In a matter of days, once-pristine beaches in the Spanish enclave of Ceuta have been reduced to open-air dumps and disease-ridden camps occupied by thousands of illegal migrants who refused to leave after the mass invasion from Morocco.
Under this system, the leader is the best of the race. He leads out of service and duty to the race. It is his responsibility to carry our people forward to advancement and to ensure our racial survival.
The leader is a talented individual who rises from the collective pool of our blood, the strongest in character, will, intellect, and loyalty. He proves himself beyond doubt through struggle, ability, and devotion to the Folk over time. He is an embodiment of the will of the folk.
We reject the weakness and flaws inherent in democracy: mass rule and committees where responsibility and accountability are diluted and obfuscated through the parliamentary or congressional systems full of talkers and compromisers. Our leader bears total responsibility for successes and for failings. It’s been said, “Authority flows downward, responsibility upward.” The leader answers fully to the folk for every outcome.
Our race demands a strong leader who advances our people, or we degrade and fall into weakness and decline.
Roth Note: Now tell me what’s wrong with this and how would we select such a one?
People are often not afraid of evil itself—but rather of what they cannot control.
Fear makes people predictable. Those who are afraid seek security. And those who believe they have control are loath to give it up. For a loss of control implies uncertainty—and for many, uncertainty spells fear.
Thus, a dangerous cycle emerges:
Fear leads to a desire for control. Control leads to mistrust. Mistrust leads to isolation. And isolation, in turn, leads back to fear.
The situation becomes particularly dangerous when people begin to want to destroy the very thing they fear.
Perhaps not because the unknown poses an actual threat—but because its mere existence challenges the established order.
And this is precisely where one of the most important messages of science fiction may lie:
The alien—the unknown—need not be our enemy. It is our fear of it that might turn it into one.
Perhaps, then, we will one day face a crucial choice: Do we fight the unknown out of fear—or do we summon the courage to understand it?
For true strength may not lie in the ability to control everything.
True strength lies in the ability to let go of control without losing oneself.
Perhaps this is exactly what humanity must learn if it truly wishes to transcend its limitations.
Not to control everything.
Not to fight everything.
Not to destroy everything we do not understand.
But rather to find the courage, together, to face the unknown.
For perhaps humanity’s greatest enemy is not what exists outside of us.
Perhaps it is the fear within us.
What if the thing we fear has not come to destroy us, but to show us who we truly are?
“Overcome your fear of what you cannot control.” For if we manage that, everything changes: mistrust can turn into curiosity, separation into cooperation, and fear perhaps even into insight.
And perhaps that is precisely where true development begins—not when we understand everything, but when we have the courage not to understand something and yet not immediately want to destroy it.
David has asked me to make a further clarification including my motive. So, let’s try again. In Part 1 I began with:
Roth Note: I will suggest that there is no perfect government system. We’ve discovered that the system the Founders bequeathed to us was not sustainable over time. That said, I’d like to propose some aspects of a system that I think could work. I’m going to offer it up in parts so that the reader can consider and comment on each. I’m especially interested in comments on problems the reader might see in each part.
Following each post I’ve added:
Roth Note: Now tell me what’s wrong with this.
The anger that seems to have been generated is pretty surprising as those offended apparently overlooked these simple instructions for participation; participation which is not required. I was looking for informed opinions, not off-handed emotional responses. Most comments have been well thought out, but not all.
Then I posted the first clarification in an attempt to get everyone back on track and that was met with open hostility.
Neither I nor David have written what I’m posting in this exercise. It is from an independent source that I will reveal in due time along with a concluding post.
It is a CRITICAL THINKING exercise that I see from the comments some readers failing miserably. Rather than jump in with a knee-jerk reaction based on your preconceived notions, why not try tabula rasa? Tabula rasa is Latin for blank slate. Put all one’s prejudices and preconceived notions on the shelf and instead of reading into the text what you believe it says, let the text speak for itself. Then let it linger in your mind as you consider it before responding.
I must say some of the push-back has been quite good, but others have just been examples of propagandized minds. We can do better.
Why the anger? The whole reason for this series is to plumb your minds for how we might be able to begin something new. Certainly each of the planks represents an area where we, as a people, and our government have demonstrably failed, regardless of motive. So I’m offering a look at a system that succeeded rather well in another era – another time and place with a different people, in order that we might explore if any aspects of that platform might be used or modified for our use in the future.
