Latest from Simplicius

The bottom line of the war is this: The US has nothing left to hit because Iran has gone “dark” and salted away its premiere systems, bunkered down its leadership, and only launches missiles from underground cities the US and Israel can’t penetrate because they’re deep inside Iran and would require establishing the “air superiority” that supposedly existed since day one.

In reality, it’s likely Trump himself does not know what he plans to do and is merely operating on a daily whim based on how much his “highlight reel” briefings have jacked up his endorphins that particular morning. The ‘strategic ambiguity’ card is a given for the sake of buying time, but it’s clear now that Iran is not being degraded at all and is actually only growing stronger given that socio-political consolidation has ramped up throughout the country owing to the failure of the West’s various psychological schemes.

Personally, I lean towards Ken Klippenstein’s earlier thesis that the supposedly-ongoing concentration of US ground troops is meant more as a psychological threat factor to leverage Iran into negotiations. But that doesn’t mean that should this leverage option fail, Trump won’t legitimately consider deploying the troops in some way, shape, or form—though no one yet can come up with an even semi-plausible scenario for how exactly such an operation could unfold.

Continue reading …

0 0 votes
Article Rating

3 responses to “Latest from Simplicius”

  1. All of the economies in the middle east are suffering. Israel has very few people. Many of them are in the military. Israel just called up 450,000 reservists. That leaves few workers in Israel. Their refineries have been blown up. Lots of infrastructure damage too. Soon they will have to make a decision. Peace or Nukes. I think they’ll go with the Nukes. First, expect a large false flag here.

    1. Sounds logical.

  2. I agree with the statement.

    “ Personally, I lean towards Ken Klippenstein’s earlier thesis that the supposedly-ongoing concentration of US ground troops is meant more as a psychological threat factor to leverage Iran into negotiations. But that doesn’t mean that should this leverage option fail, Trump won’t legitimately consider deploying the troops in some way, shape, or form—though no one yet can come up with an even semi-plausible scenario for how exactly such an operation could unfold.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

3
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x