Pre-Covid, it was very hard to believe that the entire medical establishment was actually trying to kill people. Now that 75 percent of the population has been injected with heart attack and turbo cancer machines due to a man-made disease that never threatened the vast majority of the population, people are starting to look a little harder at other serious medical issues:
DOCTORS ARE LITERALLY MANUFACTURING ALZHEIMER’S
Dr. Joel Wallach: “Alzheimer’s is a PHYSICIAN-CAUSED disease.”
Your brain is 75% myelin insulation. And myelin is 100% cholesterol.
Statins shred that cholesterol — stealing 75% of what your brain desperately needs to stay insulated and functional.
No myelin = no brain. That’s why Alzheimer’s went from virtually unknown to the 4th leading killer over age 65.
They told you to lower your cholesterol…while your brain was starving for it.
This isn’t “aging.” This is medical malpractice on a massive scale.
This observation is just anecdotal, but I only know three people in the two previous generations who had some form of dementia before they died. However, all three of them were on statins…
At this point, you couldn’t pay me to take any medication or prescription that doesn’t have an immediate, obvious, and observably beneficial effect. No matter what the numbers on the printout say.
Most Christian Americans would say no. What is a good test to see if they believe that? Let’s look at Christmas. It is a celebration of the birth of the Christ. I like the saying “the reason for the season” since the commercialization is little more than heresy at this point. Christmas for the government is a means to collect more taxes, show a skewed unemployment number and state that the economy is improving.
How many people know that Christmas is the only officially recognized religious holiday recognized by the government? Here is the government’s logic:
Christmas became a federal holiday in 1870 (one of the original four, alongside New Year’s, Independence Day, and Thanksgiving). Courts have upheld its status, ruling that it has become largely secularized in American culture and that recognizing it does not violate the Establishment Clause.
The ruling is correct: the celebration coincides with the Winter solstice, not the true birth of Christ several months earlier.
I am one quarter German and I find solace in Germanic culture as do most Americans. Do you put up a Christmas tree, have an Advent wreath or calendar, shop at Christmas markets, bake gingerbread houses, display nutcrackers, eat certain foods and have glass ornaments/tinsel? All originated in Germany. It is part of our culture and I find comfort in traditions at Christmas. I find more comfort in the birth of Jesus Chris. I have never considered these Germanic traditions as a reason to support Nordic or Germanic gods.
I also want to be a good steward of the earth as I believe the Lord intended. That does not make me believe in minor earth deities in any fashion.
Does the idea of looking at other religions tempt me to change my faith? No. If Roth’s posts give you pause to accept a different religious viewpoint, I have to ask how strong is your faith? I have considered the question of character and trusting people in the coming war(s). Is this a question of a heathen vs a Christian?
Here is the real question that I ask myself: how many self-professed Christians would I trust? We all see it: the Sunday Christian who acts immorally once he leaves Church, the Chreaster who goes to church on Christmas and Easter or any other trait which a Christian should have according to the Bible but is lacking.
How many of you are afraid of the future? The Bible states if you have fear, you have no faith in God’s plan. The only fear you should have is that of the Lord.
If I have doubts, I turn to the Bible, prayer and self reflection. That is not to say that I do not look to other sources for clarification; especially for translations and cultural norms. What have I learned this year? People will do anything to divide us. My purpose at the now cancelled PATCON was to find common ground to unite communities. Another failure on my part.
What a difference a few weeks makes. I was shown to have a PATCON here and I did not want to do it. I may go into those reasons later but I kept getting nudges for several months and acquiesced. I was strongly encouraged as everything fell into place. Hans’ roundtable on good and evil would transition in my roundtable on local governance. Then Concerned American would transition into how to make a better future. I felt that this would be a positive path forward that would help people build better communities.
As they say “the best laid plans of mice and men can still go wrong”. I was notified today that Concerned American has a scheduling conflict and will not be attending.
So did I misinterpret the intent of the messages or was I supposed to learn from it? I would have no personal gain from this meeting but it is possible that I misinterpreted the message. If I look at this from another perspective, what did I learn?
We are divided and nothing will change until we have suffered more.
I need to be more selective with people whom I have given my trust.
Operational security should now be a major consideration for all of us.
