Do you know it, the call from ancient times?

Some among us know it.

For some people carry within them a memory that doesn’t come from this life. A longing that isn’t easily explained. Neither with logic nor with reason.

It’s as if they had once lived, thousands of years ago, in a time when humans didn’t yet fly through the skies with machines, but felt the breath of the earth with bare feet.

The world was different back then. No noise, no electric whirring in the air. Only the wind in the trees, the crackling of wood in the fire, and the distant cry of wolves in the night.

People lived in the cycle of the seasons, not to the beat of clocks.
Spring brought hope, and with it the tender green, the first buds, and young life. The children ran barefoot across the damp meadows, laughing while their mothers sowed seeds and blessed the soil with songs.

In summer, the fruits ripened, and the village was filled with the scent of herbs, laughter, and stories around the fire. In autumn, harvests were held, thanks were given, and celebrations were made.
And whenever winter came, life fell silent. People huddled together.
And they knew that warmth came not only from the fire, but from the heart.

In those days, every day was a connection to the earth, to the sun, to the rain, to the animals, to other people. They hunted not out of greed, but to live. They asked the spirit of the animal for forgiveness and thanked it for its gift. There was no mine or yours, only ours.
Woman and man stood side by side, not on top of each other. Children were not a burden, but the greatest gift. And over all watched the Great Mother, the earth herself, nurturing, protecting, and comforting.

Anyone who walks the streets today, lives between screens, and hears words that lack depth, can feel an emptiness that isn’t easily identifiable. A pulling in the chest. A silence, even when everything is so loud. I think it’s the longing for that time.

You feel like a stranger in this time. Not because there’s something wrong with you. But because you remember. Of a time you can’t grasp with your mind, but only with your soul. Of friendship that didn’t wait for messages, but for the shared silence while gathering wood. Of love that wasn’t based on profile pictures, but on glances, on shared actions, and on sharing life. Of a family that wasn’t created by blood alone, but by heart and responsibility.

I know what I’m saying now is such a painful thought, because your heart hasn’t forgotten.

But maybe, just maybe, you weren’t born too late, but are here right now to remind not only yourself, but others, that we are still part of a whole. Not separate. That we are nature. Not above it. That we may return home again, perhaps not to a distant time, but to a near feeling.

©Surturs Lohe

Not AI.

We estimate that the US red states after secession would have 51% of the US population, or 173 million. Add to that 6 million from Alberta & Saskatchewan. Of course the number would be much higher if the federal government causes a civil war, because the red states would take much more territory & population at the end of a war. Still, we shouldn’t take the whole US population – we’ve argued that governing the northeast US & eastern Canada is not worth the effort though, as we need a place to deport subversives to where they can find a livelihood.

Continue reading …

h/t WRSA

Personally, I see AI, like most technology, as a double edged sword. Used carefully it can be beneficial. The problem is that the nefarious potential to destroy jobs, drive the cost of electricity up, deplete water resources, and control the masses (make us all slaves of the oligarchs) is too great a risk to encourage support for AI. Push-back is occurring and Zerohedge has a post suggesting just that.

AI Is Losing The PR Battle And The Consequences Could Be Huge

A new national survey from Marquette University Law School should give the AI industry serious pause. According to the poll, roughly 70 percent of Americans believe artificial intelligence will do more harm than good for society. Even more striking, the skepticism cuts across party lines.

Poll Director Charles Franklin put it bluntly: “It really is striking … there’s pretty much bipartisan skepticism … That’s an awful lot of partisan agreement, where we normally see Republicans and Democrats on opposite ends.”

Every child that a mother gives birth to is a battle she fights for the existence or non-existence of her people.

Surely you don’t believe that sewer-dwellers, subhumans and degenerates are the real enemy?

They are but a symptom of idleness, a consequence of our non-action.

We’d conquer back everything within a week if we were to defeat first the true enemy: the weakling inside.

“Time alone will show whether you and I and a handful of others will renew the world. But we must renew ourselves every day; otherwise it will be hopeless.”
— Hermann Hesse: Demian

h/t The Wandering Spartan

Larry Johnson writes, “I received another piece of evidence today that the Russian/Chinese vision for a new security architecture is real and may be progressing. While chatting with a new friend who is well connected to Pakistan’s intelligence service (i.e., ISI), he told me that a very senior official in the ISI — his personal friend — told him earlier this week that Saudi Arabia and Qatar are going to cut security ties with the US… They reportedly want to move under a security umbrella offered by Russia and China. If true, this will mark further erosion in the US status as hegemon.”
Read his entire post at Sonar21 …

From Vox Popoli

If a ship is hit by a missile in the Gulf of Oman, but the Department of War denies it, does it make a sound?

-Reports are coming in indicating that at least four ships are on fire in the Gulf of Oman, near the Persian Gulf, after Iran fired missiles. The image above, from NASA FIRMS satellite data, shows fire ignition in the Strait of Hormuz off Oman’s Musandam province at 22:21 UTC, in roughly the same area where Iran’s IRGC Navy said three US destroyers were damaged and forced to “flee” toward the Sea of Oman.

