Simplicius notes the truth of the actual damage done to US bases early in the war. Things pundits like Mcgregor, Johnson, Crooke, and company were accurately reporting, but Fox News rejected.
Putting two and two together we can now reconstruct the events more accurately: Iranian aircraft appeared to have breached US defenses, directly gravity-bombed US bases, all while causing flustered defenders to engage in friendly fire. That means Iran was able to do to the US what even Ukraine has not been able to do to Russia, despite Ukraine having a more modern NATO-supplied airforce.
… and …
Rubio makes what might be the worst and stupidest logical equivalencies imaginable. First, he says Iran’s hostage-taking of the Strait of Hormuz is akin to a “nuclear weapon”, then outdoes his own imbecility by concluding that Iran’s Hormuz actions mean that if Iran were to have nuclear weapons, it would use them against the world:
By that logic, since the lowest cumulative IQ US administration in history has also chosen to blockade Hormuz, and since the US does already possess nuclear weapons and has even used them against peaceful civilians in the past, we should therefore make the natural ‘ergo’ assumption.
In fact, what Rubio and the rest of his juvenile administration are doing is grasping at straws to make any even remotely frail argument that could be sold to the American gorms as some kind of justification for the Israel-servitude we are witnessing. It’s as specious and hollow as Trump claiming the Iran war was necessary now—of all times—because “Iran had been threatening America for 47 years”.
It’s simply embarrassing.
Continue reading Simplicius’ latest report …
Leave a Reply to DWEEZIL THE WEASEL Cancel reply