From Grok:

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian made these remarks in his September 23, 2026, UN General Assembly speech, accusing the international community of applying double standards on nuclear issues between Israel and Iran.

Pezeshkian highlighted Israel’s possession of nuclear weapons without NPT membership or IAEA inspections, while Iran faces scrutiny and reported attacks despite being an NPT signatory with a declared peaceful nuclear program.

The statement references high civilian casualties in Gaza and recent regional conflicts, framing Iran’s position as defensive amid ongoing US-Israel-Iran hostilities.

What is the price to buy freedom? Only an enslaved people would have to consider this question.

From Grok:

Neither side is inventing the treaty text; they are spinning the same document in opposite directions.

Trump’s claim of “permanent control over security and all other needs” is an overstatement. The agreement keeps Danish sovereignty and Greenland’s self-determination on paper, requires mutual agreement on implementation details for extra bases, and does not transfer ownership or give the US a blank check to do whatever it wants.

Denmark’s claim that the deal simply “acknowledges and respects” sovereignty and is just a stronger NATO arrangement understates the substance. The pact is open-ended, binds a future independent Greenland, locks in two additional US bases plus easier procedures for more sites, gives the US broad movement rights including undersea access, and creates an effective US veto on non-NATO military presence and on sensitive investments from countries outside NATO/EU. Those are real new constraints that go beyond the 1951 arrangement.

The gap is political framing after months of US pressure, not a hidden second treaty. Trump maximized the security win; Frederiksen maximized the “we kept the kingdom intact” line. The legal text sits between those two pitches.

I had one thought in mind when I watched this short clip: 84 years later and the people fell for it. We are enslaved, divided and will not rise up to fight.

She outlines all of the talking points people use to try to convince people to vote. And then destroys them. I may vote on some of the referendums but I have no illusions: voting is NOT going to remove evil selected “leaders”.

As for complaining, one man’s “complaining” may be another man’s wake up call. Denigrating telling the truth does not make it false.

So which box does that leave us? If you are unsure, consider this question:

Is the country better off under a Republican trifecta in the government?

This reminds me of David Copperfield asking “more please”. This legislation is unnecessary as it is self-evident. All men are created equal means one man equals one vote. Not multiple votes, not fraudulent votes – one vote. For those who say “but 3/5 of a vote” need to do research on who mandated this. Hint: it was not the South.

Now ask yourself how long this attempt has been going on in North Carolina?

Grok:

The modern push for photo voter ID in North Carolina began in 2011, when the newly Republican-controlled General Assembly passed a bill requiring government-issued photo ID; Democratic Gov. Bev Perdue vetoed it.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Rights are never given back by “legislation”. This pertains to all rights.