Comment: As I watch these discussions all I think about first is none of these will work any different than the current system in the long run without major thought process changes. But to be honest in my opinion of all the choices so far unless we get a benevolent strong man with a America 1st, last and always belief it will always end the same way, rotting from within.
I didn’t reveal the source of the material in this exercise previously so as to not prejudice the reader against it. The reader may be surprised to learn that the platform outlined in this exercise is National Socialism Fundamentals – Original writings by Jack Eltis, Former White Australia/National Socialist Network, NSW State Leader. I read a lot of different things ideological, and as I read through this work I considered all the problems we have in America and wondered if any part of this platform could be utilized, modified, or adapted to solve them.
Some readers may gasp at any positive mention of a system associated with the most evil regime in all human history. Was it? Really? The most evil? Allow me to ask, why are we taught this? Why is this the picture we are presented? Even were we to accept the Holocaust as an actual event rather than Jewish propaganda, both Stalin and Mao, Communists, killed more. They get a strong pass, but National Socialism that stood against Communism does not. So let’s see, a national spiritual and economic revival, a beloved leader, escape from central banks, a focus on family and Folk, and willingness to oppose Communism. Presented to us as racist and evil.
The Enlightenment offered us individual freedom, much of which was enshrined in our Constitution. I would suggest the ultimate result of an exaggerated attachment to that individual freedom has allowed it to be used as a cudgel against the Folk. It has ultimately led to the celebration of homosexuality, the normalization of the use of pornography, transgenderism, multiple genders, feminism, women’s suffrage, the destruction of tradition, the invitation and tolerance of an alien and destructive religion (Islam), racial integration, abortion ‘rights’, miscegenation, the notion that diversity is our strength, the destruction of meritocracy, an elite class that deems themselves demigods, the bastardization of our Republican form of government, the disregard of the rights of citizens, and the loss of our national sovereignty.
It would seem that we have come dangerously close to what is described in the Christian Bible with Judges 21:25 – In those days there was no king in Israel; everyone did what was right in his own eyes.
The Germans recognized similar problems in the Weimar Republic to those we face in what’s left of the American Republic today. They didn’t get themselves a king, but they did get a strong leader. When the National Socialists took power, the tolerance for all the above mentioned nonsense was eliminated. Short of such a drastic change in political direction, is there a way to put guardrails on our freedoms to eliminate these dangers to the Folk?
While imperfect, the Germans at least made an attempt to overcome these dangers. It’s almost like someone wants to be certain no other country ever decides to try such a thing again. I would submit that some portions of the platform outlined in the Thought Exercise could correct many of the problems that we now face in the West.
One should be able to recognize that regardless of whether one accepts all, some, or none of the planks in the platform, the over-riding motivation was the benefit of the Folk. Not the state, not industry, not the banks, not speculators, but the Folk.
There is Socialism as we’ve come to experience it (Marxist leaning), and Socialism (Folkish) as experienced in National Socialist Germany. Not the same. Even better would be Socialism of the tribe – bottom up.
Comment: Yes, it has become the National Socialism of the race nation, China. And don’t let the “Socialism” fool you: It produces more billionaires than other nation. It works, Communism doesn’t.
Don’t we find it interesting that since America established diversity is our strength, that the homogeneous nations are surpassing us?
Final note.
I’m not suggesting National Socialist Germany was without problems. Things were done in the war that were outrageous on their face, but to avoid total hypocrisy, what did the United States and Britain do to Hamburg and Dresden? To Hiroshima and Nagasaki? There was also the tyrannical top down brutality of the Gestapo. So, I’m not advocating for National Socialism. I’m merely pointing out that some of the planks in their platform could be adapted to benefit our Folk – White Heritage Americans – today. Hopefully this series has caused some to re-assess their understandings based on the material provided.
Again, thank you for your participation and attention. I look forward to meeting some of you at PatCon.
Leave a Reply