Three Paths

Trump’s team is weighing three paths on Iran: escalate militarily, tighten economic pressure, or declare victory and pull out — according to The New York Times, citing sources.

The NYT writes that Trump has effectively trapped himself in a war he can’t exit, “despite wielding the world’s biggest hammer.” A president who believed his power had no limits has run into several — and it’s left him rattled and increasingly erratic, the paper says. His presidency, per the report, has been slowly consumed by a war with no clean off-ramp.

As evidence of this erratic pattern, the NYT points to last week’s episode with Saudi Arabia: Trump’s own Energy Secretary signed a landmark civil nuclear deal with Riyadh — then less than 24 hours later, Trump blew it up himself, blindsiding the Saudis by declaring the 18-months-in-the-making agreement dead unless the kingdom joins the Abraham Accords and recognizes Israel.

Aaron David Miller, a former US diplomat with decades of Middle East experience, said Trump has once again “alienated the Saudis, delighted Netanyahu, and handed Iran a solid argument for why making deals with the US is pointless — since betrayal is inevitable.”

From DD Geopolitics

0 0 votes
Article Rating

2 responses to “Three Paths”

  1. I wish someone could explain to me why Iran having nuke material is bad and the Saudi’s, who push the Wahhabi fundamentalism insanity and its multiple terrorist groups and who supported the 9/11 attack, can have Nuke material capabilities?

    As to the 3 paths, there is currently only 1 allowed. The old Trump would declare victory and ride away but the new one under his Chosen Ones masters thumb will double down because someone else was going to do it so I had to?????

    Some will say all this cost and death is a distraction op from Epstein. All this to distract from and protect his buddies child sex charges, I don’t buy that part anymore just like the plan to fight the city of London bullshit from certain people on podcasts.

    There is an evil here way more deep from multiple groups it appears and having multiple groups competing or even jointly following the generally same path of destruction is beyond comprehension..

    1. I wish someone could explain to me why Iran having nuke material is bad and the Saudi’s, who push the Wahhabi fundamentalism insanity and its multiple terrorist groups and who supported the 9/11 attack, can have Nuke material capabilities?

      You knew the answer to that question before you even asked it…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x