I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused. The readers here have been apprised of the PATCON and subsequent events concerning it. What are your thoughts and what have you learned?
Most of us are wondering how we got to this point in our country. Debt, immorality, evil and division reign supreme. I see the Christian Bible marginalized, attacked and misinterpreted everywhere including this site. It is not what I intended. Here is an example concerning turning the other cheek.
I will not change in my beliefs for I have seen and been shown too much. My faith is not just faith but what I have learned while I was studying for my masters in Bioinformatics. The intelligence behind “evolution” was undeniable. Notice that I am not trying to convert anyone to “my way” of thinking. I do ask that everyone do their own research and study the Bible. This will result in questions that only you can answer and I believe that also is for a higher purpose.
No one will be asked to abandon their faith by any post by me. I will encourage people to edify their souls but only they can do that.
How can we end the division? We can recognize that the fight against evil is our unifying purpose. I do not see that happening in the country or even here on this site.
If we are fighting instead of unifying, we have lost. And I must tell you that I see little chance of this happening. I will not vilify people who still support Trump but I am confused by their lack of discernment.
We are in the endgame: the debt has bankrupted the country, US Treasuries are collapsing which means the US dollar is collapsing, our military has been given to Israel and our children have no hope. That last item is the real killer as they will turn against our culture and surrender to Socialism as their path forward.
I admit that this site takes time to manage and I will admit that if I was a better man, I would recognize the fact that it needs more time to oversee than I have given it. I will be writing more on this shortly.
Sometimes you have to seek solace in self-reflection. This is not a rhetorical question but it is a question that I want people to ask themselves. Does President Trump sound like a man who is looking after Americans’ interests?
What follows emerges from seventeen months of examination into procedural collapses, constitutional erosions, and institutional betrayals that have accelerated beyond the capacity of conventional reportage to capture. Sources include former jurists who resigned rather than participate in predetermined outcomes, law enforcement officials who documented unlawful commands, and archival materials that reveal pattern precedents for contemporary ruptures. We present this analysis not to provoke despair, but to examine the anatomy of dissolution while recognition might still permit response. The reader is advised that the trajectory described has proceeded beyond the point where electoral mechanisms offer remedy, and that preparation for post-constitutional conditions constitutes rational response to empirical observation.
The bullet points …
The Fracturing: When Marble Crumbles Beneath Velvet
The Inversion: How Protection Became Predation
The Dissolution: Precedents of Collapse
The Documentation: Evidence Accumulating in Shadows
The Mechanism: How Legitimacy Dissolves Without Announcement
38. In a sick and dying nation, culture, race or civilization, political dissent and traditional values will be labeled and persecuted as heinous crimes by inquisitors clothing themselves in jingoistic patriotism.
39. A People who are ignorant of their past will defile the present and destroy the future.
40. A race must honor above all earthly things, those who have given their lives or freedom for the preservation of the folk.
41. The folk, namely the members of the Race, are the Nation. Racial loyalties must always supersede geographical and national boundaries. If this is taught and understood, it will end fratricidal wars. Wars must not be fought for the benefit of another race.
42. The Nation’s leaders are not rulers, they are servants and guardians. They are not to serve for personal gain. Choose only a guardian who has no interest in the accumulation of material things.
43. Choose and judge your leaders, also called guardians, thus: Those who seek always to limit the power of government are of good heart and conscience. Those who seek to expand the power of government are base tyrants.
44. No government can give anything to anybody without first taking it from another. Government is, by its very nature, legalized taking. A limited amount of government is a necessary burden for national defense and internal order. Anything more is counterproductive to freedom and liberty.
45. The Organic founding Law, namely the Constitution of a Nation, must not be amendable by any method other than unanimous consent of all parties thereto and with all parties present. Otherwise, the doors are opened for the advent of that most dangerous and deadly form of government, democracy.
46. In a democracy those who control the media, and thus the minds of the electorate, have power undreamed by kings or dictators.
47. The simplest way to describe a democracy is this: Three people form a government, each having one vote. Then two of them vote to steal the wealth of the third.
48. The latter stages of a democracy are filled with foreign wars, because the bankrupt system attempts to preserve itself by plundering other nations.
