Thought Exercise Conclusion 1 of 5

I’d like to thank those who participated in this Thought Exercise. The conclusion is going to be a bit lengthy for a single post, so I’ll stretch it out just a bit.

I’ve listed selected comments from the posts below with a few comments of my own and questions to be considered. First, however, let’s address the role of government; one I think we’d all agree with. The purpose of government is to protect and serve the Folk. Simple, really.

Comment: I don’t want my government to love me or to take care of me. They love me too much already, leave me alone!

Personally, I’m an anarchist. I’d prefer no government at all. If government there must be, my next choice would be tribal – small, clannish, and of the same race and culture. Anything larger and/or more diverse presents problems.

Comment: As several people have pointed out, and I honestly think this applies to all of our conversations … People, are the problem.

As mentioned by E.M. Burlingame, we must deal with the Resentfuls; those who cannot do, and whose envy and avarice simply cause them to act as parasites and destroyers. In a tribe they can simply be banished. Not so easy in a nation.

When I taught at the military academy, the cadets were complaining about the rules. I explained that if they were responsible cadets there’d be no need of rules. Their irresponsibility caused the need. So too, with laws levied by government. They act as guardrails against the irresponsible and Resentfuls.

Comment: You know why peoples knee jerk reaction is always against government??? It’s because they have never lived under a government that actually loves and takes care of it’s people only ones that have oppressed them… It’s like explaining color to a blind man or signing a beautiful song to a deaf person…

This comment seems, to me, the real meat of the subject. I once asked my cadets if they could name a single government, in history, that was good to and for it’s people. They could not. I have one in mind that arguably seemed to fit the bill … maybe, at least motivationally. I’ll save that for later.

As for freedom as it has evolved in the West … we have allowed ‘freedom’ to become anything goes and now we’re just another Weimar Republic. Guardrails, it would seem, are definitely required and we must dramatically reduce our degree of tolerance of the Resentfuls.

Rhetorical Question: How do we establish a government that actually loves and takes care of its people? A government that allows its responsible citizens freedom and yet erects guardrails to protect them from the irresponsible and Resentfuls?

Can we glean any ideas from the planks of the platform we’ve been examining in our exercise? Let’s see.

0 0 votes

Article Rating

Roth Harbard

August 17, 2026

Uncategorized

Published by

Roth Harbard

5 responses to “Thought Exercise Conclusion 1 of 5”

Lineman

August 17, 2026 at 1:59 pm

Personally, I’m an anarchist. I’d prefer no government at all. If government there must be, my next choice would be tribal – small, clannish, and of the same race and culture. Anything larger and/or more diverse presents problems.

I am not an anarchist because I understand human nature and know that it would be constant chaos until a strong charismatic man(good or evil) installed a monarchy or another form of government…I am a realist that understands if everyone was content to live as tribal members and we all had pretty much the same area that provided the same(calories, weather, geography, and we were all the same race with like abilities as each so none lacked anything well then maybe it would work but even then I doubt it because of our natures of envy, resentment, jealousy, etc, etc…So because of that we need a form of government to protect our folk from the people who hate us and want us dead who outnumber us by an amount that seems almost impossible to overcome even if we had every White person on our side and we don’t even have 50%…The biggest problem we face as a folk(those who are Pro White) is the inability to self reflect and be honest with themselves and with others…If we could fix that then we might be on our way to winning but if we don’t then I would say look forward to hell on earth until you pass onto the next phase of your life…

Reply
1. Roth Harbard
  
  August 17, 2026 at 2:23 pm
  
  You hit the nail on the head. I recognize that my personal preferences are unworkable in the current age. We went from clans to tribes to countries to nations. You need a large enough tribe to be able to defend against the other tribe over the hill. Then along comes a country (collection of tribes) that’s too big to defend against. So you need to ally with other tribes to fend off the country, and so it goes until we reach empire status. Tribes worked when there were few people with lots of geographic spread.
  
  So we need an ethnic government. One with guardrails. Our goal is to figure out how to get there from where we are.
  
  Reply
  1. Lineman
    
    August 17, 2026 at 2:36 pm
    
    So we need an ethnic government. One with guardrails. Our goal is to figure out how to get there from where we are.
    
    Well Brother then the age old question comes up what came first the chicken or the egg…I’m in the camp of the chicken came first so I would say we have to have a White Homeland before we can have any sort of government figured out…Sure it’s great to have a semblance of a plan laid out but if our focus is trying to figure out the perfect system instead of getting our folk in an area that will support them now(tactically and in the long term(strategic) then we will just keep spinning our wheels like we are now and in the past…
    
    Reply
Vigilant

August 17, 2026 at 2:46 pm

“How do we establish a government that actually loves and takes care of its people?”

The government has to actually be *of its people.*
The people must be uniform, as in the same race and culture. Harmonious religions bond a people with similar values, holy days, and habits.

It goes without saying that governments must be small and local. The leaders should come from the community, the people who you have known and interacted with for years.

I don’t have any grand plan, however, I know that the people must be homogeneous, not diverse. Diversity is death.

Reply
Dan

August 17, 2026 at 7:43 pm

Anarchy like communism is a theory. One that CANNOT work in real life. Anytime you have two or more people together a hierarchy of some type develops. And this always leads to politics in some form. Since people are inherently selfish and corruptible politics invariably becomes corrupted. It’s the nature of humanity. And there may not be a “solution” to this reality.

Reply

Thought Exercise Conclusion 1 of 5

5 responses to “Thought Exercise Conclusion 1 of 5”

Leave a Reply Cancel reply