h/t WRSA
5
1
vote
Article Rating
Ivermectin Dosages
Free PDF Download of The Great Taking
The New Declaration of Independence
AppalachianRenegade YouTube Channel
Free PDF Download of The Great Taking
The New Declaration of Independence
AppalachianRenegade YouTube Channel
State collapse is inevitable when a society’s leaders are insulated from the negative consequences of their bad decisions.
Mike Shelby
h/t WRSA
14 responses to “Enemies & Solutions”
-
I don’t know ALL the ins and outs of Hinduism, but I have never seen it applied as a system of governance, and any issues with the abuse of government power should be addressed by ELIMINATING GOVERNMENT POWER. It is a 5000+ year old religion that has influenced countless religions that followed. Their religion most certainly does NOT deny the divinely-realized nature of Jesus, but they do not see him as the ONLY divinely-realized being to bless humanity with their presence and their teachings over the millennia. Additionally, there are thousands of different sects of the religion all of which are different in their own ways (if some in particular support certain behaviors over others).
I certainly get the issues with Islam as their beliefs seem to be more about structuring society, and include the legal violations of person and property and disrespect for the obvious difference between children and adults with regards to consent.
I certainly understand the issues with the H1B visa programs, all the abuse of freebies by immigrants from India, and their lack of desire to integrate into our society. Those things need to end to preserve our economy and the nature of America (but that is in regards to ALL immigrants).
No issues with the rest of the list.
-
Yep. Not sure how anyone could argue with this.
-
I’ll bite. There is an old saying: “Show me who you are with, and I will tell you who you are.” In that fetid septic tank of India, Christians are openly persecuted by this “5000+ year” “religion” which is steeped in idolatry, animal worship, and used to mandate the widows throw themselves on their husband’s funeral pyres. The Brits took exception to that “religious practice” and stopped it.
I admit I am a bigot and a racist. When I worked the Welfare Fraud and White-Collar crime detail as a Peace Officer in SoCal, I ran into my share of Prajeet grifters. To be fair, the tax termite grifter class also included the “Asian Refugees”, Blacks, Latinos, and even Romanians(!). But the Prajeet group were wily enough to game the Medi-Cal system for millions, using staged auto accidents and crooked chiropractors. And the ones I arrested stank so bad of curry I would have to roll down the car windows just to survive the drive to county jail. All immigration with the exception of White South Africans needs to be stopped immediately. Amerika ist verloren.
-
-
Extremism.
-
“The term “extremism” defines exactly nothing. It is a term used to connote an issue no one dare denote. It is a term used by devotees of the cult of moral greyness to ‘define’ that which they fear the most–principled adherence to truth, morality, and ethics……”.
“Funk and Wagnalls New Practical Standard Dictionary (1947) defines the word extreme thus: “Ex-treme adj. 1. Being of the highest degree, at best, worst, greatest, etc….” Extreme, then, is a measure of degree. When the word “extreme” is used by political and media smear artists, it is intended to mean an extreme of any degree regardless of its nature. This implication is inherently evil. It means that extreme morality and immorality are equally undesirable; extreme honesty and dishonesty are equally immoral, and extreme virtue and extreme depravity are equally evil.”
On Extremism
by J.F.A. Davidson
THE RESISTER, Volume II, Number 1 1995
https://newresister.blogspot.com/2008/11/on-extremism.html-
Relax Mike. Let’s agree on using the words Tolerate, Love, and Peace.
-
-
Good job, Mike. Words do, indeed, mean things. We’ve let too many of them be hijacked.
-
Have you ever used the word Extremism, Roth? I agree with you about words. How do you feel about the word tolerate. It’s vital humans learn how to tolerate what is uncomfortable.
-
Yes, “Extremism in pursuit of liberty is no vice.” I’m an extremist in the protection of my family and Folk and in pursuit of virtue, truth, and honor.
One gets more of what one tolerates. Evil is ‘uncomfortable’ and I will not tolerate it. People’s opinions can sometimes be ‘uncomfortable’ for me, but I tolerate them. Does that answer your question?
-
Damn straight. “Tolerance” has been redefined and hijacked to guilt us into sacrificing our country and our culture for the benefit of those who do not tolerate US. They come here (many illegally) and partake of both legitimate economic opportunity that should be reserved for ourselves, as well as exploiting any and all of the many socialist support systems that have been established. Not to mention the outright criminal fraud.
All to the detriment of the rightful posterity of the OUR nation, not theirs. They do not cooperate, assimilate or contribute much of anything useful. They are parasitic draws on our resources, and just as a plague of locusts, will consume everything we have and leave both us, and ultimately themselves, with nothing.
Further, they have no reason or right to be here. They have their own countries. It isn’t my fault – or my problem – that their home countries suck. They need to fix that themselves, but they generally can’t due to lacking the intellectual capacity to create an environment better than what they already have there. And by coming here, they make only ours immeasurably worse.
The fact is that all these invaders are here only because they either walked in over a land border directly, or were effectively “invited in” on the sneak, with much assistance by opportunistic political whores (including so called “religious” charities that are anything but) sucking up government money to directly facilitate our dispossession with an onslaught.
