State collapse is inevitable when a society’s leaders are insulated from the negative consequences of their bad decisions.
Mike Shelby
He is correct, they did murder him and got him out of the way.
Now that he has said it, he needs to have the best security money can buy. He needs to move his family to an undisclosed location.
And on top of Charlie’s ‘evolving views’ on Isra-hell… what they feared most was his future political aspirations–which if he decided to, could run for President, Senator or Governor and instantly get elected. He would have been a shoe-in–a certainty and thus a massive threat to Israel’s status quo. Charlie had the ear and attention of countless millions of people and his opinion alone could have wrecked Isra-hell’s global strategy.
He was certainly poised to become a serious inconvenience for Israel, since he seemed to be breaking with the neocon ideology in the months leading up to his death, and was beginning to engage in open criticism of Israel.
I didn’t even follow the guy closely, and I was aware of that change in tone on his part. Being a guy with enormous reach and influence amongst mainstream conservatives, I can’t imagine Israeli leadership was happy with that development. Given what has transpired since with Iran, I could figure Israel was already in the planning stages of that SNAFU, and didn’t want a guy like Charlie Kirk undercutting their support from Americans. Not that his death has prevented massive erosion of American support for israel, in any case. Knowing israel, that may well have been “justification” for taking him out.
Leave a Reply