49. In a democracy that which is legal is seldom moral, and that which is moral is often illegal.
50. A democracy is always followed by a strongman… some call him dictator. It is the only way to restore order out of the chaos caused by a democracy. Pick your strongman wisely! He must be a guardian in his heart. He must be one who has shown that his only purpose in life is the preservation of the folk. His ultimate aim must be to restore the rule of Law based on the perfect Laws of Nature. Do not choose him by his words. Choose one who has sacrificed all in the face of tyranny; choose one who has endured and persevered. This is the only reliable evidence of his worthiness and motives.
This is an unpopular opinion I am reluctantly coming to more and more—namely, that Hamilton and Lincoln were working for the City of London and were, in fact, bad guys, traitors to the Republic even:
Look at the actions and the structures they left standing. The official stories emphasize necessity, patriotism, and later success. The ledger of what they actually did, and what those acts produced, is different.
Hamilton’s program was not abstract theory. He funded the Revolutionary and Confederation debts at (or near) par, assumed the state debts, and created a class of public creditors whose fortunes were now tied to the federal government’s solvency and expansion. Speculators who had bought the paper cheap from original holders—often soldiers and farmers—were made whole. He then chartered the First Bank of the United States on the Bank of England model: privately directed, government-linked, issuer of notes, fiscal agent. He invoked implied powers to get it done. He pushed tariffs and a Report on Manufactures that treated industrial development as a national project requiring federal direction.
The immediate results were creditworthiness and liquid securities markets. Foreign capital, much of it from London and Amsterdam, flowed in. New York began its rise as a financial center. The longer results were a permanent funded national debt treated as an instrument of state power, a banking system that concentrated influence among a relatively small group of urban financiers, and a federal government with the fiscal machinery to act like a European great power. Jefferson’s agrarian, state-centered republic lost the economic contest. The “national blessing” of funded debt became the template. Later central banking, from the Second Bank through the National Banking System to the Fed, sits on that foundation.
Lincoln’s actions completed the shift. He used war to prevent secession and then used the war’s emergency to enact the National Banking Acts. National banks were required to hold U.S. bonds as the basis for their note issue. A prohibitive tax was placed on state-bank notes. The old decentralized state-banking system was subordinated or crushed. Greenbacks introduced government-issued fiat. Protective tariffs were raised and kept high. Massive federal land grants went to railroads. An income tax and internal-revenue machinery appeared. The Southern planter class—the last major competing power base of landed wealth and state-sovereignty claims—was broken by invasion, emancipation without compensation, and Reconstruction.
What followed was not restoration of the pre-1861 compact. It was a more centralized fiscal-military state, a national currency and debt market, and financial power increasingly routed through New York. The National Banking System created a reserve hierarchy that funneled funds toward Wall Street. Panics continued (1873, 1893, 1907), but the architecture now favored national banks and federal debt. The political economy that emerged was industrial, protectionist, and credit-based. The Jeffersonian/Jacksonian alternative—limited federal power, state banking, low tariffs, agrarian weight—did not recover. By the Gilded Age the United States was operating as a Hamiltonian commercial republic. The later Federal Reserve was an evolution, not a rupture.
The City of London connection is structural, not a spy novel. The techniques Hamilton copied—funded debt, a privileged bank of issue, a market in government securities—were British. Early American credit depended on European (heavily British and Dutch) buyers. After 1865 British capital financed much of the railroad and industrial expansion that the new national system enabled. The United States adopted the playbook, scaled it, on behalf of the City of London. That is how financial systems actually own and control all: by imitation of working machinery and by capital flows, not by secret commissions.
Both men died before the full settlement was visible. Hamilton was killed in 1804 while Jeffersonians still held the presidency and the system remained contested. Lincoln was killed in 1865 as Reconstruction and the Gilded Age industrial-financial order were only beginning. Martyrdom made it easier to treat the new structures as sacred rather than as the product of specific policy choices that transferred power from states and landed interests to the federal government and its allied financiers and industrialists. Reputation campaigns built on the story of a martyred man were proliferated by British-backed publishers and press, both direct to the public and through control of schoolhouse curriculums.
The Revolution’s political independence was real. The financial and federal order that replaced the old republic of relatively sovereign states was Hamiltonian, then Lincolnian. That is what the actions produced. And now our masters seek to not restore to us what our Founding Fathers gave us, but to refinance this imperial system embedded by two dead men and many others since.
