Localization vs. Globalism
European positions in Ukraine mirror the North’s attrition strategy against the Confederacy in the American Civil War: victory came only through the near-limitless expenditure of economic and “human” capital against the South. The South outperformed them in individual battles, but had limited people to sacrifice compared to the North’s willingness to bring in mercenaries and slaves. Globalists view people as mere human capital and care little about meaningful sacrifice. This mentality dominates Europe’s ruling classes. Their readiness to import Africans as replacement “human capital” for Ukrainians reveals that they seek to “win” in an economic zone at the cost of its people — this is the epitome of a state detached from and consuming its own constituency. This underlies all politicians’ calls to continue or accelerate the conflict.
The expanded Third and developing world serve as human capital to the globalist apparatus, which drains the life force of Whites to sustain its unnatural supply chains and migrations. This is parasitical by nature. The notion that we must uplift, improve conditions for, or bear responsibility toward the Third World is harmful, and how the system expanded globally in the first place. We are responsible for destroying the bureaucratic apparatus of globalism, not for adopting its worldview and burdens.
Leave a Reply