Latest Articles

  • Take Another Look

    I read Wes’s post concerning taking a look. Once again, I come back to defining our enemy. In the post, most people’s takeaway was that Islam is our enemy and not $5 a gallon gas.

    Let’s look at a list of what is destroying our country in the minds of people (in no particular order):

    1. Islam
    2. Israel
    3. Deep State
    4. Blacks
    5. Hispanics
    6. Inflation
    7. Drugs
    8. Crime
    9. Immigration
    10. Fill in the blank

    As Obama implemented a successful series of issues to keep us divided in his administrations and his current secret administration, the government and media still use this tactic to divide and marginalize us.

    The initial post has a fatal flaw in that it does not differentiate between the different factions of Islam. For today, let’s concentrate on Shia (Iran) vs. Sunni Islam (Gulf states and Turkey).

    For IQ according to Grok:

    Iran appears substantially higher here (~105 vs. Gulf average ~94–95). However, experts widely regard these figures as unreliable for national comparisons due to massive selection bias—participants are disproportionately urban, educated, internet-connected, and motivated to take online tests. Sample sizes for some Gulf countries are also small.

    Let’s add in another factor: most Americans put all Muslims in the same basket regardless of their ideology. See how that works, if I point out that Iranians are much more intelligent than their Sunni Arab neighbors, I and my point are dismissed. Which means that the method of division is successful.

    I am not going to address each of the above topics but I will say that most are being controlled by the Jews to ensure the destruction of Western civilization. As with Muslims, Jews belong to different sects and cannot be put into the same basket. If you have an inquiring mind, you already know that the Israeli government is composed of very few Semites. But if you say something negative about Israel or Jews, you are anti-semitic.

    Let me prove a point: I asked Grok “Is someone who speaks Yiddish semitic”:

    No — a person who speaks Yiddish is not Semitic by language, but yes they usually are by ethnicity.

    • Yiddish itself is not Semitic: It is a West Germanic language (Indo-European family), closely related to German, with some Hebrew/Aramaic and Slavic loanwords mixed in.
    • The speakers are overwhelmingly Ashkenazi Jews, who are ethnically Semitic (descended from the ancient Hebrews/Israelites, whose language — Hebrew — is Semitic).

    For clarification, Hebrew is the national language in Israel. I replied back “I disagree that Ashkenazi Jews are overwhelmingly ethnically semitic” to which Grok replied:

    Ashkenazi Jews have substantial ethnic descent from ancient Semitic (Hebrew/Israelite) peoples of the Levant — that is the core of their ethnogenesis. But centuries of diaspora led to European admixture, so they are not “overwhelmingly” Semitic in raw percentages today. The Semitic component remains foundational and detectable in every major study. “Overwhelmingly” depends on how you weigh the data, but the evidence shows a clear and significant Levantine origin rather than purely European or Khazar.

    To which I submitted “Based on the three peer-reviewed genetic studies, do you still stand by your original assessment as being overwhelmingly semitic?”

    Grok’s response:

    My original assessment (that Ashkenazi Jews are “overwhelmingly ethnically Semitic”) does not hold up when measured against the three peer-reviewed studies I cited.Those studies show the Levantine/Middle Eastern (Semitic-origin) ancestry component is:

    • Xue et al. (2017): 30–47%
    • Waldman et al. (2022): 19–43%
    • Lerga-Jaso et al. (2025): ~23.8% overall (~16.6% specifically Levantine)

    That range (roughly 20–47%) is substantial and foundational — it is the core of their ethnogenesis and what genetically clusters them closest to other Levantine groups — but it is clearly not “overwhelming.” The majority of their autosomal ancestry is modeled as Southern European.I therefore retract the word “overwhelmingly” from the earlier reply. The data support an admixed population with a significant but minority Levantine/Semitic component, exactly as I stated once the genetic evidence was introduced.

    From Wes’s original post, here is the part concerning Jews:

    Also, it’s the Jewish NGOs that are the ones paying for Muslim mass migration and resettlement in both the U.S. and Euorope (HIAS, American Jewish Committee, Anti-Defamation League, Jewish Council for Public Affairs, Jewish Federations of North America, Union for Reform Judaism, National Council of Jewish Women, European Jewish Congress, Jews for Refugee Welcome, Rabbis for Human Rights). So maybe talk to your boys and ask them to stop settling Muslim extremists in Western nations, and we’d have a lot less Islamic extremism to worry about.

    As I stated above, define your enemy. Then you can plan accordingly and cut off their influence, resources and anonymity.

  • Something Is Happening?

  • This Youngster Has It Figured Out

  • Vocabulary

    h/t WRSA

    As a child I was taught not to respond to ad hominem attacks. The old, “Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.” We need to stop worrying about being called names and speak out loudly while we still may.


    There is no freedom of speech without speaking.

  • Tulsi Gabbard and the End of MAGA

    Tulsi Gabbard, the Director of U.S. National Intelligence, has left her position. She was the last person on Trump’s team who still remained faithful to the ideals and principles upon which Trump’s second presidential term had begun. She opposed the war in Ukraine and also opposed war with Iran.