– Reports are beginning to surface saying that during yesterday’s battle with Iran, ten (10) U.S. Sailors were wounded and Five (5) others are “Missing.” How could five Sailors be “Missing” unless they got blown off a Destroyer by the Concussion Wave of missile(s) impacting? Yet we’ve been told by US Officials that none of the missiles fired by Iran hit any of our ships.

The gap between what we’re told and what actually happened would appear to be growing.

You speak truth and they hear threat.
You show evidence and they see “extremism.”
You say “I’ve changed” and they reply, with perfect contempt, “Yeah… you’ve changed.”

It’s never admiration. It’s always an accusation.

Living fully in base reality isn’t “being right.”

It’s refusing—every single fucking day—to shrink back into the old skin for the sake of belonging, peace, or love.

It’s speaking the new dialect even when it costs you everything.

It’s becoming the mentor the village never asked for and never wanted.

The old world’s gone.

Your old self’s gone.

Now stop looking back.

Start building.

Read the entire Burlingame post

The following comment came from an article discussing the conflict between Iran and the United States:

“First, Iran is not the leading sponsor of terrorism” …. Prithee, then, who is? Johnson blithely tosses out that statement which then leaves the rest of the article in serious doubt. Poorly written and dubious.

Who is the leading sponsor of terrorism? Is this the right question or another attempt to divide us? Let’s start by Grok’s answer to my question to define terrorism in modern terms:

What the Concept Means in Today’s Practical Terms:

Terrorism is premeditated violence (or credible threat of it) by non-state actors (or clandestine state agents) directed at civilians or symbolic targets to generate fear far beyond the immediate victims, with the goal of forcing political, ideological, or social change. Key modern distinctions:

• Not ordinary crime: Motive must be political/ideological, not personal gain.
• Not legitimate warfare: Excludes acts in recognized armed conflicts governed by the laws of war (those can be war crimes instead).
• Evolving scope: Includes lone actors (“lone wolves”), cyber-enabled attacks, and ideologically driven domestic violence. Recent data (Global Terrorism Index 2026) notes a rise in politically motivated attacks amid global fragmentation. visionofhumanity.org
• Applies across ideologies: Right-wing, left-wing, religious, ethno-nationalist, environmental—any motive qualifies if it meets the criteria.

In short, the contemporary concept boils down to weaponized fear through unlawful violence against the innocent to achieve a political outcome. This framework guides counter-terrorism laws, prosecutions, and intelligence worldwide in 2026.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Based on the clarification above, Iran’s actions may be war crimes but not terrorism. But the trap is set: is terrorism the primary concern for the world at this point? Or should we limit the geography to the United States? Based on the news we see everyday, Americans are more concerned by attacks from black criminals than the actions of Iran. But even this type of terrorism is enabled and encouraged by the two-tiered justice system.

According to Grok, this is not even terrorism:

The alleged soft-on-crime approach is not terrorism under any current legal or operational definition. It lacks the required violent act by the enablers themselves. At most, it’s accused of facilitating ordinary crime for political ends—closer to dereliction, corruption, or strategic malpractice than terrorism. Terrorism is a tool of the powerless or ideological outsiders; this critique paints it as a tool of the powerful operating from within the system. Both seek fear-driven change, but one operates through the rule of law’s loopholes, the other by shattering it.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Let’s regroup and ask this question: what group or nation is most responsible for bringing about global economic change by destroying cultures, genocide and wars? When you consider this question, think about the following list:

1. Development of the SARS-COV2 virus.
2. Development of the gene therapies to treat COVID-19.
3. The color revolutions to overthrow governments around the world including the United States.
4. Manipulation of stock markets, commodities and foreign exchanges.
5. Wars since WWII and false flags.
6. Open borders in the West to destroy cultures and seize power in nations.
7. Voter fraud to select candidates and to implement a specific agenda.
8. Inflation, taxes and regulations to erase the wealth of the middle class.
9. Coverups: Epstein files, JFK and RFK assassinations, USS Liberty and the 2020 Presidential election.
10. Who funded the 911 attacks.

One group’s terrorism is another group’s freedom fight. See Israel’s formation. This approach to clarify our objectives is a start but not an end to a dystopian future. What if we define our true enemy, their agenda and actively start implementing a course of action to regain our fallen Republic and restore Liberty for our children?

Or we can continue to let false information and lies direct our actions.

Are there any major revelations?

From Grok:

No confirmation of alien life, extraterrestrial technology, or government cover-ups of crashes/retrievals. The release emphasizes transparency (“the American people can now access the federal government’s declassified UAP files instantly” and “make up their own minds”) rather than new scientific or intelligence breakthroughs. Officials (including Secretary of War Pete Hegseth) stress that past administrations downplayed the topic, but this effort is about maximum openness on unresolved cases only.

Early public and media reaction (including on Reddit’s r/UFOs megathread) is mixed: some appreciate the raw data dump and historical context, but many note it feels like “more of the same” murky footage and paperwork without smoking-gun proof. The site experienced glitches shortly after launch due to traffic, which may explain access issues.

In short, this is a significant transparency step compiling previously hard-to-access or redacted records in one place, including some never-publicly-released videos and astronaut observations. It adds to the public record but does not fundamentally change the official stance that these remain unexplained due to limited data—no ET revelations here. You can view the files directly at the site (more will be added over time).

Files here.