Some of the readers seem to think I’m recommending this platform be swallowed hook-line and sinker. I say again. It is an exercise in critical thinking. There’s no need to read more into it than that. Please accept it as such. Continue to comment in a reasoned and thoughtful way after reading and considering each post. Then please also be patient and wait for the concluding summary post. It will be worth it.
Another way our system differs is the premise of class unity versus class division.
We call for total class unity throughout society. There is nothing wrong with classes. There will always be rich men, a middle class, aristocrats, and so on. Classes within society are unavoidable and are a result of natural order.
Those who work the hardest and possess natural aptitude, intellect and ability, the best of our Folk, should rise to the top in a healthy merit-based society. Harmonizing the classes in a united fashion, bound by common blood is vital because we are all a common folk (race) and it is destructive to the nation to be warring with one another.
We must all be united in constantly working towards a common goal, that being the advancement of our people as a racial collective. Marxism intentionally attempts to incite what they call “class war”, which is divisive and completely turns the race against one another and subverts the unity and cohesion of the nation.
A house divided cannot stand. Under our system, any attempts to fracture racial unity, such as Marxist class division, are rightfully considered subversion of the nation.
President Trump has betrayed what he considered his own movement, but which has always been “Much More Than Trump.” MAGA is fractured; minus Trump the underlying movement will be stronger than it is now. There are millions of Americans who fear the government and despise the so-called elites who control it. Their number only grows.
There is a strong possibility that Trump doesn’t finish out his term, and he may be gone by the end of next year. If he is removed from office, it will amplify the disgust and hatred many of his supporters and former supporters feel towards the government and the ruling caste. Those who have always hated Trump will have their revenge, but their victory will be Pyrrhic.
Why neocons are pushing Flock cameras and ubiquitous state surveillance generally; how it relates to neocon foreign policy; the dangerous condition where elites no longer fear the people over whom they rule; attempts to breed a… https://t.co/OHwEUYBxaz
Regardless if you are Republican or Democrat– all Americans should take a moment & listen to Tucker's opening monologue. Because if we don't wake up, we soon won't have a place to call home.
BONUS: Catherine Austin Fitts talks where America is heading, which doesn't look good. https://t.co/HxsMWD2NHR
I think there is more to this story than what we are being “fed”. I cannot imagine the fallout if that jet had been targeted but Trump left secretly. I wonder what the members of his cabinet feel at being hung out to dry. Since there was no attack, it appears to be another Israeli diversion but we will probably never know.
🇺🇸Reporter: "Trump is saying Iran tried to assassinate him in Turkey."
🇮🇷Araghchi: "No. There is absolutely no need for it."
🇺🇸Reporter: "Why?"
🇮🇷Araghchi: "Trump is already destroying the United States. We don't want to eliminate him."
When the Secretary of the Army orders every officer and sergeant in the force to personally check on every soldier, every single day, that is not a routine holiday gesture. It is an alarm. And in the ten months since Dan Driscoll issued that order, the alarm has kept ringing — from a carrier in the Arabian Sea, from a secretive command at Fort Meade, from the families of sailors who can no longer get a straight answer about why their children are hungry. The stories arrive from different branches and different missions, but they add up to a single indictment: the American military is being run past the limits of the people inside it, and too many of its leaders have responded not by fixing the problem but by denying it exists.
Neither I nor David have written what I’m posting in this exercise. It is from an independent source that I will reveal in due time along with a concluding post.
It is a CRITICAL THINKING exercise that I see from the comments some readers failing miserably. Rather than jump in with a knee-jerk reaction based on your preconceived notions, why not try tabula rasa? Tabula rasa is Latin for blank slate. Put all one’s prejudices and preconceived notions on the shelf and instead of reading into the text what you believe it says, let the text speak for itself. Then let it linger in your mind as you consider it before responding.
I must say some of the push-back has been quite good, but others have just been examples of propagandized minds. We can do better.
America's fuel reserves are critically low, with record exports draining our supply while China strategically stockpiles. Is this sound policy? We're shipping away our energy security. #EnergySecurity#USPolicy#ExportGatepic.twitter.com/7bgUM7fDyU
The Strategic Petroleum Reserve cannot go below 250,000 barrels to maintain structural integrity. We are almost empty today. Get ready for gas and food pricing shocks.
I don’t understand the point at this stage? Everybody knows… the entire leadership of this and every other western nation…