All the people who want to cite religious reasons (charity, etc.) for allowing this state of affairs need to go back and read about the tower of babel. Oh, but if a scriptural passage is inconvenient to one’s beliefs, then it is simply ignored as if it never existed to begin with. How interesting. It is also taught that God created the tribes and nations of the earth.
(Some) humans have arrogantly decided to corrupt The Creator’s efforts by mixing them all together, until there is no discernable distinction amongst them. If that’s what was intended, it would been created that way by his hand. What we need is the re-establishment of our unique national identity and culture, and the exclusion of all who are incompatible with that ideal. That is the very definition and purpose of a “nation”.
Again, they already have places where they belong amongst their own; they’re not entitled to ours as well. I’m disgusted with the ongoing perversion of religion to justify the ruination of entire groups of people by stealing their birthright and giving it to outsiders.
-
-
-
-
-
Big Ruckus, I enjoyed reading your perspective. I feel differently than you in certain aspects but thank you for sharing. What is your favorite ethnicity?
-
My favorite ethnicity? My own, of course, White, western European (mostly Germanic) descended from generations of people who preceded me here. Further, my ethnciity should be allowed it’s own homeland free of the interference and predation of foreigners whose values and motivations are at odds with mine. Note the US was founded and organized primarily by The English, some Germans, and some Dutch. Their descendents are the proverbial “posterity” referred to in the constitution.
No one disputes that Japan is for the Japanese, China is for the Chinese (Han, principally), etc. One of the biggest reasons I take jews to task so often is that they have reserved for themselves Israel as an explicit ethnostate, when so many of them (as dual citizens, no less) come here and agitate politically for wide open borders and no restriction on the invasion of third world people who cannot and will never be Americans in anything other than name, granted by a piece of paper printed by the same crooked government that is funding and facilitating all the invasion (it is NOT migration, and it most assuredly isn’t “amnesty”) with the explicit intent of using resettlement of wool these people against me. That would be genocide, by the way. You asked my favorite ethnicity. Well, ask a jew, a mexican, or a black person what theirs is. Their respective answers will be self evident, and no one will be surprised by – or take issue + with their given answers. I expect my answer will be similarly accepted and respected. But all too often, it isn’t. And I will beat on that dead horse for as long as I have to.
The 1965 immigration act that kicked off the overrunning of America with foreign hordes was written by none other than Emmanuel Cellar, an ethnic jew, who got the drunken bastard Ted Kennedy to carry his water (maybe it came out of Poucha Pond on Chappaquiddick) in sponsoring and getting the bill passed.
What would be the reaction if I, an American of primarily German extraction, went to Israel and told them “you have to embrace diversity, by allowing your country to be overrun by foreigners who have nothing in common with you. And, your native citizens will have to pay for their dispossession entirely out of their own pockets?” Well, for openers, I would be viciously smeared as an anti-semite just for the mere suggestion. Then I’d be told in no uncertain terms to get the hell out and mind my own business in my own country (if Mossad didn’t just put a hit on me).
Take note that anytime Israel feels the least bit threatened, they reserve the right to launch missiles and other military attacks against any and all neighboring countries around them. We sort of have a little issue with that over there right now, as it happens. Well, if it’s good enough for them, then I should be similarly able to repel invaders of my country with identical measures, and be beyond any reproach for doing so, just as Israel expects to be. And the fact that those running things will simply refuse to call (or acknowledge it) as invasion changes nothing. Again, words have meaning. They can call it anything, I recognize it for what it is.
Do you start to see the issue by the revelation of all this blatant hypocrisy, and the actions of those behind the subversion of America? And by that last sentence, note that I’m not ascribing sole blame to jews. Catholic and Lutheran charities have been at the forefront of the effort at bringing in scores of invaders, and they’ve been doing it with government funds. Plenty of White Americans are stupidly and destructively liberal in their permissiveness and encouragement (we might even call it “tolerance”, eh?) for the ruination of their country by foreign invasion.
And again, all of these foreign people, irrespective of where they come from originally, do have a native country into which they were born. That’s where they should be, and they should be expending any efforts at improving their lot in life in their native lands for the benefit of themselves, and everyone else there. We can make our own way here, and do not need or want their influence. Excluding the incompatible is a very simple and sensible concept, but far too many argue against it under a rubric of false virtue.
-
Guten Tag mein Bruder. My ancestor arrived in 1709 from Leipzig. I’ve never heard what you wrote put better. Kudos to you! The alternative is what we’re getting – globo-homo (global homogeneity). No diverse cultures, no nations, and a mixed race blob. Thanks, but no thanks. Folkishness is the way.
-
-
-
Big Ruckus, heartfelt thanks for your time and consideration for explaining your stance. I do not support illegal immigration. I am Lithuanian. I am not up to date on immigration quotas. I need to do some research on this. I also do not favor that old saying, “ Pull yourself up by your bootstraps.” There are lots of reasons some us of cannot do that sometimes for valid reasons. We cannot “sift out” of people their ancestral bloodlines. That is a fact. So we must accept a lot of things we do not want to accept sometimes. It’s been 250 years since the Europeans tip toed onto this land. We cannot go back. Where we are standing is the reality of where we are; however unpleasant we may find it. On a scale of 1-10 I like the number 5. Not all right and not all left. I feel healthier when I am flexible sometimes and sometimes not so flexible. I respect your view, though.
Leave a Reply to Roth Harbard Cancel reply