Roth Note: I will suggest that there is no perfect government system. We’ve discovered that the system the Founders bequeathed to us was not sustainable over time. That said, I’d like to propose some aspects of a system that I think could work. I’m going to offer it up in parts so that the reader can consider and comment on each. I’m especially interested in comments on problems the reader might see in each part.
Assume Nationalism means the nation is a racial community.
We are a people bound by common blood, ancestry, history, and future
destiny. This is in line with the etymology of the word “nation”, stemming from the Latin ‘natio’, meaning race, tribe, or people.
A true nation is not merely an idea that anyone can join. It is the natural expression of a racial folk who have lived, worked, and defended the same land for generations. It affirms that our people are a racial collective, and that we must have racial sovereignty over our lands, governed and led by the best of our own people.
This blood is the foundation of our identity, culture, strength, and right to exist. Everything we are stems from our blood. Loyalty to the nation begins with loyalty to our blood. We reject liberal “civic nationalism” that dissolves blood ties through mass immigration and multiculturalism and attempts to convince us that a foreigner can ever be of our kind. A nation without its blood is a house on sand, over time it degrades and crumbles. We must guard and advance our blood above all. When blood is rooted and united, the nation endures and prospers.
Our race is the living foundation of everything we are, and everything we will become, and must be protected above all.
Roth Note: Now tell me what’s wrong with this.
15 responses to “Thought Exercise Part 1”
Is this a lesson plan from the War College Professor or an actual Roth may actually learn something and Change His Mind?
If a real discussion lets lead off with a historical example of such a racially pure nation.
An AI summary from a simple search in the Freespoke search engine:
“Japan is often considered a largely monoethnic country, although its society is more diverse than commonly believed, with increasing numbers of immigrants and children of mixed parentage since the 1950s and 1980s. Iceland is also frequently cited as a country with a high degree of genetic homogeneity due to its small founding population and historical isolation, experiencing minimal immigration between the 1100s and after World War II.”
There are other examples … do your own research and answer the question: “what is wrong with this?”
Hans
Depends on how far back you look into there “racially pure”.
Vikings were quite a genetically diverse bunch. Bringing home women and children from everywhere they raided.
Same story with Japan as invasion added other genetics into the “pure Japanese “.
So how many generations do you have to go back to establish “pure blood “.
Thus I suggest that culture is as important as “purity “.
That way we can determine if Hans is pure.
Michael – I never claimed to be pure … I’m a mongrel of German, Swiss, and Scott immigrants born in the US.
All I did was demonstrate to one commenter how easy it is to answer the question asked by the author … and asked another commenter to stay on topic.
The PATCON discussions are going to devolve quickly if we cannot address ideas presented by an author / moderator and stay on topic.
Cheers, Hans
I guarantee the roundtable discussions will be kept on track and to the topic.
Do not let perfect be the enemy of good. Realistically, we will never achieve a racially “pure” country. But we can certainly remove the very worst groups that sow discord and destruction. As I see it, there are four principle groups that need biggest priority treatment. Jews, blacks, pajeets, and anyone who is a muslim, irrespective of actual race.
Others that will need attention once the heavy lifting is done are the chinese, “latinos” (quote marked, as it is a term contrived by government) and various other Asians. If we could get a true do-over, it would stand to reason (with the benefit of hindsight) that the Irish and Italians should never have been allowed in (and I say that as one who is ~50% Irish) in any significant quantity.
I’m not sure where to draw the line on Eastern Europeans/Slavs (of the non-islamic variety). Some are pretty based due to the decades they spent suffering under Soviet communism remaining somewhat fresh in their minds, but they are different enough from the baseline we are aiming for that they probably need exclusion as well.
And then there are all those actually of one White ethnicity or another who are dyed in the wool leftists, who will need to be dealt with, lest they wreck any nascent efforts the good guys make at setting up a decent society again.
That’s where I think it’s headed. Very, VERY granular. Counties will be the largest functional entities, IMO, and only those that are homogenous. The problem stems partly from large urban centers, but I’d digress.
The problem I see is our own people; both young and old have been brainwashed to the point they are in my opinion, insane.
There are some that think as we do and with them a new nation could be started.
As for the others, solutions will have to be found.
Culture is what unites or divides a people.
Brainwashing is culture, warped but culture.
How to restore those that have been anti-white liberalized is a real problem. People WANT to Believe their Group-Media generated Prejudices and facts don’t soak in.
If you want to see a great lesson how “Blood” can lose out to changing culture just look at Mao’s Red Guard with their “little Red Book” DESTROYING the Culture of China with their campaign against the 4 Olds.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Olds
Reading this is chilling as it smells just like the Capitalism has FAILED US, Up with Socialism that is sweeping the campuses and MASS MEDIA.
Especially the destroying of OLD Monuments and RENAMING streets, essentially rewriting history.
Lose your history, lose your culture. I think Orwell’s 1984 spoke a lot about this.
“There are some that think as we do … a new nation could be stared.”
Are they a genetically homogeneous population?
We should strive to stay on topic!
Hans
Selections will have to be made and those that don’t fit will have to be rejected.
Agree Brother it has to start from there and then everything else comes after…
There is nothing wrong with protecting our blood, and that doesn’t make us racist.
What’s wrong with this idea? Not a damn thing. Every race has its’ losers and never-do-wells. White people just have less of them as we don’t coddle or feel sorry for them. At least Whites who are raised right.
[…] Nationalism/Race […]