Bret Weinstein on Ivermectin and the accidental experiment no one wants to talk about:
— Defiant Ghost (@TheDefiantGhost) March 16, 2026
"80 cases. In 40 of those cases, the courts granted the family's request and Ivermectin was administered. In forty cases, they refused to intervene and no Ivermectin was given. In 38 of the… pic.twitter.com/90wScyfm9n
0
0
votes
Article Rating
3 responses to “The EUL Would Have Been Revoked”
Those who do NOT understand the EUA process, requirements, etc. simply do NOT appreciate what was at stake. Not that the government actually EVER follows its own rules, but an EUA CANNOT be given to a drug that has NOT undergone extensive safety testing, etc. UNLESS THERE IS NO OTHER ALTERNATIVE THERAPY AVAILABLE. Were Ivermectin, Hydroxychlorquine (with/without zinc additions) shown to be effective, the FDA would NOT have “legally” been allowed to approve the mRNA jab that killed millions and continues to kill millions more. The TRILLIONS in profits would have been reduced to ZERO, and millions would have gotten better without the year-long psychological terrorism campaign that ALSO justified millions of easily corrupted mail-in ballots and everyone shutting down businesses and staying indoors. This was WAY BIGGER than most have bothered to educate themselves about. CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY is truly the ONLY way to term it…and PROSECUTE IT!!!!
Winner winner chicken dinner. Everyone, EVERYONE even remotely associated with the EUA needs to be HANGED!!!
It worked, they knew it worked, they absolutely demonized it for the sole purpose of forcing that damned shot on everyone.
Crimes against humanity level fraud. They need to hang, or this nation will not recover (like those damned files – it will be the source of this nations downfall)
Something else I learned. Any medication, vaccine, treatment under EUA is considered to be experimental. Elements of the Nuremberg Code were written into Federal law, IIRC in CFR50, it is a 20 year felony plus fine for any person (includes corporate “persons”) to coerce an individual into taking part in a medical experiment. Therefore any corporation that forced employees to get the jab in order to keep their job, the officers of that corporation who allowed such policy are guilty of a felony. I’d like to see one of these big national law firms push a class action against any business that forced the jab on their employees. For employees that were fired, it is not a legitimate reason to discharge an employee because they would not the company commit a felony against them. A smart attorney could probably find a way to bring in big pharma as a defendant.