I don’t see how the case goes to trial.
Why was Israel so afraid of Charlie Kirk? Why did Trump help cover this up?
State collapse is inevitable when a society’s leaders are insulated from the negative consequences of their bad decisions.
Mike Shelby
🚨 BOMBSHELL: ATF Ballistics Expert ADMITS the Rifle Had DUST Inside the Barrel When Recovered — PROOF The Gun Had NOT Been Recently Fired 😱
— Project Constitution (@ProjectConstitu) July 14, 2026
During cross-examination, ATF firearms examiner Samantha Karner confirmed under oath that when the alleged murder rifle was recovered,… https://t.co/CrCCJDN7eJ pic.twitter.com/QrDtIwUaWw
I don’t see how the case goes to trial.
Why was Israel so afraid of Charlie Kirk? Why did Trump help cover this up?
Published by
David DeGerolamo
Previous Post
Seems I remember the rifle was found in the bushes on the ground. I submit that dust will find it’s way into a rifle barrel within minutes of being fired in conditions like that. I watched the entire Samantha Karner part of the hearing. First, I found her credibility to be questionable. I saw every one of the bullet fragment comparisons. To suggest that there was not enough to make a positive identification of the rifle fragment and the test rounds was laughable. Despite the condition, there were clearly exact matches of the rifling from both rounds.
Tyler Robinson confessed. Seven times. Both verbally and IN WRITING. There is 4K video (which we have not seen yet, but the jury will, and everyone in the pre-trial hearing saw) of him on the roof, going up the stairs, going back down the stairs, driving away, everywhere. He’s trying to starve himself in jail. He has said he wished he hadn’t done it.
This trial, if even remotely honest, is a slam dunk. He will be facing the firing squad.
Now, is it possible Israel had something to do with this? Possibly, although not directly (although we all know, in our hearts, that Israel is polluting us with propaganda disguised as “disaffected Americans”). This is the theme for RULE 11 in Rules For Radicals: “”If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside; this is based on the principle that every positive has its negative.””.
It is far more likely he was just radicalized by his tranny lover, social media, and the same assault we are all subjected to day in and day out.
The Principle of Parsimony applies.
Don’t let anybody named Jacob Rubinstein get within 100 yds of Tyler Robinson until the trial concludes……
Photo of the rifle under the bushes, receiver visible, no towel wrapped around it. Look at how the scope is mounted. You would have a bruised eye socket if you fired it. There are other anomalies that don’t seem to fit. 30-06 ballistics don’t match the wound. A video taken by a person at the event from a position front and center of the tent shows Charlie being shot, then turns left to show someone in black running along a roof top, not carrying anything in their hands, at an angle opposite the entry wound in Charlie’s neck. Early video shown on the news shows someone in black dropping from a roof, seated then turning then hanging by both hands. No rifle visible on the person or ground. So I still have questions, like, is it possible to brainwash someone into believing that they have done something they did not in fact, do?

Leave a Reply