Latest Articles

  • The Finite Creed

    How the Roman Regime Used Christianity to Simplify Thought and Subdue the Mind

    What Rome accomplished in the fourth century wasn’t a religious conversion. It was the largest successfully executed opening move of the Great Game in Western history — a deliberate act of cognitive disarmament, aimed at eliminating the mental infrastructure on which the Sport depends. What was destroyed wasn’t belief. It was the capacity for a specific kind of thought. And as we will trace across the essays that follow, the methodology has never changed. Only the instruments have.

    Control the cognitive field — the language, the permitted questions, the structure of available discourse — and raw intelligence becomes largely harmless. The brilliant mind, trained only in binary categories, produces brilliant arguments for binary conclusions. The Game requires nothing more.

    The Common Man is also a player in the infinite game — when allowed sophistication of thought, and even when not. This matters enormously. When the pagan tradition provided the common citizen with a cognitive world of genuine complexity — competing cults, philosophical schools, a universe of many gods and many truths — ordinary men and women were participants in the Sport whether they knew it by that name or not.

    But the common man retains a form of infinite-game advantage that no institutional framework can fully extinguish. He lives closer to base reality. He works with soil, weather, bodies, hunger, birth, death — with the irreducible, uncontrollable, unboundable fabric of existence that no creed can fully capture and no bureaucracy can fully manage. Hence the drive to end the small farmer, the man who lives close to and in daily communion with life and the earth, the old gods. 

    The Christianity that Rome weaponized in the fourth century wasn’t the Christianity of the first three centuries. The religion of the Apostles and the early Church was something strikingly different: rich, disputatious, philosophically sophisticated, and deeply engaged with the intellectual world it inhabited.

    This wasn’t the Christianity Constantine needed. The early Church’s intellectual diversity — its dozens of competing schools, its tolerance for paradox and mystery, its willingness to hold multiple cosmologies in tension — was precisely what made it resistant to the kind of imperial standardization the regime required. The Council of Nicaea in 325 CE wasn’t a theological summit. It was a hostile acquisition. Constantine didn’t patiently seek theological truth. He commanded hundreds of bishops to produce a single, rigid creed, and then he enforced it with the power of the state. His goal wasn’t the salvation of souls. It was the order of the empire: one God, one Emperor, one realm.

    What was destroyed at Nicaea — and in the decades of enforcement that followed — was not paganism alone. It was the Christianity of the first three centuries: the rich, philosophically open, sophisticated and intellectually demanding tradition that had spent three hundred years thinking carefully and complexly about the nature of reality. The regime didn’t adopt Christianity. It replaced it with a simplified version designed for governance. A version of binaries to be controlled. The distinction matters, because the war being described in these essays isn’t a war against Christianity. It’s a war against the same target Christianity itself was used to eliminate: the open epistemic system, the infinite cognitive space, the trained capacity for sophisticated thought.

    Christianity, as standardized and enforced by the imperial state, offered the cognitive simplification the regime required by collapsing the infinite cognitive space of both paganism and early Christianity into a severe and comfortable finitude. At the heart of the new enforced doctrine lay a binary code that sorted all of existence into mutually exclusive pairs: Saved or Damned, Good or Evil, Orthodoxy or Heresy, Faith or Unbelief.

    Every complex moral dilemma, every philosophical subtlety, every shade of grey was abruptly funneled into a single axis of judgment. There was no spectrum of virtue, no partial enlightenment, no noble pagan — only the stark division between the children of light and the children of darkness.

    And so we see today, from the perspective of the ‘elites’ there are the children of light (Progressives, Globalists, Zionists) and children of darkness (traditionalists, conservatives, true Christians, virtuous pagans). A new instrument, but the same tactic as that established in the 4th Century.

    Read the entire essay …

  • USS Liberty

  • Tucker – Trump Assassination Attempts

  • Coming Attractions

  • Wag the Dog

  • Pillage

    Definition per Merriam Webster:
    1: the act of looting or plundering especially in war

    2: something taken as booty

    h/t WRSA

  • Israel Wants War

    No surprise there …

    Whoever is pulling the strings of the Short Fat Trump is going to have to accept the fact that the two choices are between a) abandoning Israel to its self-chosen fate, whatever that might be, or b) suffering an abject defeat in the Middle East now that Israel is attempting to drag the US military back into another round of war with Iran.

    It’s obvious that Israel wanted to reignite the war, for exactly the same reason they started it. Their odds of avoiding complete defeat are better if the US and its bases are taking the majority of the damage. The interesting question is: why did they restart it via attacking Lebanon? I think there are two reasons.

