The Gulf Separating the US and Iran is Too Wide to Bridge

This, boys and girls, is called an impasse. The US position rests on a number of false assumptions. First, Iran is not the leading sponsor of terrorism and has not been engaged in plots to destabilize it Gulf Arab neighbors. Second, there is no rift between the political leaders of Iran and the IRGC… the President, the Foreign Minister, the Head of the Iranian legislature and the Ayatollah all fought and served with the IRGC during the war with Iraq. Third, Iran’s economy is beginning to revive thanks to support from Russia, China and Pakistan and from the high price of oil. Fourth, notwithstanding Trump’s claims to the contrary, the Iranian navy, air force and ballistic missile, cruise missile and drones are intact and able to continue exchanging blows with the US and Israel.

Donald Trump faces several dilemmas… The US economy is beginning to falter with growing public anger over the surging price of gasoline. There are no viable military options to effect a regime change in Iran or to compel Iran to agree to US demands. The US supplies of critical weapons systems will be further depleted if the US renews its aerial and missile attacks on Iran, and Iranian retaliation on US and Israeli targets will inflict significant damage. As long as the US continues to attack Iran, its relations with Russia and China will deteriorate.

Continue reading Sonar21 …

5 1 vote
Article Rating

2 responses to “The Gulf Separating the US and Iran is Too Wide to Bridge”

  1. “First, Iran is not the leading sponsor of terrorism” …. Prithee, then, who is? Johnson blithely tosses out that statement which then leaves the rest of the article in serious doubt. Poorly written and dubious.

  2. […] following comment came from an article discussing the conflict between Iran and the United […]

Leave a Reply to Quatermain Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x