No. Israeli Supreme Court ruled in 2018 (CrimA 7128/16) that sexual offenses apply only to living persons, so necrophilia is not a criminal offense under the Penal Law regardless of the deceased's age. No later legislation has changed this.
If the DOJ would follow the law, there would be no reason for Massie’s discharge petition. Someone should tell the “Speaker” that when Congress passes laws and the DOJ refuses to enforce it, then Congress has no power.
The reality is that Trump, Congress and the Supreme Court are all controlled by Israeli money and blackmail. At some point, the American people will rise up against evil. Unfortunately, that should have happened when Obama stole his second term. It should have happened when Obama stole his third term. Or when the US funded SARS-COV2 was released. Or when the vaxx was released. Or when the war between Ukraine and Russia was manufactured. Or when…
Did you know that in 1988, the US Navy shot down an Iranian civilian airliner over the Persian Gulf, killing all 290 people on board, 66 of whom were children?
And did you know that the US military later awarded the commander who ordered the missile launch? https://t.co/eSeOtzSK1S
You realize, Mr, secretary, you just admitted to a war crime.
While we’re in a war with Iran, you openly admitted to attacking defenseless civilian ships after our military was attacked. You are authorized under the laws of war and American military law to attack their military… https://t.co/XsI8SuFn1E
Enemy oil tankers start as civilian objects. They become lawful military objectives only if they make an effective contribution to military action and destroying them offers a definite military advantage. The United States treats “war-sustaining” assets—oil exports that finance Iran’s war effort—as meeting that test. Many other states and the San Remo Manual take a narrower view: mere revenue generation is too remote, so ordinary commercial tankers remain protected unless they carry military cargo, act as auxiliaries, resist visit-and-search, or otherwise directly support operations.
Calling the ships “defenseless civilians” therefore does not settle the question. Under U.S. doctrine they can be captured as prize or, in some circumstances, attacked. Whether any specific strike would still violate distinction, proportionality, or precautions depends on the facts at the time—not on Hegseth’s public warning alone. Davis is right that the policy is aggressive and risks escalation; he is not right that it is automatically a war crime.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It seems like a war crime to me. Both sides are doing it. I would not want Grok being a judge in a court of law deciding this case.
The bottom line is that the Iranian Military Action by Trump is escalating. When the oil stops greasing the wheels of commerce, industrial production and distribution of base compounds, WWIII will be the only option left.
BREAKING: Iran has DIRECTLY STRUCK SIX SHIPS with ANTI-SHIP MISSILES in the Strait of Hormuz and surrounding waters — its LARGEST-EVER ATTACK in the strategic waterway, according to the IRGC.
The attack came in response to this morning’s U.S. strike on THREE Iranian oil tankers…
Another way to put this… in five years you will no longer serve any purpose. I predict sooner.
Consider this… you likely have about three years, at the most, to learn a skill that CANNOT be performed by a robot, or learn how to be entirely self-sufficient, still have some ability to pay your property taxes, and essentially live on what you can produce or trade with others.
I asked Grok about this…
“Humans do not become irrelevant just because robots outproduce them on labor metrics. Musk’s recent statements (primarily the G20 remarks and earlier Forbes comments) project ~1 billion humanoid robots in ~10 years (with a looser “maybe a billion” possibility in 5), each potentially ~5× a human’s output, so their aggregate productivity exceeds humanity’s. Recursive manufacturing accelerates this. That is a serious forecast of extreme abundance in goods and services, not a literal extinction of human value.
Productivity is not the sole measure of relevance. Consciousness, subjective experience, relationships, curiosity, aesthetic judgment, moral agency, and the capacity to set goals for the systems themselves remain human (or at least biological) domains for the foreseeable future. An economy that can produce almost anything does not automatically answer “what is worth producing or experiencing?”
Practical responses for people who take the timeline seriously
Own a claim on the productivity. Capital ownership is the most direct hedge. Equity in the companies building the AI, chips, energy, and robots (and the infrastructure around them) captures the upside of the abundance. Physical assets that remain scarce—well-located land, energy production, certain commodities—also retain value when labor is abundant and capital is the bottleneck. Pure wage dependence becomes riskier.
Shift from “selling hours” to “directing or creating.” The scarce skills move upstream: defining problems worth solving, high-level system design, taste/curation, scientific curiosity, and governance of the machines. People who can productively use the robots and AI as leverage (rather than compete with them on routine execution) stay useful longer.
Treat purpose as a separate problem from income. In an abundance scenario the economic problem shrinks; the meaning problem grows. Historical precedents (aristocracies, early retirees, certain religious or scholarly communities) show that humans invent status, achievement, exploration, art, relationships, and self-mastery when material scarcity drops. Deliberately cultivate non-instrumental activities—deep relationships, physical mastery, creative work that is not optimized for market value, understanding the universe—before the transition forces the issue.