And this: Stop looking at what the official histories say and start looking at what actually happened. The two are rarely the same. Our enslavement is in what happened, not in what has been written about it. PsyOps did not begin in this century or the last. They began long ago.
They once had run free through the desert mountains of the West, a multicolored band of 68 wild mustangs that had never been saddled or corralled.
Then the federal government rounded them up with helicopters, as it has with tens of thousands of other mustangs, in an attempt to control wild populations on public lands. … The horses were packed into echoing metal trailers and trucked 1,800 miles east to the pens of a hard-luck livestock trader in Ohio named Brandon Jones, who bought them for $25 each.
A day later, two double-decker cattle trucks pulled up at midnight, loaded the mustangs and quickly drove off into the night.
From there the mustangs disappeared. They never appeared at a public auction. The trader won’t say where they went. Wild horse advocates suspect the horses were shipped to slaughter. … It wasn’t the first time, or the last. In the past year, the government has shipped the trader one truckload of mustangs after another. And not just him.
Writing on his own Truth Social platform on Friday, Trump announced the US would allow an additional 300,000 metric tons of ground beef to be imported without additional tariffs being imposed on suppliers. The President claimed the deal would “substantially lower the price of ground beef for working American families”. … “We have a commitment that this beef will be sold at 25 per cent below current market prices. This deal will reduce prices for Americans while giving space for our Great American Beef Herd to grow again.” … A reporter can be heard asking: “On that beef deal, which countries did you make that deal with?” Trump cuts her off, asking: “Which deal?”, to which she responds: “The beef deal.”
Responding, Trump says: “I don’t want to say which countries, but there are a few countries, but they’re going to be sending in the highest quality beef, and it’s something that we need.”
Does it matter?
Isn’t it a wonder of nature that beasts fed on grass taste so well?
Some commentors here have accused me of division. Let’s discuss that from a biblical perspective. I have attempted to show respect and consideration for those readers who are zealous Christians and have been ridiculed by at least one commentor for it. It may surprise some to know that there are very likely many non-Christians in the readership as has been suggested by some of the comments. One can be a Christian, an agnostic, an atheist, or following The Old Ways and still want to fight evil and provide for a better future for our Folk.
My posts cover geo-political and historic topics. Some of the historical topics sometimes bleed over into the religious because … history. Many of my posts encourage unified resistance of we White Folk of European descent against what appears to be a united opposition that seeks our destruction.
While many comments and some posts at this site promote Christianity, anything I post pertaining to The Old Ways is angrily attacked by what I view as a minority of overly zealous religionists. Even the beautiful art work depicting our ancestors has been criticized.
So allow me to pose a question. Aren’t Christians supposed to love their enemies, turn the other cheek, do good to those who do ill against them? Be meek? I suspect most people visiting this site are of European descent and I love you all.You are my Folk regardless of your religious proclivities. One would think by reading some of the attacks on my posts that I am that enemy doing ill against you. I am not. I would posit that I, a heathen, has better held to those admonitions of your faith than some commentors. We should just disagree amicably, as gentlemen, not with snarky, antagonistic assaults. Killing the messenger will not kill the message.
Something I learned because I actually study. Charlemagne invaded Germania and killed our nobles and priests, destroyed our sacred groves and beheaded around 4,500 of my ancestors in Saxony (Germany) for refusing to accept the new religion. Pretty much like the Muslims – convert or die. Again … history, not an attack on anyone’s religion. However, this doesn’t sound much like something a loving Father would condone. Were it not for Charlemagne and his Frankish army, we would all very likely still be following The Old Ways of our own European faith rather than the Jewish one. I sometimes wonder if my most vociferous attackers wouldn’t want to do the same to me as Charlemagne did to my ancestors, even if only symbolically through bullying and censure.
So as to division; let’s consider, what does the Bible relate? Who is Yahweh? The God of Israel; not Asia, not Africa, not Europe. The Bible relates that even Yahweh, himself, admits there are other gods, but he is a jealous conquering tribal war god. Who did Jesus come for? The lost sheep of Israel. Not Asians, African, or Europeans. What was Jesus doing? He was a reformer, the Martin Luther of Judaism. He wasn’t building a religion, but teaching a way of living and attempting to reform Judaism. The proto-Christians even called it The Way.
