria established by our ancestors, not the fleeting fashions of others.”

— Isocrates, “Panegyricus”

“We should judge by kata ta patria, for the customs of our fathers are our strength.”

— Thucydides, “History of the Peloponnesian War”

With everything we are hearing right now about ticks this seems like good information to share.

“Here’s what I’ve learned after more ticks than I care to count.
First, whatever your uncle told you, forget it. No matches. No nail polish. No Vaseline. No soap on a cotton ball.… pic.twitter.com/h56zL1tQRq

— Michelle Maxwell ™ (@MichelleMaxwell) May 28, 2026

After tireless struggle by victims and finally a 1-hour TV documentary this week, settlements south of Jerusalem admit their leaders have long created child pornography by filming when they gang-rape kids in the community: "No longer in denial: Gush Etzion admits to ritual abuse" pic.twitter.com/B1hz0ngMSp

— David Sheen (@davidsheen) May 27, 2026

From Grok:

The post’s headline reference (“No longer in denial: Gush Etzion admits to ritual abuse”) and description of the documentary triggering the admission accurately reflect the Israeli media coverage and the council’s own statement. The mention of filming creating child pornography aligns with the documentary’s references to recordings of the abuse.

British surgeon who operated on Palestinians in Gaza, tells Tucker Carlson how the Israelis would deliberately shoot starving male children in the testicles, shoot vulnerable pregnant women in their stomachs, and let new born babies die in incubators – leaving their tiny bodies… pic.twitter.com/OBbJGDYSsr

— The Muslim Mum (@TheMumMuslim) May 28, 2026

Absolute horror. Prominent Dr. Nick Maynard confirms the Zionist military systematically executed over 300 civilians and medical staff at Shifa Hospital.

He reveals his own colleague was found handcuffed and shot in the head. Washington is funding pure state terrorism! https://t.co/p4hLbcUY1H pic.twitter.com/UaOazo5uZz

— Furkan Gözükara (@FurkanGozukara) May 28, 2026

Analysis from Grok:

This work is a concrete step toward integrated quantum optics where atoms become programmable elements inside photonic processors. It bridges two leading platforms and makes chip-scale hybrid systems more realistic.

🚨 SCIENTISTS JUST TRAPPED A SINGLE ATOM ON A PHOTONIC CHIP AND IT COULD CHANGE QUANTUM COMPUTING FOREVER.

Researchers at Quantum Source and the Weizmann Institute have successfully trapped a single rubidium atom just 150–200 nanometers from a photonic resonator on a chip.… pic.twitter.com/ySN9i9aGmo

— TheNewPhysics (@CharlesMullins2) May 28, 2026

Time Frames (Realistic Outlook) Quantum technologies have long, uncertain timelines due to scaling, error correction, and integration challenges. This is an early but enabling lab result (C > 1 is a key threshold; paths exist to C > 30 via lower-loss resonators, photonic crystals, and better fabrication).

• 2026 (Current): Fundamental proof-of-concept. Single-atom trapping + coupling demonstrated. Quantum Source plans first deliveries of its ORIGIN deterministic resource-state generator (core building block for photonic QC) to select partners by end of 2026. forbes.com
• 2027–2030 (Near-term Prototypes): Multi-atom arrays on chips, improved cooperativity and lifetimes, basic photon-atom gates or small hybrid operations. Early commercial modules or enhanced photonic systems. Initial NISQ-era uses in research, optimization, simulation, or specialized quantum communication prototypes. Quantum Source targets general availability and scaling progress in this window.
• Early-to-Mid 2030s (Useful Systems): Larger integrated hybrid processors or network nodes. Fault-tolerant demonstrations in photonic or hybrid architectures become plausible as error correction matures. Practical applications emerge in quantum chemistry simulation, materials discovery, secure networks, and hybrid classical-quantum workflows. Market projections show strong growth in photonic quantum tech through this period.
• Mid-to-Late 2030s+ (Mature Scale): Million-qubit-class systems (per ambitious visions like Quantum Source’s), full quantum internet infrastructure, and widespread industrial use. Full fault tolerance across platforms remains a multi-year engineering effort even with accelerators like this interface.

🚨 SCIENTISTS MAY HAVE FOUND A WAY TO STOP BLINDNESS BEFORE VISION IS LOST.

Researchers have developed a new laser-based treatment that gently heats the back of the eye not to destroy tissue, but to activate the eye’s own repair systems.

