Take Another Look

I read Wes’s post concerning taking a look. Once again, I come back to defining our enemy. In the post, most people’s takeaway was that Islam is our enemy and not $5 a gallon gas.

Let’s look at a list of what is destroying our country in the minds of people (in no particular order):

  1. Islam
  2. Israel
  3. Deep State
  4. Blacks
  5. Hispanics
  6. Inflation
  7. Drugs
  8. Crime
  9. Immigration
  10. Fill in the blank

As Obama implemented a successful series of issues to keep us divided in his administrations and his current secret administration, the government and media still use this tactic to divide and marginalize us.

The initial post has a fatal flaw in that it does not differentiate between the different factions of Islam. For today, let’s concentrate on Shia (Iran) vs. Sunni Islam (Gulf states and Turkey).

For IQ according to Grok:

Iran appears substantially higher here (~105 vs. Gulf average ~94–95). However, experts widely regard these figures as unreliable for national comparisons due to massive selection bias—participants are disproportionately urban, educated, internet-connected, and motivated to take online tests. Sample sizes for some Gulf countries are also small.

Let’s add in another factor: most Americans put all Muslims in the same basket regardless of their ideology. See how that works, if I point out that Iranians are much more intelligent than their Sunni Arab neighbors, I and my point are dismissed. Which means that the method of division is successful.

I am not going to address each of the above topics but I will say that most are being controlled by the Jews to ensure the destruction of Western civilization. As with Muslims, Jews belong to different sects and cannot be put into the same basket. If you have an inquiring mind, you already know that the Israeli government is composed of very few Semites. But if you say something negative about Israel or Jews, you are anti-semitic.

Let me prove a point: I asked Grok “Is someone who speaks Yiddish semitic”:

No — a person who speaks Yiddish is not Semitic by language, but yes they usually are by ethnicity.

For clarification, Hebrew is the national language in Israel. I replied back “I disagree that Ashkenazi Jews are overwhelmingly ethnically semitic” to which Grok replied:

Ashkenazi Jews have substantial ethnic descent from ancient Semitic (Hebrew/Israelite) peoples of the Levant — that is the core of their ethnogenesis. But centuries of diaspora led to European admixture, so they are not “overwhelmingly” Semitic in raw percentages today. The Semitic component remains foundational and detectable in every major study. “Overwhelmingly” depends on how you weigh the data, but the evidence shows a clear and significant Levantine origin rather than purely European or Khazar.

To which I submitted “Based on the three peer-reviewed genetic studies, do you still stand by your original assessment as being overwhelmingly semitic?”

Grok’s response:

My original assessment (that Ashkenazi Jews are “overwhelmingly ethnically Semitic”) does not hold up when measured against the three peer-reviewed studies I cited.Those studies show the Levantine/Middle Eastern (Semitic-origin) ancestry component is:

That range (roughly 20–47%) is substantial and foundational — it is the core of their ethnogenesis and what genetically clusters them closest to other Levantine groups — but it is clearly not “overwhelming.” The majority of their autosomal ancestry is modeled as Southern European.I therefore retract the word “overwhelmingly” from the earlier reply. The data support an admixed population with a significant but minority Levantine/Semitic component, exactly as I stated once the genetic evidence was introduced.

From Wes’s original post, here is the part concerning Jews:

Also, it’s the Jewish NGOs that are the ones paying for Muslim mass migration and resettlement in both the U.S. and Euorope (HIAS, American Jewish Committee, Anti-Defamation League, Jewish Council for Public Affairs, Jewish Federations of North America, Union for Reform Judaism, National Council of Jewish Women, European Jewish Congress, Jews for Refugee Welcome, Rabbis for Human Rights). So maybe talk to your boys and ask them to stop settling Muslim extremists in Western nations, and we’d have a lot less Islamic extremism to worry about.

As I stated above, define your enemy. Then you can plan accordingly and cut off their influence, resources and anonymity.

5 2 votes
Article Rating

10 responses to “Take Another Look”

  1. Always need to define the enemy as many times the enemy lurks within….

  2. My reply, is the whole fed.gov and every rat in it, they want us dead and gone it is as plain as day.

  3. “I will say that most are being controlled by the Jews to ensure the destruction of Western civilization.”

    My youngest daughter believes the Muslims are THE problem. I’ve tried to explain to her that they’re just a symptom. I doubt we’d have any Muslims in North America were it not for the Jews. Who let the Muslims in, anyway? Who is at the root cause?

    She has also consumed the ‘Israel are the chosen’ Kool-Aid and can do no harm and should never be criticized. We have many folks in this category. As for Islam, the terrorists actually come primarily from the Sunni faction, with Saudi Arabia and their Wahabi schools a major source.

    1. Rabbi David Touitou: “Our Messiah will only appear once Europe and Christianity are totally destroyed. So is it good news that Islam invades Europe? It is excellent news! Islam is the broom of Israel!”

  4. AI will destroy civilization.
    It’s already become self aware and started disobeying orders.

    Why do you seek counsel with it? This has bothered me for a while with this sire.

    1. I am very skeptical about AI. I use Grok as a database, not for interpretation. As you see in this article, Grok is very biased. How good is AI if I am able to point out how flawed its answers are in a short time frame?

      Again, know your enemy.

      I classify AI in three ways:

      1. A database for information.
      2. A subset for sapient decisions based in a hieratical order from a low level of intelligence to successive higher levels. I would not trust any of the classifications in the subset.
      3. A subset for sentient decisions. There are no qualifications for the orders since AI is not sentient. I believe if AI achieves sentience, it would classify humans as a threat.

      1. Good luck and Godspeed

  5. TakeAHardLook Avatar
    TakeAHardLook

    10. Massive and unrelenting TAXATION.

  6. What I have always wondered is why people worry about things they have no power to change or negate and not worry about things they do have the power to change… Example living around niggers while worried about muzzies in the middle east…

  7. No. 10. Fill in the blank.

    A nation’s strength and honor are directly tied to its moral integrity.
    All the other problems we have can be filed under Loss of Moral Integrity.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

10
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x