Build optionality and resilience. Geographic mobility, multiple income streams during the transition, strong social networks, and basic competence in the tools (prompting, robotics interfaces, data) reduce fragility. Avoid lifestyle inflation that assumes permanent high returns to average human labor.
Engage the governance layer. The distribution of the gains, the alignment of the systems, energy constraints, and safety are not automatic. People who understand the trajectory early can influence policy, standards, and culture around ownership, universal basic provision, and what “human flourishing” means when labor is optional. Ignoring the politics cedes the outcome to others.
Musk has repeatedly framed the upside as an “age of abundance” in which work becomes optional and people pursue what they find meaningful; the downside risks are misalignment, concentrated control, or energy/resource bottlenecks rather than simple obsolescence of all humans. The individuals who recognize the scale earliest are best positioned to own assets, shape norms, and invent the post-labor purposes rather than wait to be told what they are. The alternative—assuming total irrelevance and paralysis—is self-fulfilling and unnecessary.”
We’ll see. I would love to believe it’s true. Hopium.
I suppose that those people who realize that they can build a home for $30,000 instead of $400,000, heat and cool that home for nothing, or pennies at most, and stop signing up for astronomical amounts of debt, may fare well… if you live in the Southeast, this makes a fantastic building material that will last virtually forever.
Better to anticipate, to the best of your ability, what you will need for the rest of your life, before you can no longer afford it and your UBI covers exactly what you need and nothing more…
I asked BraveAI about Universal Basic Income…
“Elon Musk has not specified a definitive monthly dollar amount for his proposed Universal High Income (UHI), but he has cited $3,000 per month as an illustrative figure that would become a “genuinely prosperous life” if AI and robotics reduce the cost of living by more than half.
Musk distinguishes UHI from traditional Universal Basic Income (UBI), arguing that AI and robotics will produce goods and services far in excess of money supply growth, eliminating inflation and making work optional within approximately 20 years. He posits that this abundance will render poverty obsolete and money “irrelevant,” shifting the societal challenge from financial survival to finding meaning without mandatory labor.”
Practical skills will be critical in the very near future.
I posted this because it reminded me of an incident that changed my outlook on life. I had a client come into my office and started to shout at me about some work we had done for him. I considered him to be a friend and his comments were not based in facts. I considered shouting back but was told to do a simple act. I asked him why he was upset. He immediately calmed down and told me that he had just come from a construction meeting that had not gone well.
I realized that he was taking out his frustration on me and just listened. Because people do not listen to other people. That experience taught me to ask people what I could do to help them. I was surprised at their responses and the change in their attitude.
I personally do not physically want anything from other people. I do want people to research and make decisions based on facts. I do not want people to “take my word” on an issue to base their decisions.
I have also found that asking questions can quickly determine another person’s state of mind. Everyone has seen it: you ask a question and the person lashes out irrationally. There is nothing you can do with frustrated people who live in fear and denial. I wonder what would happen if people just asked other people how they can be of assistance?
Trump knew about the issues with beef production and FDA requirements long before being “enlightened” by Glenn Beck. This is an appeasement which will do nothing to alleviate our food poisoning and high pricing.
Buying meat from Argentina is a payout to both Milei and Israel. Israel is pulling the same strings in Argentina as they are in the United States.
I would like to think that Americans are more aware of how evil the government has become. Oh look, a deer. What time does the football game start?
The Clinton administration told us the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing was a lone wolf attack by a deranged white supremacist. That’s not true. Kathy Sanders lost two grandchildren that day. She’s spent thirty years gathering the facts.
In a TOTALLY UNPRECIDENTED event, the Judge in the Lindsay Clancy has given Clancy's defense an HOUR to petition Massachusetts' supreme court to REMOVE the lone juror blocking Clancy's acquittal
The mistrial he declared just moments ago is now ON HOLD.…
If found not criminally responsible, Lindsay Clancy would not go free.
The murder charges would be dismissed, but she’d stay in a secure psych facility: up to 40 days observation, then a 6-month commitment that can be renewed yearly with no time limit if she’s still deemed mentally ill and dangerous.
Release requires a later court finding she’s no longer a threat. The DA can oppose it. In homicide NCR cases this often lasts years or decades.
Anyone under about 35 years old won’t understand the reference. This is what it looks like when you are plugging the VCR into the TV, and I don’t think they’re getting ready to play their old bootleg copy of Star Wars.
Now you are calling me a liar and i didn’t serve , you are telling me some nonsense on stolen…