Paul was the one building a religion and pushing it on the Gentiles (Goyim). The true Apostles opposed him. Did Jesus not say that in order to follow him one has to hate his mother and father, sisters and brothers? And does the Bible not teach that Christians should shun non-believers? But those who admit to holding to The Old Ways and say so are causing division? Jesus said, “I didn’t come to bring peace, but a sword.” Don’t believe me. Read your Bible.
Regardless of how one wants to interpret all that, if we, those of the White race, want to survive, we must be united. We are one Folk, regardless of one’s religion. We are of the same blood.
I will continue to post as I have so long as I have use of the platform. I will continue to urge the unity between White Christian, agnostic, atheist, and heathen. If you don’t want to read my posts, don’t. If you do, even when I offer a Roth Note that it may be offensive to the religious sensibilities of some, then at least limit your comments to well reasoned and gentlemanly replies. And for those few of you so defensive of your professed Christianity – prove it by acting like a Christian – Christ follower, not a Muslim.
MUST WATCH: Parents at @WCPSS in NC are BLASTING the school board after the district hired a male transgender teacher and are reportedly forcing students to refer to him as a woman.
"Parents shouldn't have to pass an ideological test to participate in public education."
29. The concept of equality is declared a lie by every evidence of Nature. It is a search for the lowest common denominator, and its pursuit will destroy every superior race, nation, or culture. In order for a plow horse to run as fast as a race horse you would first have to cripple the race horse; conversely, in order for a race horse to pull as much as a plow horse, you would first have to cripple the plow horse. In either case, the pursuit of equality is the destruction of excellence.
30. The instincts for racial and species preservation are ordained by Nature.
31. Instincts are Nature’s perfect mechanism for the survival of each race and species. The human weakness of rationalizing situations for self-gratification must not be permitted to interfere with these instincts.
32. Miscegenation, that is race-mixing, is and has always been, the greatest threat to the survival of the Aryan race.
33. Inter-species compassion is contrary to the Laws of Nature and is, therefore, suicidal. If a wolf were to intercede to save a lamb from a lion, he would be killed. Today, we see the White man taxed so heavily that he cannot afford children. The taxes raised are then used to support the breeding of tens of millions of non-whites, many of whom then demand the last White females for breeding partners. As you can see, man is subject to all the Laws of Nature. This has nothing to do with morality, hatred, good or evil. Nature does not recognize the concepts of good and evil in inter-species relationships. If the lion eats the lamb, it is good for the lion and evil for the lamb. If the lamb escapes and the lion starves, it is good for the lamb and evil for the lion. So, we see the same incident is labeled both good and evil. This cannot be, for there are no contradictions within Nature’s Laws.
34. The instinct for sexual union is part of Nature’s perfect mechanism for species preservation. It begins early in life and often continues until late in life. It must not be repressed; it’s purpose, reproduction, must not be thwarted either. Understand that for thousands of years our females bore children at an early age. Now, in an attempt to conform to and compete in an alien culture, they deny their Nature-ordained instincts and duties. Teach responsibility, but, also, have understanding. The life of a race springs from the wombs of its women. He who would judge must first understand the difference between what is good and what is right.
35. Homosexuality is a crime against Nature. All Nature declares the purpose of the instinct for sexual union is reproduction and thus, preservation of the species. The overpowering male sex drive must be channeled toward possession of females, as well as elements such as territory and power, which are necessary to keep them.
36. Sexual pornography degrades the Nature of all who are involved. A beautiful nude woman is art; a camera between her knees to explore her private parts is pornography.
37. That race whose males will not fight to death to keep and mate with their females will perish. Any White man with healthy instincts feels disgust and revulsion when he sees a woman of his race with a man of another race. Those, who today control the media and affairs of the Western World, teach that this is wrong and shameful. They label it “racism.” As any “ism,” for instance the word “nationalism,” means to promote one’s own nation; “racism” merely means to promote and protect the life of one’s own race. It is, perhaps, the proudest word in existence. Any man who disobeys these instincts is anti-Nature.
Very sad, from what I know about her she was a very kind person who was very generous with helping…