The target is dry age-related macular… pic.twitter.com/DZkytxYUXK

— TheNewPhysics (@CharlesMullins2) May 28, 2026

🚨 SCIENTISTS ARE USING AI TO MAP A HIDDEN “CLEANING SYSTEM” INSIDE THE HUMAN BRAIN AND IT COULD CHANGE HOW WE UNDERSTAND SLEEP, AGING, AND NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASE.

It’s called the glymphatic system a vast network of fluid channels that flushes toxic waste from the brain… pic.twitter.com/i20sEMc9dD

— TheNewPhysics (@CharlesMullins2) May 28, 2026

The AI numbers are starting to look very ugly.

Even under "best case" assumptions, FT's own data shows Microsoft AI ROI at -9%, Google at -15%, Meta at -28%, Oracle at -35%. Only Amazon barely comes out positive.

This is exactly why I keep comparing this to the dot-com era.… pic.twitter.com/O9Sfaya5Oa

— Yoshik (@AskYoshik) May 28, 2026

From Grok:

The specific numbers and the existence of the FT/Panmure Liberum analysis are factually correct and widely referenced (including in recent X discussions). These are estimates based on public capex plans and assumptions about future revenue — reality could turn out better (or worse) depending on how quickly and profitably AI is adopted at scale.

🇮🇱 "I'm not so sure that we will have as easy a time with the Turks as we've had with the Iranians. We have to be prepared for the next war, which will probably be against Türkiye and Egypt."

That's Jonathan Pollard, American-born Israeli spy convicted in 1987 for passing… pic.twitter.com/PZwZcvB99i

— DD Geopolitics (@DD_Geopolitics) May 28, 2026

DHS JUST PUBLISHED THE EXACT LIST OF AIRPORTS THEY WILL SHUT DOWN IF SANCTUARY CITIES REFUSE TO COOPERATE

Not vague threats. Not "we'll look into it." NAMED FACILITIES. SPECIFIC AIRPORTS. City by city.

🇺🇸 JFK — New York City's primary international gateway → customs processing… pic.twitter.com/3l9Fb4kamy

— 🇺🇸 Ronald Carter (@USronaldcarter) May 28, 2026

In Egyptian mythology there are two serpents, Atum and Apophis, one to create out of chaos, the other to return to chaos. Germanic mythology offers a similar idea in the struggle between Thor/Donar (order) and Jormungandr (chaos). In our day, we wonder why the Left and most third-world invaders seem determined to destroy our civilization. To take and to destroy. Why white people, who have built ordered Western Civilization, are being systematically replaced by those who sow chaos. Burlingame recognizes this struggle as an eternal war. He writes:

The Two Classes: Resentfuls and Responsibles

Humanity’s divided into two hereditary, genetically coded classes (roughly half the population, with the other half being the malleable masses in the middle, the Adoptables):

Resentfuls: Motivated by deep-rooted envy, leading to malevolence. They see the world as inherently unfair and seek power through control, coercion, deceit, and destruction of systems. Their compulsion is to enslave and consume Adoptables while waging total war against Responsibles and the Game itself. They view relationships as zero-sum power struggles.

Responsibles: Motivated by deep-rooted gratitude, leading to responsibility. They accept the world as it is — difficult and complex — and seek to sustain and expand the Game through innovation, collaboration, and mutual benefit. Their compulsion is to draw more Adoptables into skilled, sustainable participation in the Game.

Adoptables (the pivotal ~50% of any population) aren’t hardwired to either side. They’re the battleground. Resentfuls seek to radicalize them into resentment and dependency; Responsibles seek to empower them through gratitude, relationships, and upward mobility. Adoptables’ alignment determines whether the War or the Game dominates at any moment. They’re also the primary source of raw, real-world innovation born from the necessity of surviving.

Doctrine alone doesn’t win battles. Lines of Effort (LoEs) translate principles and rules into actionable, context-specific strategies at strategic, operational, and tactical levels.

• Resentfuls have long operated from Saul Alinsky-style LoEs: power from money/people, ridicule as a weapon, make the enemy live up to its rules, etc.
• Responsibles must develop and adhere to their own explicit LoEs: emphasize relationships over money, deny psychological warfare tactics, restore forgiveness and Classical Liberalism, evolve the Game rapidly in a virtualizing world, etc.

Continue reading …