    1. If they are going to take any new territory, it’s going to be in southern Lebanon.
    2. Striking Iran directly means strikes on all the US military bases in the Gulf States again, and there is a real risk of either the Gulf States kicking out the USA or the USA voluntarily withdrawing its forces and leaving Israel to fight Iran alone.

    Given the desperate way in which Trump is shouting “Peace is at hand” in direct contradiction to the evidence, I don’t think it’s a guarantee that the US military fully engages in this round. But if it does, I expect things to go even worse for both the US and Israeli militaries, although Israel does appear to be doing better against Hezbollah since the ceasefire started.

    Continue reading Vox Popoli …

    I believe that the Israeli decision to attack Beirut had one objective… force the Iranian hand in launching an attack on Israel in hopes of bringing the US back into the war and sabotaging any chance for Trump to sign a Pakistani peace deal with Iran. So far, the Israelis have failed. Donald Trump is staying on the sidelines for now, which has sparked mass hysteria among the neo-cons and Zionist fanatics.

    Continue reading Sonar21 …

  • Israel Isolates Gaza

  • Blackstone

  • Asian Bloodbath

  • An Interesting Premise

  • It’s Always Them

    There will never be peace if Israel is involved. So much for Trump’s assertions that he is in control earlier today.

  • 9.0 Earthquake

  • Bloodbath Incoming

  • What Was the Folkish Movement?

    A Brief Overview of Folkishness Before 1945


    The word “folkish” has seen an uptick in popularity in the English-speaking world in recent years. Although folkishness remains a minority position, the number of people who associate themselves with it is growing. Yet there is not much material in English that could provide an accessible overview of the original German folkish movement and its ideas in a manner which does not simply treat it as a subject for critique. It is hoped that this essay will go some way towards correcting that. Although I will touch on historical matters, this is not a history. It is an attempt to reconstruct the basic features of the folkish worldview and introduce some of the key thinkers and organisations. The essay will proceed from an outline of fundamental folkish concepts to their application to various fields, such as history, culture, politics, and religion. None of the accounts are exhaustive, but they should be sufficient to give the reader a working understanding of what the folkish worldview was before 1945 and what its implications were for life.

    The Völkische Bewegung (folkish movement) originated in late 19th century Germany, but it did not emerge sui generis. Its founders drew upon several earlier ideological currents. Three in particular stand out: German Romanticism, German nationalism, and biological and racial theories developed from the late 18th century onwards. German Romanticism was a source of many central ideas, including holism, organicism, a scepticism of Enlightenment rationalism, a respect for myth and tradition, and the conviction of the spiritual emptiness of modern civilisation. 

    The distinctive core of the folkish worldview during this period was a preoccupation with the idea of a folk (Volk). A folk may be defined provisionally as a group sharing common ancestry, language, culture, and collective consciousness. Examples include the German folk, the French folk, and the English folk.

    Importantly, there was no single religious approach in the folkish movement, although almost all of the leading figures were religious in some way. 

    Continue reading …

    From the essay: Chamberlain explained every great achievement of Western civilisation with reference to the quality of the racial stock at any given place and time. Rome ultimately fell because of “racial bastardisation”, Rome being a “cloaca gentium” or “drain of the peoples”. He speaks of a time when

    “…the people of ancient Rome had disappeared from the face of the earth and Rome was merely the administrative centre of a nationless mixture; whoever speaks of Rome talks of the chaos of races.”

    Now consider the USA in 2026 … See the similarity?

Menu

CADD Graphics

Laser Engraving by CADD Graphics

Carolina Readiness Supply

Social Media and Websites

NC Renegade on Twitter
NC Renegade on Gab
NC Renegade on Truth Social
Wes Rhinier on Gab


12 Round Blog
Barnhardt
Cold Fury
The Feral Irishman
Hammer’s Thor
Knuckledraggin My Life Away
Liberty’s Torch
90 Miles From Tyranny
Publius-Huldah’s Blog
Smoky Mountain Myco
Straight Line Logic
The Tactical Hermit
Western Rifle Shooters Association

Recent Comments

  1. Libre Office is good, I’ve used it for years. It pleases me to see this effort at replacing the major…

  2. Don’t count your chickens…I more expect some sort of settlement to be announced at a later date (well after the…

  3. I’ve been very fortunate to have solidly good health. I’ve not sought medical care inn the last 25-30 years excepting…

  4. How about all them Pajeet Docs nowadays? Where are all the American doctors? Why is that? Read link below and…