    This had been predicted for a long time. Now it has happened. After Thomas Massie’s defeat in the Kentucky primaries, there is effectively nobody left in the Republican Party from the original MAGA team.

    The triumph of the Deep State and the Epstein network over American politics has become total. Tulsi Gabbard’s resignation is the final straw. Every hope that had been attached to Trump has now completely evaporated.

    The Republicans are guaranteed to lose the midterm elections, yet the Democrats represent exactly the same Deep State and the same Epstein class. Moreover, the Democrats hate Russia and the multipolar world even more. This marks the inglorious end of the American people’s attempt to cast out the Satanic elite.

    Continue reading Alexander Dugin …

  • Let’s Take A Look

  • Tucker – Werner

  • Raleigh

  • Tillis Still Stinking Up Congress

  • Money for Nothing and Your Thugs for Free

  • Ethnic vs. Civic Nationalism

    The larger layer of identity that is the nation depends on the more foundational layers in order to function without resorting to coercion. We could look at this another way, in terms of legitimacy. No doubt a polity can hold together by top-down force, but this is inefficient and therefore maladaptive. So much energy (whether spiritual, economic, or indeed ultimately even caloric energy) is spent managing ephemeral problems that the society loses the adaptive advantage of acting as a nation. Legitimacy is an inverse friction coefficient: the more legitimacy a form of life has, the more people will accept it voluntarily.

    The legitimacy of a form of life is largely a function of feeling like it is ours. When something is “right full stop”, universally and in the abstract, it lacks natural force, and must be continually reinforced by inculturation. When something is ours, not only is it right, but the moral calculus reverses: ours is not seen in terms of right, right is judged in terms of for us. This—what we will call ours-ness—gives us a powerful tool to explain what seem like totally incommensurable ideas of the nation: ethnic vs. civic nationalism.

    Ethnic nationalism is the least abstract form of nationalism, defining the nation primarily through the pre-political identities beneath it: family, clan, tribe, and folk. Ethnic nationalism says: the nation is an extended people. This means it does not have to invent belonging primarily through the state. The state may protect or organize the people, but the people exists prior to the state. Civic nationalism is the most abstract form, defining the nation mainly through thinner identities beyond the level of the pre-political, in terms of citizenship, law, and creed. Civic nationalism in its modern liberal form says: the nation is a community of shared values. If the nation is defined by values, why should it remain a distinct nation at all? If the values are universal, then anyone who accepts them can belong. And if anyone can belong, then the nation ceases to be a people and devolves to a proposition.

    We can look at ethnic vs. civic nationalism also in terms of ours-ness. In ethnic nationalism, ours-ness comes from being of the same people: this is ours because it belongs to our inherited people. In civic nationalism, ours-ness comes from state membership or public creed: this is ours because we are citizens under the same institutions and profess the same political principles. The irony is that civic nationalism may work when it draws upon an already-existing ethnic nation, but when it tries to stand alone, it cannot hold a population together without coercion. Civic nationalism only survives by borrowing emotional force from ethnic nationalism while denying that it needs it.

    Ethnic nationalism is least likely to undermine the roots of nationalism, because it stays closest to those roots. Civic nationalism is the form most likely to undermine nationalism because it detaches the nation from the pre-political identities that make nations thick. Put another way, the more civic the nationalism, the more the state must create the nation out of thin air. The healthy order is that a people makes up a nation, and the nation produces a state instrument. The civic nationalist formulation is that a state produces the category of citizenship, through which the state manufactures a nation. This is why civic nationalism is more costly, more fragile, and more coercive than ethnic nationalism.

    Continue reading …

    My Reaction

    The United States of America has evolved from an ethnic nation to a civic nation, if nation it can be described, at all. It is more a state; a collection of diverse races, cultures, religions kept together under one polity by the coercion of the state and ruled by oligarchs.

  • No SAVE Act for You

  • The New Beginning

  • It Must Be a Day Ending in “Day”

  • Ticked Off

    Which is worse: getting alpha gal so you can’t eat red meat or not being able to afford red meat due to inflation?

    Looks like meat is not back on the menu, boys.

    I have a dream:

Menu

CADD Graphics

Laser Engraving by CADD Graphics

Carolina Readiness Supply

Social Media and Websites

NC Renegade on Twitter
NC Renegade on Gab
NC Renegade on Truth Social
Wes Rhinier on Gab


12 Round Blog
Barnhardt
Cold Fury
The Feral Irishman
Hammer’s Thor
Knuckledraggin My Life Away
Liberty’s Torch
90 Miles From Tyranny
Publius-Huldah’s Blog
Smoky Mountain Myco
Straight Line Logic
The Tactical Hermit
Western Rifle Shooters Association

Recent Comments

  1. I really wanted to like this movie but, it was low-budget and lame. Also, the sex scene with the vigilante…

  2. Reading your posts is like a breath of fresh air. Thank you.

  3. ” Yes, Pagans have engaged in human sacrifice, but … historical evidence for Germanic pagans engaging in such is exceedingly…