State collapse is inevitable when a society’s leaders are insulated from the negative consequences of their bad decisions.
Mike Shelby
“People should know when they are conquered.”
— Quintus (“Gladiator” 2000)
I wouldn’t vote in any of those filthy satanic temples of Satan, and any local leader who would suggest this should be tarred and feathered never to be heard from again.
When I lived in California (pre 1997), we voted in a neighbor’s living room or garage. As a kid, I remember walking with my parents around the corner, saying high to the neighbors, and watching them sign their name in the big book and then voting. The polling place was so small that everyone knew everyone, and we could walk to it. I think that was a requirement at the time. Even as adults it was the same. When we moved to vastly corrupt Georgia, we had to drive long distances, have voted in city hall, churches (not a fan of that either), and our current location, a library. They make sure that nobody local works a local polling place (so THEY can control the rigging) and despite asking for ID, I firmly believe that the electronic machines and counters make it one of the most corrupt voting processes I have ever dealt with.
Would not vote in a mosque, a church, or a temple.
Correct
You’d be quite challenged in the south.
When I still lived with my parents for a couple of years after registering to vote, the official polling place for our home address was a nearby church, which I always found a bit strange. The hole-in-the-wall municipality we lived in used meeting rooms at the same church for city council and zoning/board of adjustment meetings.
While not really a separation of church and state issue, it still struck me as an odd choice, since there was a library even closer to home that had suitable facilities. I’d have the same reaction to the use of a mosque, and these days knowing what I do, and having become far more suspicious and cynical, I’d be raising quite the alarm over such an arrangement.
It brings up an interesting situation many people here and in general need to at least think about. If we are a nation that has freedom of religion, than we have freedom of religion.
You cannot have freedom of speech, while banning some of it you don’t like. Same-same.
Most people here would be happy declaring the US a Christian nation, but food for thought. Both of my polling places since moving to TN have been baptist churches. Should I ask for a mail-in ballot accommodation?
I’d simply state that islam isn’t a religion. It’s an all encompassing political system conveniently presenting itself as a religion, to get a foothold in places it intends to conquer (which is all the places they don’t already control, as it happens). There, problem solved. Ban Islam as culturally incompatible with American/Western standards and be done with it.
Besides, the notion that there cannot be a state religion established is a joke. We have a state religion, it is wokeism and all the other shitty tenets of leftism in general. It isn’t officially declared or recognized as such, but it is absolutely the state religion, and it most assuredly is enforced by the government.
In that case I would still vote more so in a Baptist church than a satanic political Islamic cult temple of doom.
Using “separation of church and state” is such a lame excuse when it’s used the way most people do, like those in the comments here. Don’t get your hackles up—the excuse is lame, not those uttering it. SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE means that the government cannot require its citizens to worship according to the religion practiced by the king/president. It also cannot demand that its citizens identify with any established religion but can choose agnosticism or atheism instead. Because England required its citizens to worship the same religion as the king, our Founding Fathers included that stipulation in the First Amendment. BY THE WAY, go ahead and refuse to vote because you don’t like the voting location and you will be playing right into the hands of the enemy.
I fully understand that, so don’t misinterpret the intent of my previous comment. And I agreed, “separation of church and state” as a concept has been misconstrued my many, if not most people, and that this incorrect notion of what it meant was specifically pushed for reasons of political opportunism (as usual).
Voting should occur at a neutral location to eliminate any bias or perception of bias.
Who would want to go to HELL to vote?
Really, who would want to vote? We’ve seen what it gets us.
I sure would vote at a mosque….. wearing my pure bacon flip flops….
Right answer.
Lee—good idea!! I could wear a necklace of fried bacon and enjoy it while waiting in line to vote. Nothing like bacon-breath to keep the enemy at arm’s length. I don’t see much value in federal elections but it does make more work for the cheaters.
As if anyone even would suggest that the PTB in Alpharetta don’t know that conservatives would reject this. I submit that all voting places should be in pork meat-packing plants.
The problem is, the Christians in Alpharetta won’t do anything, they’ll simply not show up, rather than protest out loud and demand a neutral, non-religious place to vote. Another win for the death cult of Islam. Suicide by a thousand cuts. Literally.
But I’m just an Islamophobe, according to them. BS. A phobia is an IRRATIONAL fear. There’s nothing irrational about fearing the takeover of our country by filthy, Godless barbarians one precinct at a time, until there are none left.
TINVOWOOT!!!!
Leave a Reply