4 responses to “Why We Should Be Worried About AI”

1. 

   Phil1350

   April 25, 2026 at 12:54 pm

   The entire A.I. beast system is wicked and evil and all run in favor for the demon-rat party and the perverted wicked deeds they do every day.
   The system was created by satan and his minions so that he could become some kind of all-knowing little god who can see everything men /women are doing using the AI system, Only God is Omnipresent and satan is trying to mimic God by using his beast system. but I have news for him it won’t work because God is going to destroy him and his minions and all of them will be cast into the pit for all eternity.

   Reply
2. 

   highmaintenancelowtolerance

   April 25, 2026 at 1:09 pm

   This is why I won’t value any article that claims its information was sourced by Grok et al. That includes articles submitted through Appalachian Renegade. It’s still a little early but I’m guessing that soon there won’t be anything worth reading that hasn’t been corrupted by AI as explained in this article. The really frightening aspect is that all public education institutions are brainwashing our children from pre-school on to see the internet as the absolute source for truth.

   Reply
   1. 

      Hammers Thor

      April 25, 2026 at 3:01 pm

      This is not an unreasonable position, although it was not the main point of posting this article. Most of the information that can be learned from Grok (for example) IS reliable, but it is important to question any data that do not either support what you already know, or at least meets the standard that you would deem reasonable. AI can solve a lot of problems much faster than we can, and it can disseminate data from a multitude of sources that we cannot possibly access in an efficient amount of time. I personally use Grok and several offline models nearly every day, from helping to understand and design amateur radio antennas, build digital radio hotspots, find healthy and natural alternatives to pharmaceutical treatments, and to analyze scientific and historical data (another hobby of mine).

      These last are where the question marks really surface, as it becomes obvious that much of the information the models draw on are from the same leftist government sources that have poisoned our ability to learn the truth for many years now. It is nearly impossible to find any AI models that don’t conform to government dogma regarding climate change, historical events, scientific discoveries and the current political climate.

      One of the main issues is that for every truthful scientific article out there (for example, the fact that dark matter is a completely imaginary construct and has never been proven, yet every model treats it as settled science, just like man-made climate change) there are hundreds of articles that regurgitate government propaganda. This is what skews the results, and makes the AI models no better than typical google searches, only faster.

      The point of the essay is that these AI systems can be corrupted from the literal building blocks of the model, which can poison them right out of the gate. If you’re just searching for information, this is a nuisance, but not necessarily dangerous. The real issue comes from the implementation of AI in industry, sales, scientific research and much more.

      Reply
3. 

   GWG

   April 25, 2026 at 2:09 pm

   Via the interwebs… (did not read the entire essay)

   Scholar Summarization Datasets (ACLSum)

   ACLSum is a domain-specific dataset for aspect-based summarization that contains exactly 250 documents.

   Scholar summarization datasets are specialized collections of academic papers, articles, and their corresponding summaries, designed to train and evaluate AI models in generating concise, accurate summaries of complex scientific literature. These datasets typically focus on long-document comprehension, covering disciplines like medicine and computer science.

   – belligerent intelligence by our self-anointed overlords

   Reply